「repository」の検索結果

Create a commit following repository guidelines with proper versioning and changelog updates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforce Biome formatting and lint discipline in this repository. Use when making any file edits, when asked to run format/lint, and immediately before any commit. Always execute `bun run lint` (from package.json), apply resulting fixes, and re-run until clean. Treat `bun run lint:links` as optional by default, and recommend it when files under `content/` are changed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a repository's type system and generate type-safe DAG execution pipelines with GraphSentry-style certificate verification. This skill should be used when building LLM-driven workflows that need deterministic type safety, when composing typed operations into validated execution graphs, or when adding contract-checked pipeline orchestration to any codebase. Supports Python (Pydantic) and TypeScript (Zod).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cancel an active plugin-managed Kimi job for the current repository. Use only when the user explicitly asks to cancel a Kimi run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask Kimi a read-only free-form question about the current repository. Use for prose explanations, flow tracing, module comparisons, or conceptual reasoning where Codex should delegate the answer to local kimi-code rather than perform implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show the latest or selected plugin-managed Kimi job for the current repository. Use when the user explicitly asks for Kimi job status or progress.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits Claude Code repositories. Two-phase workflow — Phase 1 sweeps 14 hygiene categories (permissions, hooks, CLAUDE.md bloat, Skills hygiene, process-abstraction, plus structural) and an optional 7-layer leak check. Phase 2 executes [APPROVED] markers from the report file. Use for repo cleanup, pre-distribution sanity, post-feature hygiene, environment audit, process-abstraction discovery. Trigger on "audit my CC repo," "sweep my repository for hygiene," "check this CC environment," "find process abstraction candidates," "review my CLAUDE.md," "clean up my .claude directory," "pre-distribution hygiene check," "find layer leaks in my CC setup." Routes structural findings to rootnode-cc-design REMEDIATE. Composes with rootnode-critic-gate. CC-only — does not scan Claude Projects. Do NOT use for building a Skill (use rootnode-skill-builder), compiling a prompt (use rootnode-prompt-compilation), scoring a single prompt (use rootnode-prompt-validation), or auditing a Project (use rootnode-project-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks the status of the repository

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or improve documentation based on the current conversation. Use this when a plan has been created and changes were requested because it didn’t follow the repository’s conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract the conceptual essence of a repository as skills, agents, and teams — the project's roles, procedures, and coordination patterns expressed as agentskills.io-standard definitions. Reads an arbitrary codebase and produces generalized definitions that capture WHAT the project does and WHO operates it, without replicating HOW it does it. Use when onboarding to a new codebase and wanting to understand its conceptual architecture, when bootstrapping an agentic system from an existing project, when studying a project's organizational DNA for cross-pollination, or when creating a skill/agent/team library inspired by a reference implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply GitHub repository security protections tier by tier — rulesets, read-only Actions token, secret scanning + push protection, Dependabot, and (gated) required status checks / required PR with a GitHub App bypass for a CI auto-commit bot. Mutating and confirmation-gated: always assess first, apply the no-regret baseline, then decide required checks separately. Use when hardening a public user-owned repo after an audit, when a repo has no branch protection, when adding required checks without breaking a bot that pushes to the default branch, or when provisioning a GitHub App bypass actor for trusted automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement pharmaceutical serialisation and track-and-trace systems compliant with EU FMD, US DSCSA, and other global regulations. Covers unique identifier generation, aggregation hierarchy, EPCIS data exchange, and verification endpoint integration. Use when implementing serialisation for a new product launch, integrating with the EMVS/NMVS, designing DSCSA-compliant transaction exchange, building an EPCIS event repository, or extending serialisation to additional markets (China, Brazil, Russia).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate safely with a peer interactive session sharing the same git worktree — check first whether a separate worktree removes the problem, then declare path and branch scope before the first edit, survive a contended index lock, and review the whole branch before opening a PR. Activate when starting work in a repository that may already be occupied, when a git command fails with `index.lock: File exists`, when `guard:snapshot` refuses because a snapshot already exists, or when a commit turns out to contain a file this session never edited. When one session leads and the other supports, divide the labour by shape and re-derive every reported number against a named revision before citing it. Distinct from subagent concurrency: a peer session cannot be bracketed, because no baseline exists from before its edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and repair Claude Code discovery symlinks for skills, agents, and teams. Compares registries against .claude/ directories at project and global levels, detects missing, broken, and extraneous symlinks, distinguishes almanac content from external projects, and optionally repairs gaps. Use after adding new skills or agents, after a repository rename or move, when slash commands stop working, or as a periodic health check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spring Boot coding conventions: REST controller design, service layer, dependency injection, configuration, DTO patterns, exception handling, and Bean Validation. Apply on any Spring Boot project. Works alongside spring-boot-plugin:spring-data-jpa for persistence and java-foundation:java-conventions for domain objects. Use this skill to: - Structure REST endpoints with @RestController, proper HTTP semantics, and DTO mapping. - Enforce constructor injection and @ConfigurationProperties over @Value on fields. - Write @Service classes with transactional boundaries at the right layer. - Handle errors consistently with @RestControllerAdvice and ProblemDetail (RFC 9457). Do NOT use this skill for: - JPA entity and repository patterns — see spring-boot-plugin:spring-data-jpa. - Spring Security configuration — see the security phase injection in stack.md. - Build tool configuration — see java-foundation:build-tooling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for onboarding, orientation, a repository tour, or where to start. Produces an evidence-backed seven-section map, deep-reads real files, and asks for the next move.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an existing repository needs its unexplained rationale recovered into topic files. Don't use for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a repository decision needs an interview plus durable terminology and decision records. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a scheduled or watcher tick requests a repository-health pass. Not for source, label, merge, or close mutation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants one-time repository setup for tracker, triage labels, and domain conventions. Not for ongoing triage, issue creation, or multi-repo setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creative work is requested with no approved design, or a raw idea or repository must be developed into an approved design document. Not for work with an approved design in context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a human explicitly asks for a full repository agent-compatibility pass returning a scored report with prioritized fixes. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an exact symbol, path, entrypoint, or line range can bound a focused code question or patch proposal under a fixed source budget. Not for source changes or broad repository exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when onboarding to a repository, capturing costly conventions, constraints, or rationale, or improving AGENTS.md. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。