「rev」の検索結果

Use when creating an approachable, self-contained HTML review aid for a pull request; explaining what changed, why it matters, how it works, and how it fits into the broader system; turning PR diffs, commits, tests, and architecture context into a local `.pr-review/` HTML page for reviewers; or helping reviewers understand complex code changes without dumping the full diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Playwright tests for quality. Use when user says "review tests", "check test quality", "audit tests", "improve tests", "test code review", or "playwright best practices check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review through the lens of real engineers' documented philosophies (Torvalds, Thompson, Carmack, Kent Beck, Jobs, Cagan). Complements abstract-role adversarial review with named, sourced perspectives. Use when automated review findings feel generic, when a PR has architectural or UX impact, or when the author wants pre-submit hardening beyond standard checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a startup is approached by a prospective partner and someone has to decide should we sign this partner, at what partner tier (referral / reseller / OEM / SI-consulting / strategic alliance), with what joint GTM commitment, and at what revshare. Classifies partner tier from independent-demand evidence vs. preferential-terms hunting, designs a 90-day joint GTM plan, models revshare against direct-sale margin, and surfaces kill criteria for unwinding under-performing partnerships. For Head of Partnerships, Head of BD, and Founder-CEOs doing reseller agreement, OEM deal, or strategic alliance review — not technical sale enablement, not channel cost economics, not M&A.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, scoring, or auditing third-party SaaS / vendor relationships — running a vendor scorecard with industry tuning, tracking SLA compliance with credit-claim flags, classifying third-party risk across 4 risk vectors, preparing a tier-1 vendor review, or auditing the SaaS portfolio. Forks context so large vendor catalogs (50-500 line items) and SLA logs don't pollute the parent thread. Triggers on "vendor SLA", "vendor scorecard", "third-party risk", "TPRM", "vendor review", "supplier performance", "vendor health check", "renewal review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review agent-written changes before merge, after substantial edits, or when re-reviewing a repair. Use the adversarial protocol for high-risk changes or an explicitly requested deep review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the pre-built code-review-graph knowledge graph (Tree-sitter, whole monorepo) instead of walking call chains with Grep+Read – 2-6x cheaper, and it catches dynamic dispatch that grep misses. Use for ANY task that spans multiple files, even when the user never mentions a graph or asks for it - fixing or tracing a bug ("fix this bug", "why does X happen", "trace this"), exploring unfamiliar code ("how does X work", "who calls X", "what imports Y", "where is X used or handled"), planning or doing a refactor ("rename X", "is it safe to change or remove X", "what would break", "blast radius", "find dead code"), or reviewing changes ("review this PR", "review this branch or diff"). When you are about to Grep for a symbol's callers, callees, or importers, use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route code, repository, and data/SQL work to isolated Kortix sessions instead of burning your main context on it. Use when asked to implement a feature, fix a bug, make failing tests pass, work a ticket/issue, refactor, navigate or change a codebase, ship a PR, review a pull request, or run SQL/warehouse analysis against a dataset — and when the user wants two agents or parallel reviewers/investigators on the same work. Covers the explore-vs-session routing call, deciding where the code lives (this project's repo vs cloning an external GitHub repo) or where the data lives, finding the repo with gh, spawning sessions in parallel, dual PR reviews, and reporting results back. Triggers: 'implement', 'fix the bug', 'make the tests pass', 'work this ticket', 'refactor this', 'open a PR', 'review this PR', 'run two agents on it', 'query the warehouse', 'analyze this dataset'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get an external patent examiner review of a patent application. Use when user says "专利审查", "patent review", "审查意见", "examiner review", or wants critical feedback on patent claims and specification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow 4: Submission rebuttal pipeline. Parses external reviews, enforces coverage and grounding, drafts a safe text-only rebuttal under venue limits, and manages follow-up rounds. Use when user says "rebuttal", "reply to reviewers", "ICML rebuttal", "OpenReview response", or wants to answer external reviews safely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-chat MCP server or environment variables. Trigger with "auto review loop llm" or "llm review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous multi-round research review loop. In Copilot CLI it defaults to the native complementary rubber-duck subagent with host-event model evidence; elsewhere it uses Codex, while explicit external reviewer overrides remain available. Implements fixes and re-reviews until a policy-approved positive assessment or max rounds is reached.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a read-only, defect-first review of a specified code change and return every actionable finding. Use when another agent delegates review of uncommitted changes, a base-branch diff, a commit, or custom review instructions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs ARA Seal Level 2 semantic epistemic review on Agent-Native Research Artifacts, scoring six dimensions (evidence relevance, falsifiability, scope calibration, argument coherence, exploration integrity, methodological rigor) and producing a constructive, severity-ranked report with a Strong Accept-to-Reject recommendation. Use after Level 1 structural validation passes, when an ARA needs an objective epistemic critique before publication or release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

