Prüft bereitgestellte Formularbeschreibungen auf Struktur, Validierung, Verständlichkeit und Barrierefreiheit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
1,110 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Prüft bereitgestellte Formularbeschreibungen auf Struktur, Validierung, Verständlichkeit und Barrierefreiheit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for release-level accessibility and performance review, including WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard/focus, target size, reduced motion, semantic controls, Core Web Vitals, images/fonts/JavaScript, and animation or 3D performance budgets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a live page for accessibility issues, locate each WCAG violation precisely, and return a selector-grounded fix worklist without editing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diff a live page's accessibility violations against a baseline — by default compares uncommitted changes (stash-based), or pass --branch [<name>] to diff against a branch. Reports only new violation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and fix WCAG 2.2 accessibility issues. Two modes — report (sweep a codebase or page, produce a prioritized written report, no edits) and fix (audit→edit→verify loop on a target). Prefers di
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run or interpret bounded multi-page Unlighthouse audits for local Lighthouse evidence. Use for site-wide performance, accessibility, best-practice, and SEO regression checks when field data or API quotas are insufficient.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "build the email HTML", "make this email responsive", "fix dark-mode rendering", or "QA the email across clients"; produces the coded HTML build — a responsive table layout, dark-mode + accessibility pass, a client-render matrix, image-block fallbacks, and a plain-text parity check. Not for writing the copy — use email-creative-builder; not for scoring the email or computing EQS — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件HTML/响应式邮件/暗色模式渲染
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit paid-ad copy, images, video, hooks, concepts, format coverage, platform-native fit, message match, creative fatigue, accessibility, and policy across supported platforms. Use for creative audit, ad creative, creative fatigue, creative diversity, ad copy review, video review, image review, or production priorities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit paid-ad landing pages for message match, mobile experience, performance, accessibility, trust, forms, consent, tracking, security, and conversion friction. Use for landing-page audit, post-click experience, LP audit, conversion-rate optimization, form optimization, ad-to-page message match, redirects, blocked navigation, or requests involving private, loopback, link-local, or metadata IP destinations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
legacy workaround を避け、semantic HTML / Web Platform Native API / modern CSS の利用機会を提示する。
フロントエンド観点のレビューエージェント。 アクセシビリティ、デザインシステム準拠、Tailwind クラス衛生、UI 状態設計、 Next.js / React Router のフレームワーク境界を個別スキルへルーティングする。
画像・ボタン・フォーム要素に適切なアクセシブルネームがあるか確認する。
Audit OpenClaw frontend code and rendered interfaces for Carapace drift, token misuse, primitive reimplementation, accessibility problems, responsive defects, and off-brand copy. Use for design reviews, compliance checks, or scheduled audit-and-fix workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level guidance for Flutter production applications: architecture decisions (Clean/Layered/Hexagonal/Feature-First), advanced state management (BLoC/Riverpod/GetX), performance optimization (eliminating jank, memory profiling, reducing rebuild overhead), code review with design pattern enforcement, scalability assessments, native platform integration (MethodChannel/EventChannel/FFI), complex UI challenges (custom render objects, slivers), testing strategies (unit/widget/integration/golden), CI/CD pipeline architecture, build optimization, and accessibility compliance. Triggers: 'architecture decision', 'design pattern', 'performance issue', 'code review', 'production problem', 'scaling concerns', 'best practices', 'technical debt', 'refactoring strategy'. Essential for complex enterprise apps, critical production debugging, architectural refactors, or when choosing between competing technical approaches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break a user interface under real-world conditions across responsiveness, hostile content, interaction states, accessibility, network failure, interruption, and complete user journeys, reporting observable user harm with evidence rather than aesthetic opinion. Use whenever the user wants to stress-test a UI, verify responsive and edge-case behaviour, inspect loading/error/empty/recovery states, review a flow for friction, or find where an interface fails under reality. Part of the audit suite; inherits the shared constitution while its own job is proving observable user harm.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-driven application audit protocol for security, authorization, privacy, concurrency, state integrity, reliability, performance, accessibility, visual consistency, responsive behavior, and release readiness. Use for incremental checks, pre-merge review, pre-launch audits, high-stakes deep audits, AI-generated code review, hardening, or release-gate design. Prefer this protocol over ad-hoc review when the user asks whether software is safe or ready to ship.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds native iOS apps in Swift — SwiftUI and UIKit screens, state and data flow, NavigationStack, lists, forms and accessibility; networking with URLSession and Codable, persistence with SwiftData, Core Data, files and the Keychain; permissions, push notifications, universal links, background tasks, widgets, App Intents and StoreKit 2 purchases; performance with Instruments and MetricKit; and release with signing, TestFlight and App Store Connect. Use when writing or changing native iOS code, adding a platform feature, preparing a build for TestFlight or the App Store, or when the user asks how to do something on iOS, even if they do not name the framework.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds React Native and Expo apps in TypeScript — navigation with React Navigation or Expo Router, lists, forms, styling, gestures and animations with Reanimated, safe areas, accessibility and localization; networking with TanStack Query, response validation, persistence with MMKV, AsyncStorage, SQLite and secure storage; permissions, push notifications, deep links, background tasks, native modules and config plugins; performance with Hermes and the React profiler; and release with EAS Build, EAS Submit and EAS Update or bare Gradle and Xcode builds. Use when writing or changing React Native code, adding a native capability, configuring Expo, preparing a store build or an over-the-air update, or when the user asks how to do something in React Native, even if they do not name the library.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds Flutter apps with guides for everything specific to Flutter and Dart — layouts, responsive UI, forms, animations, theming, declarative routing with go_router, widget previews and home screen widgets; HTTP, JSON serialization, local databases and caching; plugins, platform channels and native views; isolates and app size; accessibility and localization; Effective Dart, Dart 3 features and pattern matching; and macOS setup. Use when writing or changing Flutter UI, data or native integration code, or when the user asks how to do something in Flutter, even if they do not name the topic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Works on Kotlin Multiplatform mobile projects with shared Kotlin source sets and Android/iOS targets. Use for architecture, tests, debugging, reviews, performance, security, accessibility, dependencies and releases when `org.jetbrains.kotlin.multiplatform` is applied; inspect actual targets, `commonMain`/`commonTest`, target source sets, Compose Multiplatform and the iOS framework/host app before giving platform advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review or design FriendlyBet user experience, visual direction, mobile-first flows, premium sports interface, Hebrew/English copy fit, RTL behavior, accessibility, interaction patterns, and product UI polish. Use when a task touches screens, flows, layout, visual hierarchy, onboarding, prediction UX, share UX, or design quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes genetic variant effects on gene expression (RNA-seq), chromatin accessibility (DNASE), histone marks (ChIP), and transcription factors using the AlphaGenome API. Use when the user asks about non-coding variant effects, pathogenicity, clinical significance, disease associations, functional effects, gene expression changes, splicing disruption, or regulatory effects in promoters and enhancers. Also use for resolving biological terms to tissue/cell-type ontologies (UBERON/CL) or analyzing variants in chr:pos:ref>alt format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。