1.1万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Architecture design and governance protocol for system structure, boundaries, contracts, APIs, schemas, migrations, rewrites, and long-lived codebase health. Use when designing or reviewing architecture, planning structural refactors or migrations, governing tech debt, or containing rewrite risk. Keeps the load-bearing spine small, owned, checked, and deletable over time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a research project as a folder on disk — open the run root first, record the user's own instruction verbatim, open the two frame gates and stop for the human to answer them, and keep the stage the ledger says it is. Use when the user asks to start, resume or check a research run, a paper, a review, a brief, a report, a literature review or a protocol.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Record the statements a journal requires and a reader checks — authors with their CRediT contributions, ethics approval that names the body and the reference number, how consent was taken, funding with grant numbers, conflicts of interest, data availability with an address or a reason, and the use of generative AI — as a validated record that the submission folder prints and the manuscript never carries. Use when a run is heading for submission, when an author asks who should be listed, when consent, approval or data sharing has to be stated, or when the venue's AI policy comes up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Get literature into a research run when the plugin fetches nothing — fetch the source yourself with web_fetch / web_search or take a file the person already has, READ it with the pdf_* tools or ocr, then ingest record and text together with rs_cite, bind locators, and cite with [@key]. Use when a run needs sources, when a library export has to come in, when a citation key is unknown, or when a claim cannot be checked against a source.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Work the prototyping lab itself — where runs live, what a run is, how to promote a run into the checked example library, and how to add a new runtime (Processing in Rust, Cinder) in one module. Use when asked to add a language or framework to the lab, to turn a prototype into a reusable example, to find or tidy what is in the lab, or when the lab's folder or catalog needs explaining.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create concise checklist cheatsheets from official tool docs. Use for docs URLs, setup guides, or updating existing cheatsheets. Don't use for long tutorials or API references.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit code, docs, tests, and registries against the Constitution, ADRs, and decision map without making broad repairs. Use when checking whether the repository is drifting away from accepted architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Update docs, playbooks, shims, generated docs, and alignment checks so public instructions route to the right canonical sources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run and interpret Clawix UI geometry, screenshot, protected-surface, and debt-baseline checks without authorizing visual repair.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load when asked to review a local diff/change set for correctness, regressions, blast radius, affected flows, and missing tests using the knowledge graph; use `review-pr` for intent/checklist/merge-gate evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load for authentication or authorization changes involving BFF cookies/tokens, JWT validation, claims/user ID extraction, policies, handler access checks, impersonation, or 401/403 bugs; not for UI affordance gating alone.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Determine whether an app is ready to submit, then drive the current App Store release flow with asc, including validation, staging, review submission, first-time availability, subscriptions, IAP, Game Center, and App Privacy checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Uses the gh-axi CLI for GitHub shell operations: issue, pull request, workflow run, release, repo, search, and API tasks. Prefer this over regular `gh` for GitHub reads and simple mutations when an agent needs compact, structured, suggestion-rich output. Triggers on: gh, GitHub CLI, github issue, github pr, pull request, workflow run, github release, gh api, repo inspection, list PRs, view issue, check workflow runs, inspect repo, GitHub shell operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advisory checkpoint for deciding whether planning-document edits should be split into a separate planning branch/PR. Use only when the user explicitly asks where to commit `memory/SPEC.md` or `memory/PLAN.md` changes, mentions planning-doc merge conflicts, asks for a planning PR, or instructs you to prepare/submit one. Do not trigger for ordinary ln-* planning edits, one-line status updates, or routine canonical reconciliation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Throwaway design probe for logic, state models, UI variations, and affordances before production work. Use when the user wants to prototype, sanity-check a model, make something playable, compare UI directions, or explore a design before ln-spec/ln-plan/ln-scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chrome DevTools CLI for browser automation via shell commands. Use when interacting with web pages from the command line — navigating, clicking, filling forms, inspecting console/network, taking screenshots, or extracting page content. Triggers on: browse a page, automate Chrome, inspect console, check network requests, take a screenshot, fill a form, click a button.