1,351 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Delegate implementation (or, when explicitly requested, research) to GPT-6.1 Sol (high reasoning; xhigh on request) via Codex CLI. Claude plans, orchestrates, and reviews; Sol writes the code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews code for quality and security issues. Combines code quality review with security vulnerability detection. Use when reviewing code after generation in Construction Phase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews construction plans for architecture consistency and implementation feasibility. Use when reviewing implementation plans before approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews pull requests for overall quality before merging. Combines code quality and security checks at PR level. Use when performing pre-merge review in Operations Phase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews deployment plans for completeness, rollback procedures, and monitoring setup. Use when reviewing deployment plans before approval in Operations Phase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews integration completeness including design-implementation consistency, review/test coverage, and completion criteria. Use when performing integration review in Construction Phase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when running or interpreting VCSDD adversarial reviews. Provides calibration guidance for the Adversary agent, finding severity classification, and anti-leniency enforcement patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the strict-mode sprint contract review after Phase 2c. Spawns a fresh vcsdd-adversary instance to review `contracts/sprint-N.md` and writes a PASS/FAIL verdict under `reviews/contracts/sprint-N/output/`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
REQUIRED skill for any security-related request. Use this skill whenever the user wants to find anything dangerous, sensitive, or risky in their code, files, or repository. This includes but is not limited to: scanning for secrets/keys/tokens/credentials, checking dependencies for vulnerabilities, auditing destructive commands for missing safeguards, reviewing files for PII or internal data before open-sourcing, checking .env files or git history for leaked credentials, or any request where the concern is "is this safe/secure/exposed?" This skill provides a structured audit methodology and checklist you MUST follow — do not attempt security reviews without it. Skip this skill ONLY for pure feature work, refactoring, bug fixes, or non-security code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform critical Rust code reviews covering correctness, edition 2024 compliance, error handling, API design, async pitfalls, and dependency hygiene. ALWAYS use this skill when the user wants to review, audit, or critically evaluate Rust code — whether that's a PR diff, a specific crate or module, a cross-cutting concern like error handling, or the whole codebase. This includes requests to "review my changes", "check this code", "audit for best practices", "look for issues", "what's wrong with this", or "flag anything that could bite us". Use it even when the user doesn't say "review" explicitly but is asking you to find problems, inconsistencies, or anti-patterns in existing Rust code. Do NOT use for requests to write, fix, refactor, test, explain, or implement code — only for evaluating existing code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterative literature-review workflow for a research topic. Use this skill to draft up to 10 search keywords, build a seed set from OpenAlex title-and-abstract matches, expand by backward and forward citations, screen candidates by title and abstract, repeat until no new relevant papers remain, rank the final set, inspect up to 30 full texts, build a concept-reference knowledge graph, and write a literature review grounded only in the final included references.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses agent capabilities by analyzing agent files and determining what tasks they can handle. Use when you need to evaluate if an existing agent can handle a task or if a new agent is needed. Reviews agent descriptions, skills, and workflows to determine capability match.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured cross-review protocol between specialized agents. Ensures scope alignment, priority calibration, and domain-aware feedback. Use when one agent reviews another's work, during handoffs, or when validating cross-cutting concerns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Super Base Context — project doc loader & synchronizer. Triggers even without explicit "load docs"/"sync docs." READ MODE — load architecture/modules/coding/decision docs when work references project state: code work (write/modify/remove); design (features/APIs/schemas/architecture); review (modules, past solutions); tech selection; ADR research; migration/refactor planning; performance/security analysis; tests; code reviews; any spec/plan/design/ADR referencing project. WRITE MODE — NET DELTA vs. last doc sync: additions/modifications/REMOVALS/deprecations of previously-synced code or decisions (docs revert: delete BCU file/ADR), AND rollbacks. User signals: sync docs/done/ready to commit/pre-commit/record decision. Auto-fires before final task-completion reply. WRITE MODE does NOT fire on: brainstorming, generic/read-only Q&A, in-session try-and-undo with no net change, already-synced.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Implement VADER sentiment analysis for social media text scoring. Use this skill when the user needs to analyze sentiment in tweets, reviews, or social posts, compute compound sentiment scores, or classify text polarity — even if they say 'is this positive or negative', 'sentiment of these comments', or 'social media mood analysis'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Calculate Wilson Score confidence intervals for ranking items by positive proportion with sample size correction. Use this skill when the user needs to rank products by ratings, sort content by approval rate, or build a 'best rated' list that accounts for sample size — even if they say 'rank by star rating', 'best rated with few reviews', or 'confidence-adjusted rating'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Safely merge GitHub pull requests using comprehensive pre-merge validation. Use this skill when the user asks to merge a PR, complete a PR workflow, or check if a PR is ready to merge. Validates CI/CD status, reviews, and conflicts before merging with the appropriate strategy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage, fix, and pre-flight a PR before merge. Checks mergeability, CI, reviews, and bot comments — fixes issues, runs /pre-commit before pushing, then hands off to /pr-merge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dispatch reviews to external companion AIs (Codex, Gemini, Claude) for an independent second opinion on code changes, PR readiness, doc completeness, architecture, or implementation status. Use when you want a fresh-eyes review beyond Claude-native. Trigger on "get a second opinion", "companion review", "review my changes", "review the PR". For Claude-only quality checks use /code-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs critical code reviews using REVIEW.md guidelines. Evaluates code quality, architecture, testing, and domain-specific concerns (legal faithfulness, cross-law references, engine safety). Use after completing significant code changes or before merging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when independently reviewing a research-paper draft before submission, running a mock top-conference panel, assessing readiness or accept/reject risk, or predicting reviewer concerns for venues such as CVPR, ICCV, ECCV, ICLR, NeurIPS, and AAAI. Does not draft or audit author responses after official reviews arrive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when research writing, reviews, rebuttals, or related-work planning needs academic evidence. Searches literature, screens candidate papers, audits novelty and missing work, verifies DOI/BibTeX/reference metadata and citation authenticity, and checks whether sources support the stated claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, build, scaffold, or safely extend Atlassian Forge apps using current official documentation. Use for fresh Forge apps, existing-app feature work, module and manifest changes, UI Kit or Custom UI implementation, backend functions and events, Atlassian or external APIs, storage, permissions, environment configuration, distribution-affecting implementation, validation, and explicitly authorized deployment or installation; route standalone debugging and specialist reviews to their dedicated skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。