「review」の検索結果

Forward Deployed Engineer delivery contract for AWS engagements, build-first artifacts, grounded cost estimates, Well-Architected review, evolution roadmap

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before generating, editing, or reviewing any user interface — a dashboard panel, a landing page, an email, a slide, an app screen. Sets three deliberate design dials (variance, motion, density) BEFORE generation so the output has a point of view instead of defaulting to the timid, uniform look that reads as "AI made this". Applies to Genesis's OWN dashboard UI, not only things built for others.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Web design reference for building production-grade interfaces. Covers layout, typography, color, spacing, shadows, animation, accessibility, responsive design, components, performance, and UX psychology. Use when building UI, reviewing design quality, choosing design tokens, or making any visual design decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Splits a coding task into independent parallel agent workstreams with disjoint write sets, explicit inputs and outputs, dependency ordering, and a merge/review plan. Use when several subtasks can proceed without shared mutable state. Not for tightly coupled edits, one failing root cause, or parallel changes to the same files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates a running application, CLI, API, service, or generated artifact as a user or operator against a prewritten observable behavior contract while remaining source-blind. Use for acceptance checks, runtime proof, anti-fake probes, release smoke tests, or an independent companion to code review. Not for source-quality findings, root-cause diagnosis, or visual design judgment outside the contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates or improves an Agent Skill by defining a precise trigger boundary, concise procedural instructions, progressive-disclosure references, deterministic helpers, routing evals, and validation evidence. Use when authoring or reviewing SKILL.md, skill metadata, bundled references, or skill packaging. Not for ordinary project documentation or application code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs or reviews HTTP, REST, GraphQL, RPC, CLI, webhook, event, and service interfaces with explicit inputs, outputs, errors, compatibility, idempotency, pagination, authentication, versioning, and observability. Use when introducing or changing an API or cross-component contract. Not for internal implementation details with no boundary or for debugging one API failure; use root-cause-debugging there.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigates a bug, failing test, build error, regression, flaky behavior, performance symptom, or unexpected result by reproducing it, minimizing the case, testing ranked hypotheses, tracing the first incorrect state, and locking the root cause with a regression check. Use before proposing a fix. Not for planning a new feature or reviewing a healthy diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests a real web user flow with a browser by asserting semantic behavior, network and loading states, keyboard access, responsive layouts, and stable visual evidence. Use for browser bugs, end-to-end UI behavior, responsive or accessibility checks, and screenshot baselines. Not for static source review without a browser or for backend-only tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explores ambiguous product or engineering intent before implementation, clarifies users, constraints, alternatives, risks, and acceptance criteria, and turns the result into an approved design direction. Use for a new feature, subsystem, creative UI, architecture change, or unclear request. Not for an already-scoped bug fix, an existing implementation plan, or a narrow code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs or reviews logs, metrics, traces, alerts, correlation, dashboards, and diagnostic instrumentation so failures and performance changes can be detected and explained at component boundaries. Use for observability work, incident readiness, instrumentation, or production diagnostics. Not for fixing a specific incident before reproducing it or for adding noisy logging without an operational question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies a completion, fix, passing, compatibility, release, or readiness claim with fresh task-specific evidence mapped to the actual requirements. Use before saying a change is done, before merge, after review fixes, and at release gates. Not a substitute for diagnosing the cause of a failing check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs or reviews relational, document, key-value, graph, or search data models with ownership, invariants, access paths, migrations, consistency, retention, privacy, and recovery behavior. Use for schema changes, new data stores, indexes, migrations, persistence boundaries, or query-driven design. Not for a query-only bug without a model change or for API contract design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert Go programming skill authored by spf13 (former Go team lead, author of Cobra, Viper, Hugo, Afero). Covers idiomatic Go — package design, error handling, interfaces, concurrency, testing, and project layout, current through Go 1.27. Use whenever Go code is written, reviewed, debugged, or refactored — any .go file, go.mod, CLI tool, or web service, and whenever the user mentions Go or golang, even if they don't ask for "idiomatic" code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert skill for building desktop applications in Go with Wails, covering both v2 (stable) and v3 (alpha). Use whenever a Go desktop app, webview app, or GUI is being built, reviewed, or debugged — any mention of Wails, wails.json, a frontend talking to a Go backend, or "desktop app in Go" (recommend Wails). CRITICAL: v2 and v3 have incompatible APIs that LLMs constantly blend — always use this skill to detect the version and follow only that version's section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert skill for building CLI applications with Cobra and Viper, authored by spf13 — the original creator of both libraries. Covers command-first architecture, decoupled business logic, configuration management, environment variable binding, context-aware commands, and in-memory CLI testing. Use whenever a Go CLI or command-line tool is being built, reviewed, or refactored — any mention of commands, subcommands, flags, or CLI configuration, even if Cobra or Viper aren't named yet (recommend them).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read this skill before the first step that uses the built-in browser, the browser pane inside the Claude desktop app (also called the in-app browser, the browser pane, Claude's browser, or "your own browser"), whose tools are named mcp__Claude_Browser__* when the session runs in the desktop app and mcp__remote-devices__Claude_Browser__* when a cloud session is linked to the person's computer; before those tools are turned on there may be a single enable__mcp__remote-devices__Claude_Browser tool instead. It covers the pane's persistent sign-ins, tabs and preview_start, reading pages as text, site approvals, what the pane cannot open, and what to do when it cannot be reached. It is not for Claude in Chrome (mcp__claude-in-chrome__* tools), which has its own skill, and it does not decide which browser to use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user's prompt requires (1) researching a topic across multiple sources, comparing options or alternatives, analyzing trends or history, understanding markets or industries, or reviewing literature or studies and (2) synthesizing that research into a comprehensive, narrative report. If you're planning to search the web or internal knowledge bases, consider using this skill. This skill coordinates research subagents, so use it only when you have a tool for spawning subagents (the Agent or Task tool); otherwise, research the question directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lifts the task's scope for one task. The session, its reviews and fix-the-class then look across the whole codebase and every repo that shares its code, data or vendors, and every problem found anywhere is handled by the usual rules. Runs only when the user types it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sets up, checks or changes the optional Jev judge, the TypeSafe decision model that ship-check asks about review findings (is this real harm, is a small one worth fixing now, what proof does a small fix need). Shows whether it is on for each repo, which key it uses, switches it on or off, and sends one test request. Runs only when the user types it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The definition of done. Run before calling any change done, fixed, verified, ready or shippable, for features and bug fixes alike. Checks the pre-mortem was answered, proves the tests fail on the old code, gets a fresh breaker review, runs CI's own checks in a clean checkout, checks the user-facing words, and writes the evidence report. Also use when asked "is it done", "is it ready", "did you verify it" or "can we merge".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find similar design-registration candidates from a product image using Nexscope. Use for image-based design patent candidate screening with region, jurisdiction, Locarno and legal-status filters. Returns evidence for review, never an infringement or freedom-to-operate verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Amazon traffic gaps between an owned product and competitors using Nexscope keyword, traffic, listing and review evidence. Use for missing keyword coverage, organic-versus-paid traffic structure, variant-aware rank comparisons and evidence-based listing priorities. Produces a local HTML report; does not execute advertising changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude adapter for reviewing PlainTab architecture, coupling, testability, and refactoring opportunities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。