6,025 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
- Verify whether an image or video is authentic, original and correctly captioned — provenance checks, error level analysis, noise and JPEG compression analysis, clone and copy-move detection, lighting and shadow consistency, C2PA… Use when fact-checking a photo or video, checking for a deepfake or AI-generated image, spotting manipulation, or testing whether footage is recycled or miscaptioned
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
- Find leaked or mentioned selectors circulating in pastes, leak forums, Telegram channels and dump markets, and judge whether a claimed leak is genuine or a recycled combolist. Use when checking whether a name, email, domain or credential is circulating, verifying a breach claim made against your organisation, or setting up ongoing leak monitoring
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
- Trace cryptocurrency addresses and transactions on public blockchains using block explorers including Etherscan, Blockchair, mempool.space and Blockscout. Use when following a Bitcoin or Ethereum wallet, investigating where a ransom or scam payment went, or checking an address against sanctions listings
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Register a custom WooCommerce shipping provider — extend AbstractShippingProvider and add it via the woocommerce_fulfillment_shipping_providers filter (WC 10.1+). Distinct from shipping methods (rate at checkout) — a provider is a carrier identity (UPS, FedEx, DHL, your custom carrier) used by the Fulfillments system for tracking URLs, tracking-number pattern detection, country-pair support, and the orders-list filter. Required methods get_key / get_name / get_icon / get_tracking_url, with optional shipping-from / shipping-to / try_parse_tracking_number. Registration accepts class names (resolved via the DI container) or pre-built instances, keyed by get_key. Use when integrating a private carrier, fulfillment service, or any tracking-aware shipping identity. Triggers on AbstractShippingProvider, woocommerce_fulfillment_shipping_providers, FulfillmentUtils::get_shipping_providers, "shipping provider" in WooCommerce context, or carrier tracking integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Register a custom Listings callback for JetEngine — the per-field transform fired when a Dynamic Field widget renders meta values (Format date, Format number, Get post title, Convert units, …). Two registration paths are supported. Legacy 3-filter via jet-engine/listings/allowed-callbacks (label), jet-engine/listings/allowed-callbacks-args (control schema), and jet-engine/listing/dynamic-field/callback-args (positional args at runtime). Modern single-call $manager->register_callback($name, $label, $args) hooked on jet-engine/callbacks/register fires the three filters internally for you. Critical contract — the callback identifier you register MUST be a real PHP callable string (a global function name OR `Fully\\Qualified\\Class::method`). Bare static method names like `'unit_converter'` fail JE's is_callable() gate at apply_callback() and the rendered field silently becomes empty. Use when scaffolding a JetEngine companion plugin's listing-field transform, when seeing "callback appl...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates whether an API request is correct based on provided inputs (method, URL, headers, body, auth, query params).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive Domain-Driven Design modeling sessions based on DDD Distilled (Vaughn Vernon) and Domain Modeling Made Functional (Scott Wlaschin). Guides users through strategic and tactical design via 13 phases: discover, storming, contexts, mapping, aggregates, events, validate, glossary, workflows, types, simulate, publish, sync. Phase 13 (sync) reconciles divergences found by --analyze between the domain model and the implementation — judging whether the model or the code is authoritative, then planning and implementing the fix and re-aligning the model. Phases 9-11 take the conceptual model from phases 1-8 and produce workflow pipeline designs, compilable type definitions (TypeScript, Kotlin, Scala, Rust, C#, F#), workflow verification via type-level tests, and automatic UI field enumeration from the domain model. Phase 12 (publish) renders all docs/domain artifacts into one self-contained, cross-linked HTML site (separate files joined by a shared nav). Each phase is an interactive dialogue where AI acts as facilitator and domain expert challenger. Use when: "DDD", "ドメイン設計", "ドメインモデリング", "Event Storming", "Bounded Context", "集約設計", "ユビキタス言語", "コンテキストマップ", "ワークフロー設計", "パイプライン設計", "ステップ分割", "中間型", "型駆動フロー", "型駆動設計", "Domain Modeling Made Functional", "Railway Oriented Programming", "入力画面項目", "フォーム項目洗い出し", "UI 項目抽出", "HTMLにまとめる", "ドキュメントサイト化", "成果物を1つのHTMLに", "publish", "モデルと実装の差異", "差異解消", "実装との乖離", "モデルとコードを一致", "差異の実装計画", "sync", "複数フェーズを逐次実行", "フェーズをまとめて実行", "/ddd run", "サブコマンド一覧", "/ddd list", "/ddd", "ドメイン分析したい", "モデリングしたい", or any domain design / type modeling activity.