First-pass privilege log review — make the obvious privilege calls and flag the hard ones for attorney review without making close calls. Use when the user says "review the privilege log", "priv log", "check privilege on these docs", or has a log to QA before production.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Professor's review queue — student output waits here for professor approval before going to clients or courts. Only active if "formal review queue" supervision style was chosen at setup; otherwise dormant. Use when the professor wants to see what's waiting for review, approve, edit-then-approve, or return an item.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Apache DataFusion pull requests following the project's PR review guide. Use whenever asked to review a DataFusion PR or PR URL, and whenever creating a PR, to check the changes against the same criteria before submitting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompile Android APK, XAPK, JAR, and AAR files using jadx or Fernflower/Vineflower. Reverse engineer Android apps, extract HTTP API endpoints (Retrofit, OkHttp, Volley), and trace call flows from UI to network layer. Use when the user wants to decompile, analyze, or reverse engineer Android packages, find API endpoints, or follow call flows. 中文触发词：反编译APK、安卓逆向、提取API、分析安卓应用、反编译安卓、逆向工程、追踪调用链、提取接口

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares codebases for security review using Trail of Bits' checklist. Helps set review goals, runs static analysis tools, increases test coverage, removes dead code, ensures accessibility, and generates documentation (flowcharts, user stories, inline comments). Use when preparing your own codebase to be audited by someone else, getting a repository review-ready before an external security review, deciding what to fix before auditors start, or asking what assessors need from a project. For understanding unfamiliar code you are about to audit, use audit-context-building instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triages a repository's open GitHub issues and pull requests via the gh CLI. Optionally reviews and merges ready PRs — incrementally merging passing automated/bot PRs and maintainer-approved ones, and spawning review subagents for never-reviewed ones — then closes already-resolved issues with comments citing the resolving PR or commit, cross-links issues with their pending fix PRs, and assigns local-only priority and change-size estimates for everything outstanding. Use when triaging, grooming, or reviewing a repository's open issues and PRs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs security-focused differential review of code changes. Adapts analysis depth to codebase size, uses git blame for context, calculates blast radius by counting callers, checks test coverage of modified code, and generates a markdown report. Use when reviewing a PR, commit, or diff for security vulnerabilities, checking whether a change re-introduces a previously fixed bug, asking what else a change could break, or finding which modified code has no test covering it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews code changes using CodeRabbit AI. Use when user asks for code review, PR feedback, code quality checks, security issues, or requests fix-review cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to turn content into revenue, build a content-led GTM motion, reverse engineer distribution, or repurpose content across platforms. Also use when the user mentions 'content marketing,' 'content-led growth,' 'content to pipeline,' 'distribution,' 'content repurposing,' 'content strategy,' 'thought leadership,' 'newsletter,' 'content flywheel,' 'organic growth.' This skill covers content-to-revenue systems from creation through pipeline attribution. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze PR review comments from a GitHub PR URL. Fetch review comments, verify each finding against the actual codebase, assess validity (correct/incorrect/partial), present a structured summary with recommended actions, and optionally reply to each comment on GitHub. Use when given a PR review URL or when asked to check/analyze PR feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。