5,061 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
After architecture is complete, produces a flat actionable rules sheet for programmers — what you must do, what you must never do, per system and per layer. Extracted from all Accepted ADRs, technical preferences, and engine reference docs. More immediately actionable than ADRs (which explain why).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read this skill before the first step that uses the built-in browser, the browser pane inside the Claude desktop app (also called the in-app browser, the browser pane, Claude's browser, or "your own browser"), whose tools are named mcp__Claude_Browser__* when the session runs in the desktop app and mcp__remote-devices__Claude_Browser__* when a cloud session is linked to the person's computer; before those tools are turned on there may be a single enable__mcp__remote-devices__Claude_Browser tool instead. It covers the pane's persistent sign-ins, tabs and preview_start, reading pages as text, site approvals, what the pane cannot open, and what to do when it cannot be reached. It is not for Claude in Chrome (mcp__claude-in-chrome__* tools), which has its own skill, and it does not decide which browser to use.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user wants intellectual understanding — learning how or why something works, not getting a task done or soliciting Claude's judgment. Trigger for: - Explicit learning requests: teach, explain, ELI5, walk me through, quiz me, flashcards, "I'm rusty on"; definitions ("what is X") - Terse concept names implying "help me understand this": "Galois theory," "transformers, from scratch" - Confusion signals: "won't stick," "keep mixing these up," "not getting it" - Learning-path questions: prerequisites, sequencing, what to study before X - Conceptual questions about mechanisms, causes, or dynamics Don't trigger for: - Tasks: coding, writing, calculation, translation, factual lookup, news updates - Personal troubleshooting; resource/textbook recommendations - Claude's evaluative verdict: opinion prompts ("do you think X", "settle this", "honest take", "is X dead / still taken seriously") and interpretive takes ("was X really as harsh as people say")
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Retrieve relevant memories for the current task from AgentDB. Use at the start of a task to load prior knowledge, when stuck to surface what worked before, or when the user asks "what do we know about X" / "have we done this before?"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converting a supplied prompt into an executable specification: detects vague quality/quantity/explanation/style/design/technical/judgment wording, role and persona theater, and self-contradiction, then replaces each with a numeric bound, an observable behavior, or a scorable criterion — with a per-term ledger of what changed and what stayed open. Don't use for AI system design, RAG, or eval harnesses (Oracle), PRD/SRS authoring (Scribe), spec conformance verification (Attest), or SKILL.md normalization (Gauge).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reinforces an AI agent by turning Monte Carlo's reinforcement loop diagnosis into code fixes. Reads the daily reinforcement loop report for an agent's workflows, ranks the diagnosed issues, proposes what to fix, and — with the user's approval at each step — opens a pull request. Activates on "fix my agent", "improve my agent's health", "reinforce my agent", "what should I fix in my agent". Not for investigating a specific agent alert or trace (monte-carlo-troubleshoot-agent-traces), creating agent monitors (monte-carlo-monitoring-advisor), or instrumenting a new agent (monte-carlo-instrument-agent).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a change before it is merged, from little or no input. With nothing typed it reviews the branch you are on, uncommitted work included, against its base, its PR and its ticket, so a developer can check their own work before asking for review. With PR links, repo#N or a branch it reviews someone else's change the same way, several repos at once. It judges the failed CI checks and every Bugbot and reviewer comment, gets a fresh breaker review, traces every other piece of code that uses what changed, proves each finding or marks it unproven, says what the merge needs (a build, env vars, migrations, deploy order) and how to check the deploy, never posts to GitHub, and offers fixes only after the report. Runs only when the user types it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