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Econometrics skill for OLS regression and linear models. Activates when the user asks about: "run OLS", "linear regression", "ordinary least squares", "interpret regression results", "heteroskedasticity", "multicollinearity", "regression assumptions", "robust standard errors", "GLS", "WLS", "fit a regression model", "check regression diagnostics", "OLS假设", "最小二乘法", "线性回归", "回归系数", "残差检验", "异方差", "多重共线性", "普通最小二乘", "稳健标准误", "回归诊断"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Upscale and prepare a selected video parent for delivery while preserving provenance and checking that enhancement did not create new defects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the FAA AMS Lifecycle V&V Guidelines (verification and validation), Version 3.0, dated April 2017. Use for applying verification and validation across the FAA Acquisition Management System (AMS) lifecycle: the verify-vs-validate distinction (built right vs. right thing), the work-product/component/product tiers, the nine V&V planning elements, the four method catalogs (Appendix C), decision-point-gated V&V (SASP, CRD, Investment Analysis, Solution Implementation, In-Service Management), the Appendix B document checklists (PRD/APB/ISPD/PMP), and the DT/OT/IOA test triad. Scope limits: this is an FAA acquisition-V&V doctrine, NOT a general SE process model, requirements-engineering manual, or test-design textbook. It borrows its core V&V definitions from CMMI v1.2 (SEI, paraphrased) and presumes the surrounding AMS lifecycle (see the FAA SEM pack); its phase tables are policy snapshots as of April 2017 and it is thin on detailed test methods, tool specifics, and anything outside FAA acquisition governance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the NASA Schedule Management Handbook (2024 edition, Revision 2). Use for program/project schedule management of aerospace and large engineering efforts: the five sub-functions (Planning, Development, Assessment & Analysis, Maintenance & Control, Documentation & Communication); the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and the WBS/OBS/CBS breakdown structures; the Schedule Management Plan (SMP) and Basis of Estimate (BoE); Critical Path Method, logic, durations, float and margin; tiered schedule assessment (Requirements/Health/Basis checks, the Shock Test) and the Dimensions of Schedule Reliability; Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA), Integrated Cost-Schedule Risk Analysis (ICSRA), Monte Carlo, correlation, merge bias, and the Joint Confidence Level (JCL); baselining, replan vs. rebaseline, EVM schedule metrics (SPI, BEI, CEI, HMI, Earned Schedule, CPLI), and status/progress/forecast reporting. This is NASA's scheduling doctrine grounded in NPR 7120.5 and the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide. Thin on the underlying mechanics of CPM, statistics, and EVM (it points to companion handbooks); aerospace/space-flight-centric; anchored to the 2024 second edition.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the GAO Agile Assessment Guide (GAO-24-105506, 2023). Use for assessing and managing Agile software development in federal programs: the Agile Manifesto and framework family (Scrum, Kanban, XP, SAFe, DA, DSDM, Lean, DevOps); the three adoption perspectives (team dynamics, program operations, organization environment); requirements decomposition (epics, features, user stories, INVEST, MoSCoW, definition of done); Agile-aware federal contracting (FAR, modular contracting, SOO/PWS/SOW, product owner vs. COR); program monitoring and control (WBS, cost, schedule, EVM at the feature level); Agile metrics (velocity, lead/cycle time, CFD, burn charts); and the auditor's key-question bank. Oversight- and acquisition-oriented: it tells you how to *assess and govern* Agile programs, not how to code. Thin on hands-on engineering practice, deep cost/schedule checklists (see gao-cost, gao-schedule), and any non-US-federal context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply to multi-step work (sweeps, migrations, runs of similar edits) and to how you stack commits and PRs. Break work into small units that each end in a verifiable state, check each before the next, and order delivery so the sequence proves itself to a reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply to any non-trivial work, not just bulk work: edits, migrations, analyses, checks. Build the tool that does it or proves it (codemod, script, generator, or a skill your subagents follow) instead of working by hand. The tool is the artifact a reviewer can rerun.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply when debugging. Trace each symptom to its root cause and fix it there; reproduce first, ask why until you reach it, resist nil-check guards that silence crashes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。