Map and attack the authentication, authorization, session, tenant, federation, and machine-identity boundaries of a system, proving whether access controls actually hold rather than whether they appear to. Use whenever work touches login, sessions, tokens, roles, permissions, multi-tenancy, password reset, invitations, OAuth/OIDC/SAML, API keys, service accounts, webhooks, admin impersonation, or any question of "can this actor do or see this thing." Prefer this over a generic security pass for identity-heavy surfaces. Part of the audit suite; inherits the shared constitution while its own job is proving or disproving access boundaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a test strategy around product risk, business invariants, failure modes, and existing controls, deciding what deserves testing and at which boundary rather than maximising coverage. Use whenever the user asks how to test something, wants a test plan or strategy, is deciding between unit/integration/contract/E2E/property/concurrency testing, or wants to know whether existing tests actually protect what matters. Prefer this over writing tests immediately. Part of the audit suite; inherits the shared constitution while its own job is proving risk coverage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up Prometheus for comprehensive metric collection, storage, and monitoring of infrastructure and applications. Use when implementing metrics collection, setting up monitoring infrastructure, or configuring alerting systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply Gang of Four design patterns to solve architectural problems in TypeScript. Use when refactoring code architecture, implementing extensible systems, decoupling components, or following SOLID principles. Covers all 22 GoF patterns: Creational (Factory Method, Abstract Factory, Builder, Prototype, Singleton), Structural (Adapter, Bridge, Composite, Decorator, Facade, Flyweight, Proxy), and Behavioral (Chain of Responsibility, Command, Iterator, Mediator, Memento, Observer, State, Strategy, Template Method, Visitor).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Adyen — adyen payment platform management including merchant accounts, payment methods, terminal configuration, risk management, settlement reports, and webhook notifications. Covers authorization rates, payment method performance, fraud scoring, and payout reconciliation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert en éthique de l'IA (bias detection, fairness, explainability, responsible AI, guardrails)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert en éthique des agents IA (tests de biais, équité, transparence, explicabilité, déploiement responsable)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Name what was prioritized, what was sacrificed, and whether the tradeoff was right. Every design decision trades something. Use when evaluating design decisions, defending choices, or helping teams understand what they're giving up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ソフトウェア・エンジニアリングのための倫理集。開発時に必ず意識するものです。
Create new Claude Code Agent Skills in Japanese with proper SKILL.md format, trigger design, and evaluation methods. Triggers on requests for スキル作成, 新しいスキルを作る, SKILL.md作成, Agent Skill テンプレート, スキルの書き方.
Use when turning something that happened into something that makes the next run better - "write a retro", "record this paper cut", "this bug escaped verification", "make this an eval", "why do we keep hitting this", "did that change actually help", "scorecard", "what did we learn from that run", "lessons keep getting re-learned". Covers the six-step loop (capture, classify, convert, change, measure, retro), the repo artifact each step produces, and how escaped bugs become eval cases. Do NOT use to design or judge a single workflow experiment (see `workflow-experimentation`, which this loop feeds), to decide where to run work (see `dogfooding`), or to debug one failed execution in the moment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "follow red team methodology", "perform bug bounty hunting", "automate reconnaissance", "hunt for XSS vulnerabilities", "enumerate subdomains", or needs security researcher techniques and tool configurations from top bug bounty hunters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ペネトレーションテストを対話的に実行するスキル。認可確認(Authorization Gate)→カテゴリ選択（Methodology, Reconnaissance, Scanning, VulnerabilityScanning, WebAppTesting, APITesting, PasswordAttacks, Exploitation, PrivilegeEscalation, ActiveDirectory, PostExploitation, WirelessAttacks, NetworkAttacks, SocialEngineering, CloudPentesting, MobileAppTesting, ContainerK8s, BinaryExploitation, OWASPTop10, Reporting, EmailSecurity, DatabaseAttacks, VPNRemoteAccess の全23カテゴリ）→ツール選択→コマンド実行→発見記録(Finding)→レポート生成をステップバイステップで進行。スコープ/除外チェック・ガードレール付き。「ペンテスト実行」「pentest」「侵入テスト」「脆弱性診断」「セキュリティテスト」「pentest executor」で発火。
Multi-timeframe crypto technical analysis with scored trading signals, structured trade plans, and position sizing via Binance public API. Use when user asks to "analyze BTC", "what's the signal on ETH/USDT", "crypto analysis", "trade setup for SOL", "scan crypto pairs", "check the trend on BTC", "multi-timeframe analysis", "generate a trading signal", "what's the bias on ETH", "TA on BTC/USDT", "is it a good time to buy BTC", or "position size for a crypto trade".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure any communication artifact — documents, reports, plans, issue comments, PR descriptions, emails, presentations, slides, charts, and dashboards — using Jean-luc Doumont's "Trees, Maps, and Theorems" method. Use whenever the goal is to get a message across to a busy audience, when asked to improve clarity or structure of writing or slides, or when a deliverable will be judged by whether readers act on it, not just read it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspects PostHog Visual Review (VR) runs that gate PR merges with screenshot regression checks. Use when the user mentions "visual review", "VR", "snapshot diff", "screenshot test", "storybook regression", "playwright snapshot", asks why a PR is blocked or what changed visually, wants to triage the VR backlog, decide whether a snapshot diff is real vs flaky, or check whether a story has been changing across runs. Also invoke when a PR has a failing `visual-review` status check, when a PR comment mentions "Visual review", or when the user is on a branch with an open VR run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。