After scaffolded practice, run an unassisted check — a problem with no AI help. Separates what the learner can do with support from what they can do independently. Critical for preventing phantom attainment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define the scope and purpose of a complex inquiry before mapping or futures work begins. Use when a class or group needs to agree what they are investigating, who it matters to, and at what scale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Whole-repo audit for over-engineering. Like ponytail-review, but scans the entire codebase instead of a diff: a ranked list of what to delete, simplify, or replace with stdlib/native equivalents. Use when the user says "audit this codebase", "audit for over-engineering", "what can I delete from this repo", "find bloat", "ponytail-audit", or "/ponytail-audit". One-shot report, does not apply fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Harvest every `ponytail:` comment in the codebase into a debt ledger, so the deliberate shortcuts and deferrals ponytail leaves behind get tracked instead of rotting into "later means never". Use when the user says "ponytail debt", "/ponytail-debt", "what did ponytail defer", "list the shortcuts", "ponytail ledger", or "what did we mark to do later". One-shot report, changes nothing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan, map, or restructure their website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, or internal linking. Also use when the user mentions "sitemap," "site map," "visual sitemap," "site structure," "page hierarchy," "information architecture," "IA," "navigation design," "URL structure," "breadcrumbs," "internal linking strategy," "website planning," "what pages do I need," "how should I organize my site," or "site navigation." Use this whenever someone is planning what pages a website should have and how they connect. NOT for XML sitemaps (that's technical SEO — see seo-audit). For SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user needs marketing ideas, inspiration, or strategies for their SaaS or software product. Also use when the user asks for 'marketing ideas,' 'growth ideas,' 'how to market,' 'marketing strategies,' 'marketing tactics,' 'ways to promote,' 'ideas to grow,' 'what else can I try,' 'I don't know how to market this,' 'brainstorm marketing,' or 'what marketing should I do.' Use this as a starting point whenever someone is stuck or looking for inspiration on how to grow. For specific channel execution, see the relevant skill (ads, social, emails, etc.).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extracts what the user actually wants instead of what they think they should want. Achieves this through one-question-at-a-time interview until ~95% confidence about the underlying intent. Use when an ask is underspecified ("build me X" without "for whom" or "why now"), when the user explicitly invokes ("interview me", "grill me", "are we sure?", "stress-test my thinking"), or when you catch yourself silently filling in ambiguous requirements before any plan, spec, or code exists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to create, plan, or optimize a lead magnet for email capture or lead generation. Also use when the user mentions "lead magnet," "gated content," "content upgrade," "downloadable," "ebook," "cheat sheet," "checklist," "template download," "opt-in," "freebie," "PDF download," "resource library," "content offer," "email capture content," "Notion template," "spreadsheet template," or "what should I give away for emails." Use this for planning what to create and how to distribute it. For interactive tools as lead magnets, see free-tools. For writing the actual content, see copywriting. For the email sequence after capture, see emails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community research," "forum research," "competitor reviews," "customer sentiment," or "find out why customers churn/convert/buy." Use for both analyzing existing research assets AND gathering new research from online sources. For writing copy informed by research, see copywriting. For acting on research to improve pages, see cro.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answers BMad questions and recommends the next skill from what is installed. Use when the user asks bmad for help, what to do next or where to start; to set up, update, repair, doctor, migrate or check the status of the installation, or add modules; or to see or change the active initiative.