9,874 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Review a single academic paper, preprint, DOI, arXiv link, or user-provided PDF/text with source-grounded critique. Use for paper summaries, methodology review, novelty checks, reproducibility concerns, or "review this paper" requests; do not use for multi-paper surveys, systematic literature reviews, citation management, or implementation from a paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optional focused post-implementation review routing. Use only when the user requests review or the changed surface has a clear specialist evidence need that direct diff inspection and the smallest relevant check cannot cover. Never creates an automatic review swarm.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze source data, tables, CSV/XLSX extracts, metrics, or experiment results with explicit data-authenticity checks. Use for profiling, cleaning assumptions, statistical summaries, segmentation, trend analysis, or "analyze this data"; do not use for spreadsheet file surgery, chart design only, database migrations, or claims without data provenance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repair one concrete reproducible build, typecheck, lint, test, packaging, or CI failure with a bounded root-cause-first loop; do not trigger for runtime bugs without a failing gate, broad test strategy, dependency/toolchain migration, or generic implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a Go design spec before implementation begins - dispatch a subagent that checks a design doc for completeness, consistency, and idiomatic Go (simplicity, small consumer-defined interfaces, explicit wrapped errors, context propagation) plus Cobra/Viper conventions where applicable. Use when a user has a Go spec to review, asks "is this spec ready?", or is about to implement from a written design. Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo's conventions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects leaked API keys, tokens, passwords, and credentials in code with pre-commit hooks, CI checks, scanning rules, and remediation procedures. Use for "secret scanning", "credential detection", "API key leaks", or "secret management".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically categorizes test failures, suggests responsible owners, and provides common fix checklists. Generates actionable test reports with failure analysis. Use for "test reporting", "failure triage", "test analysis", or "test automation".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements security headers and Content Security Policy with safe rollout strategy (report-only → enforce), testing, and compatibility checks. Use for "security headers", "CSP", "HTTP headers", or "XSS protection".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, validate, and plan a startup from scratch. Covers market research, competitive analysis, business model, brand identity, product definition, financial projections, and validation experiments. Trigger when the user has a startup idea to explore, wants to validate a business concept, needs a business plan or lean canvas, asks for market sizing or competitive landscape, wants brand positioning or go-to-market strategy, or says anything like "I have an idea for..." or "is this idea worth pursuing". Also handles resuming from a previous checkpoint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ensures tenant isolation at query and policy level using Row Level Security, automated testing, and security audits. Prevents data leakage between tenants. Use for "multi-tenancy", "tenant isolation", "RLS", or "data security".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements role-based access control with permission matrix, route guards, policy functions, and UI permission hints. Provides middleware/guards, helper utilities, test suggestions, and permission checking patterns. Use when building "RBAC", "permissions", "access control", or "authorization".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits project dependencies for outdated packages, duplicates, heavy/problematic libraries, security vulnerabilities, and risky version combinations. Generates prioritized reports with security, performance, and maintainability insights, upgrade paths, and safe pinning recommendations. Use when users request dependency audits, package updates, security checks, or dependency optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds multi-step forms with validation schemas (Zod/Yup), step components, shared state management, progress indicators, review steps, and error handling. Use when creating "multi-step forms", "wizard flows", "onboarding forms", or "checkout processes".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converts documents into clean, chunked datasets suitable for embeddings and vector search. Produces chunked JSONL files with metadata, deduplication logic, and quality checks. Use when preparing "training data", "vector datasets", "document processing", or "embedding data".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Anti-slop frontend skill for landing pages, portfolios, and redesigns. The agent reads the brief, infers the right design direction, and ships interfaces that do not look templated. Real design systems when applicable, audit-first on redesigns, strict pre-flight check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits and implements web accessibility (a11y) following WCAG 2.1 guidelines with ARIA patterns, keyboard navigation, screen reader support, and contrast checking. Use when users request "accessibility audit", "a11y review", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", or "keyboard navigation".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Defines caching strategies with cache keys, TTL values, invalidation triggers, consistency patterns, and correctness checklist. Provides code examples for Redis, CDN, and application-level caching. Use when implementing "caching", "performance optimization", "cache strategy", or "Redis caching".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates comprehensive disaster recovery procedures with automated backup scripts, restore procedures, validation checks, and role assignments. Use for "database backup", "disaster recovery", "data restore", or "DR planning".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a running Spark or DSH web service needs real-browser verification — page load, client-plugin boot errors, console errors, failed requests, or onboarding/dialog rendering — with the repository's own Playwright chromium.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when selecting a statistical test with AI consultation, when assumptions need checking against the actual data, when an analysis plan or decision log must be written before running anything, or when results need APA-style reporting with effect sizes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building slides, a poster, or a lightning talk from a manuscript, when a presentation must exist in Turkish and English, or when conference visuals need a traceability check so every number on a slide matches the analysis behind it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a high-stakes analysis, citation set, or decision should be checked by a second independent AI agent that verifies rather than decides, or when disagreement between agents must be surfaced for the human to adjudicate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when coding interviews, focus groups, or open-ended responses with AI assistance, when a codebook needs building or auditing, when intercoder reliability must be computed, or when qualitative quotes need integrity checks before publication.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when choosing or configuring MCP servers for research work, when a literature, reference manager, or scholarly search server needs a trust check before installation, or when an existing research tool stack needs a data flow and permission audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。