1.2万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
UI component review patterns. Use when reviewing React components, hooks, props, state, styling, and accessibility. Covers rules of hooks, effect cleanup, render performance, list keys, keyboard and ARIA patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code review patterns, feedback principles. Use when reviewing PRs, implementations, or making approval/rejection decisions. Covers self-correction, progress tracking, feedback principles, severity levels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI integration review patterns. Use when reviewing model API calls, prompt construction, LLM output handling, RAG pipelines, and tool-calling code. Covers prompt-injection call-chain tracing, output validation, token budgets, retry/timeout handling, streaming, and key/PII exposure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Backend code review patterns. Use when reviewing API routes, database operations, auth middleware, and server utilities. Covers injection, boundary validation, authorization coverage, secret/PII exposure, error leakage, and query patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classify a proposed code change as Leaf Node or Core Code to decide how much AI usage and review rigor is appropriate. Use this skill whenever the user asks "is this leaf or core", "what kind of change is this", "should I vibe code this", "can AI write this", "how rigorous should the review be", or before starting any non-trivial change. Also useful as a sub-step inside other workflows (planning, PR prep, code review) when classification matters. Asks 6 diagnostic questions about propagation range, change frequency, tech-debt tolerance, examples, failure cost, and review intensity, then outputs a clear classification with the recommended approach. Trigger even when the user describes a change without explicitly asking for classification — the answer changes how they should proceed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform structured code reviews focusing on correctness, readability, security, and maintainability. Use this skill when reviewing pull requests, evaluating code changes, or establishing review standards for a team.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews audio DSP code for numerical correctness. Use when the user asks to review, audit, or check DSP code for correctness issues — filters, feedback loops, fixed-point arithmetic, accumulation loops, or any numeric computation in audio code. Trigger on "check this filter for NaN", "why does my reverb blow up?", "is this numerically stable?", "why do I hear DC in my output?". Pairs with audio-dsp-review (realtime safety); this skill covers numeric correctness. Flag issues proactively.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews JUCE audio plugin code for JUCE-specific correctness issues: thread safety, APVTS parameter patterns, MessageManager usage, ValueTree, and MIDI handling. Use when the user asks to review a JUCE plugin, check a processBlock, audit parameter handling, or asks "is this JUCE code safe?". Trigger on phrases like "review my JUCE plugin", "check my AudioProcessor", "is this APVTS usage correct?", or when you see AudioProcessor, AudioProcessorEditor, or AudioProcessorValueTreeState in the code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews AudioUnit v2/v3 plugin implementations for spec compliance, thread safety, and correctness. Use when the user asks to review an AudioUnit plugin, check an AUv3 app extension, audit property or parameter handling, or asks "is my AUComponent thread-safe?" or "why does my AU crash in Logic?". Trigger on phrases like "review my AudioUnit", "check my AUv3", "is my render block safe?", or when you see AURenderCallback, internalRenderBlock, kAudioUnitProperty_*, or AUAudioUnit in the code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews VST3 plugin implementations for spec compliance, host compatibility, and correctness. Use when the user asks to review a VST3 plugin, check bus arrangements, audit parameter handling, or verify their process() callback is safe. Trigger on phrases like "review my VST3 plugin", "check VST3 bus arrangement", "is my VST3 process safe", "audit my IAudioProcessor", or when you see IComponent, IAudioProcessor, IEditController, ProcessData, or Vst:: namespaced types in the code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews CLAP plugin implementations for spec compliance, thread safety, and correctness. Use when the user asks to review a CLAP plugin, audit a CLAP extension, or check whether their process() callback follows the CLAP threading model. Trigger on phrases like "review my CLAP plugin", "check CLAP extension", "is my CLAP process() safe", "audit my clap_plugin_t", or when you see clap_plugin_t, clap_process_t, or CLAP extension structs in the code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews Web Audio API JavaScript/TypeScript code for correctness, thread safety, and deprecated patterns. Use when the user asks to review AudioWorklet code, check an AudioWorkletProcessor, audit Web Audio graph construction, or diagnose crackling/dropouts in a web audio app. Trigger on phrases like "review my Web Audio code", "check my AudioWorklet", "is my AudioWorkletProcessor safe", or "why does my web audio crackle".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify code-review or security-review findings for false positives using deep codebase tracing, framework-aware analysis, and web research. Produces a .verified.md report alongside the original. Use when a review report has been generated and needs independent verification, or when user runs /verify-findings, mentions "verify review", "check false positives", or "validate findings".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Zero-dependency live-preview server providing an agent↔browser bidirectional companion. Watches a content directory, wraps HTML fragments in a frame template, broadcasts live-reload over WebSocket, and captures browser-side click events to a JSONL file. Use when an agent needs to show HTML to the user in a browser and react to clicks — mockups, design exploration, gallery browsing, multi-select choices, prototype iteration. Triggered by "live preview", "browser companion", "preview server", "browser mockup", "show in browser", "arkhe-preview", or any skill that wants to write HTML fragments and have the user see them reload in real time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews open Dependabot PRs, classifies by risk (patch/minor/major, security, lockfile-only), and merges safe ones or advises on what to do. Use when user mentions "dependabot", "dependabot PRs", "dependency updates", "merge dependabot", "review dependabot", "dependency PRs", "bump PRs", "update dependencies", or runs /dependabot-review command.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI coding assistant and line-by-line review isn't feasible. Also use when the user asks about complecting, simplicity vs. easiness, structural coupling, or concept deduplication. Trigger on phrases like "is this simple", "does this complect", "review for complexity", "structural analysis", or any reference to Hickey, Simple Made Easy, or grey-box review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review then build — chains architecture review into implementation. Accepts any spec format (ticket, PRD, engineering spec, feature description, screenshot) and autonomously reviews the design, resolves gaps, then implements with tests and a PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit academic peer review operations -- reviewer matching algorithms, conflict of interest detection, turnaround time optimization, review quality scoring, and editorial workflow management..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a structured Quarterly Business Review deck for a customer account. Use when user says "QBR", "quarterly business review", "prep my QBR", "build the deck", "renewal prep", "executive check-in", "90-day review", or "customer business review" - even if they don't use the acronym. Applies to CSMs preparing for executive-level customer meetings focused on value delivered, health, and next quarter alignment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and interpret financial statements to surface performance signals, quality concerns, and red flags. Use when an accountant says "review these financials", "analyze the income statement", "look at the balance sheet", "what does the cash flow statement tell us", "check the financial health", "ratio analysis", "are the earnings real", "working capital review", "does this company have liquidity issues", or needs to interpret any of the three core financial statements - even if they don't explicitly say "financial statement review". Also trigger when someone shares P&L, balance sheet, or cash flow data and asks what it means.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a Yuzu pull request end to end with a static-first trust gate, isolated dynamic testing, adversarial Kimi/Codex review, a posted verdict, and head-SHA-bound re-review. Use when the user types forms such as "go PR123", "go 123", or "/go PR123"; use `--promote SHA` only after a collaborator accepts the static review of an external fork.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects review-blocking configuration issues including sub-1.0 version numbers, beta in app name, staging endpoints, and missing demo credentials that prevent reviewers from evaluating the app, violating Guidelines 2.1 and 2.3.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects improper use of SKStoreReviewController.requestReview() that violates Guideline 5.6.1 — including prompts triggered by button taps, excessive frequency, or satisfaction gating.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan or review software architecture through a small expert panel. Use when the user explicitly asks for architecture planning, system design, technical strategy, an architecture assessment, a design review, or a system health review. Do not use for ordinary PR review, debugging, or implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。