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes current state and user query to answer BMad questions or recommend the next skill(s) to use. Use when user asks for help, bmad help, what to do next, or what to start with in BMad.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Developer reference for building applications, tools, and agents on the Pi Durable agent harness (@earendil-works/pi-durable) and the pi-ai model layer. Use when writing or debugging code that imports @earendil-works/pi-durable or pi-ai: assembling a Harness over memory/SQLite/JSONL/Durable Object storage, submitting input and waiting for answers, defining tools with TypeBox schemas and structured output, calling tools from tools, hooks and guards, durable tasks with checkpoints and ownership, subagents and child tasks, documents and migrations, code mode, tool search, per-conversation environments, compaction, recovery after a crash, storage and environment conformance tests, or choosing models and providers. Also use when a durable/agent-runtime behavior question comes up: what survives a restart, why an input stayed queued, why a task is blocked or orphaned, how abort cascades, or what the Pico5 specification requires.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Win #1 Product of the Day on Product Hunt. Completely reverse-engineered from 30x daily winner and 3x weekly winner campaigns — ranking algorithm decoded, launch timing optimized, hunter selection guide, community engagement approach, and post-launch momentum playbook. Use this if you're: (1) already read PH launch guides but still can't break into Top 5 and need algorithm-level deep optimization, (2) targeting Daily #1 and 5,000+ sign-ups with a proven 30+ case validated approach, or (3) an investor/accelerator coaching portfolio companies on PH launches. What's inside: PH ranking algorithm decoded: weighted factors for first 3 hours, 24 hours, and weekly ranking · Pre-launch preparation: gallery optimization, product URL selection, tagline refinement (≤60 chars) · Launch timing optimization: exact PST launch windows + scheduling guide · Community engagement KPIs: upvote targets, comment response time, maker comment strategy · Platform compliance guide: understanding PH's quality signals and organic growth · Post-launch 72-hour plan: maintaining momentum, conditions for Weekly #1 · Case studies: 3 different categories (AI Tool, App, SaaS) dissected Expected outcomes: Product Hunt Daily #1 ranking · strong community engagement on launch day · 3,000–10,000+ sign-ups (depending on product-market fit) 🇨🇳 Product Hunt 打榜完整攻略 | 🇯🇵 Product Hunt ローンチガイド | 🇰🇷 Product Hunt 런칭 가이드 Keywords: Product Hunt #1, Product Hunt launch strategy, PH ranking algorithm, PH #1 daily winner, Product Hunt tips, product launch, startup launch, ranking optimization, PH gallery optimization, Community engagement strategy, maker community engagement, product strategy, launch tactics, how to win Product Hunt, product hunt best practices
Your team has high autonomy — and standups are vague, weekly meetings drift into status reports, and 1:1s produce nothing but "I'm fine." This playbook fixes all three layers at once. What's inside: • Daily Standup system — 3-field format, good sample, 4 COO principles to keep it honest • Weekly Meeting — strict 25-min agenda, Scrum Master rotation, 0–10 pulse check • 1:1 Framework — 9-dimension quantified pulse, 5-group deep question bank, bilateral feedback structure • Diagnostic layer — "stuck-at" detection: info / authority / collaboration / capability / direction • FAQ for 4 common failure modes (dead standups, status-report meetings, "I'm fine" 1:1s, scaling beyond 10 people) 🇨🇳 你的团队自由度很高——但 standup 越来越糊，例会变成汇报，1:1 问不出真话。这套三层 Motivation 操作手册解决的正是这件事：standup 是信息层，例会是对齐层，1:1 是个人层。三件事做好了，motivation 不是管出来的，是长出来的。 🇯🇵 チームの自律性は高いのに、スタンドアップは曖昧で、週次ミーティングは進捗報告になり、1on1では「大丈夫です」しか返ってこない——このプレイブックは、その3層すべてを同時に解決します。 🇰🇷 팀의 자율성은 높은데 스탠드업은 두루뭉술하고, 주간 회의는 진척 보고가 되어버리고, 1:1에서는 진심을 들을 수 없다면 — 이 플레이북이 세 레이어 모두를 동시에 해결합니다. Triggers: "团队 motivation" | "standup 没人写" | "例会变成汇报" | "1:1 问不出真话" | "高自由度团队管理" | "COO 如何管人" | "team motivation" | "standup best practices" | "1on1 framework" | "weekly meeting template" | "チームモチベーション" | "팀 동기부여" | "AI startup team ops" | "remote team alignment" | "engagement下降"
It's 11pm before your launch. Your PH page is ready but you have no idea what actually moves the ranking algorithm. Upvotes? Comments? Time-of-day? This is the hour-by-hour operations manual from someone who's coached 30+ #1 finishes. What's inside: • Ranking algorithm deep-dive (it's not just upvotes — weighted factors decoded) • Launch day minute-by-minute checklist (PST timing, first 3 hours are critical) • Voter mobilization strategies (ethical, anti-spam-safe approaches) • Asset preparation templates (gallery, tagline ≤60 chars, maker comments) • Post-launch 72h momentum plan (convert PH traffic → retained users) Built from: 30+ PH #1 daily wins, 10+ weekly top 3, 2 monthly top 5. 3,000-5,000+ upvotes per launch. Triggers: "Product Hunt" | "PH launch" | "Product Hunt #1" | "PH ranking" | "Product Hunt strategy" | "PH upvotes" | "launch day" | "PH打榜" | "Product Hunt攻略" | "PH ranking algorithm"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You launched an ambassador program. 3 applications. One ghosted after week 2. Should you lower the bar? Offer more perks? Spam influencers? This gives you the complete community & ambassador operations SOP — from pre-launch checklist to recruitment to tiered management to retention to governance. Built from Notion (20M users, real ambassador interviews), AFFiNE (60K stars), Asana, and ClickUp programs. By @WeiYipei. What's inside: • Pre-launch readiness checklist (6 conditions that must be true before starting) • 6-step community setup SOP (platform selection → rules → admin standards → monitoring → wiki → metrics) • Ambassador recruitment system (A+B qualification, application form design, scoring rubric) • 4-tier progression system (Bronze → Silver → Gold → Platinum with point thresholds) • 5-pillar incentive framework (Product quality → Beta access → Founder access → KOL path → Full engagement) • Churn early-warning system + retention playbook • Event operations SOP (6 event types × full lifecycle) • Health metrics dashboard (6 core KPIs + 5 ambassador-specific indicators) • Governance & risk control (behavior code, escalation matrix) • Real templates: recruitment post, welcome email, annual calendar 🇨🇳 你搞了个大使计划。来了3个申请。一个第二周就消失了。该降门槛？加福利？群发KOL？这份SOP给你从启动前置条件到招募到留存到治理的完整社区/大使运营方法论。基于 Notion（2000万用户，大使真实访谈）、AFFiNE（60K stars）、Asana、ClickUp 实战案例。 🇯🇵 アンバサダープログラムを立ち上げた。応募3件。1人は2週間で消えた。基準を下げる？特典を増やす？このSOPは、事前チェックリストから採用、段階管理、リテンション、ガバナンスまでの完全なコミュニティ＆アンバサダー運営フレームワークを提供します。Notion（2000万ユーザー）、AFFiNE（60K stars）の実例から構築。 🇰🇷 앰배서더 프로그램을 시작했습니다. 지원 3건. 하나는 2주 만에 사라졌습니다. 기준을 낮출까요? 이 SOP는 사전 체크리스트부터 모집, 단계별 관리, 리텐션, 거버넌스까지 완전한 커뮤니티 & 앰배서더 운영 프레임워크를 제공합니다. Notion(2000만 사용자), AFFiNE(60K stars) 실전 사례에서 구축. Triggers: "ambassador program" | "community building" | "community management" | "DevRel" | "developer relations" | "community growth" | "大使计划" | "社区运营" | "社区搭建" | "コミュニティ運営" | "アンバサダー" | "커뮤니티 운영" | "앰배서더" | "open source community" | "user retention"
🇺🇸 Your dev team ships features nobody asked for while user-reported bugs pile up for months. Operations blames engineering for ignoring users; engineering blames operations for not understanding technical constraints. This gives you the complete Product × Engineering × Operations alignment SOP — from unified backlog to 10-day sprint cadence to veto power rules. What's inside: • Dual-layer Kanban system (master backlog + sprint board with unified tagging) • 10-day sprint standard process (Day 1 dev → Day 6 testable build → Day 10 ship) • Issue template with reproducibility requirements (3x reported = auto-severe) • Tri-party alignment meetings (daily standup / sprint planning / sprint review) • Operations veto power on releases (P0 bug = block shipping) • User feedback → product iteration closed loop (beta testing + interview SOP) • Core metrics framework (acquisition → activation → retention → monetization → referral) • Technical debt management (20-30% sprint capacity reserved) • Ready-to-use templates: Bug Report, Sprint Planning, Responsibility Matrix Built from: Real product strategy meetings + beta testing frameworks. References Supabase sprint model, Manus/DeepSeek commercialization alignment. By @WeiYipei. 🇨🇳 你的研发团队在做没人要的新功能，用户反馈的 Bug 堆了三个月没人动。运营觉得研发不听用户，研发觉得运营不懂技术。这份 SOP 给你从统一看板到 10 天迭代节奏到一票否决权的完整产研运协同框架。 🇯🇵 開発チームは誰も求めていない機能を作り、ユーザーから報告されたバグは何ヶ月も放置。このSOPは、統一バックログから10日スプリント、リリース拒否権まで、プロダクト×エンジニアリング×オペレーションの完全な連携フレームワークを提供します。 🇰🇷 개발팀은 아무도 요청하지 않은 기능을 만들고, 사용자가 보고한 버그는 몇 달째 방치됩니다. 이 SOP는 통합 백로그부터 10일 스프린트, 릴리스 거부권까지 제품×개발×운영 완전 협업 프레임워크를 제공합니다. Triggers: "product ops" | "engineering operations" | "product development SOP" | "sprint planning" | "iteration management" | "cross-functional alignment" | "product engineering ops" | "dev ops collaboration" | "产研运协同" | "迭代管理" | "产品研发运营" | "プロダクト開発運営" | "제품개발운영"