「experiment」の検索結果

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when introducing a feature flag system, choosing between release flags / experiment flags / operational flags / kill switches / permission flags, designing percentage rollouts, building kill-switch + circuit-breaker patterns, structuring evaluation contexts (user IDs, plan tier, region), or building flag-cleanup discipline. Triggers: LaunchDarkly / GrowthBook / Unleash / Flagsmith / OpenFeature, percentage ramp, sticky bucketing, kill switch wired to alerting, "we still have flags from 2 years ago", flag debt, OpenFeature provider, evaluation context, default value on provider failure. NOT for A/B test statistical analysis (separate skill), traffic-split routing at the edge, build-time bundler defines, or environment-based config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Differential abundance (DA) and differential state (DS) analysis for flow and mass cytometry - tests which cell populations change in frequency or marker expression between conditions using diffcyt (edgeR/voom/GLMM for DA, limma/LMM for DS), with cydar, CITRUS, and compositional methods (sccomp, scCODA, DCATS) as alternatives. Covers the sample-is-the-experimental-unit principle, design/contrast and mixed-model formulas, compositionality of cluster proportions, and FDR across clusters. Use when comparing populations between groups, choosing a DA method, handling paired/batch designs, or deciding whether compositional correction is needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build weighted gene co-expression networks to identify modules of co-regulated genes, relate them to phenotypes, and find hub genes using WGCNA, hdWGCNA, MEGENA, CEMiTool, and Gaussian graphical models. Covers signed-network choice, soft-threshold selection, module preservation, and the marginal-vs-partial-correlation distinction. Use when finding co-expression modules, identifying hub genes, relating gene networks to clinical or experimental traits, or building single-cell co-expression networks. For directed TF-target inference see scenic-regulons and grn-inference; for condition rewiring see differential-networks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Controls error rates across thousands of simultaneous tests in genomics discovery using false-discovery-rate methods (Benjamini-Hochberg 1995; Benjamini-Yekutieli 2001 for arbitrary dependence; Storey q-value with pi0 estimation; local FDR; independent filtering Bourgon 2010; covariate-weighted FDR via IHW Ignatiadis 2016), plus family-wise error control (Bonferroni, Holm) and the GWAS genome-wide threshold. Covers the FDR-versus-FWER choice as the discovery-versus-confirmatory distinction, the dependence assumptions behind BH (PRDS) versus BY, pi0 estimation, the independent-filtering and false-coverage-rate traps, and reproducibility ranking via IDR (Li 2011). Use when correcting p-values from genome-wide tests, choosing between BH/BY/q-value/Bonferroni, setting an FDR threshold, applying IHW or independent filtering, or interpreting q-values. For confirmatory trials with few pre-specified endpoints (closed testing, graphical/gatekeeping), see clinical-biostatistics/multiplicity-graphical.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes pooled CRISPR screens with MAGeCK (Li et al 2014), covering count generation (mageck count), the RRA two-condition workflow (mageck test using alpha-RRA over per-sgRNA negative-binomial p-values), the MLE multi-condition workflow (mageck mle with explicit design matrix and beta-score output), normalization choice (median vs total vs control-sgRNA vs spike-in), sgRNA efficiency injection, paired-sample testing, time-course design, drug-screen versus dropout-screen design matrices, MAGeCKFlute and MAGeCK-VISPR downstream visualization, and decision logic for when to use MAGeCK vs JACKS / BAGEL2 / drugZ / Chronos. Use when running a fresh CRISPR screen analysis, picking RRA vs MLE for the experimental design, choosing a normalization method from QC signatures, debugging MLE convergence failure or NaN beta scores, comparing MAGeCK output across tools, or building a batch-aware multi-cell-line / multi-condition MLE design matrix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and analyzes in vivo CRISPR screens in animal tumor models, organoids, and immune-cell adoptive transfers. Covers bottleneck math (250x cells/sgRNA requires ~25M cells implanted; impossible for most syngeneic models, forcing focused libraries), focused library design (Manguso 2017 Nature 547:413 immune screen; Chen 2015 tumor screens), CRISPR-StAR intrinsic-control screening (Uijttewaal 2025 Nat Biotechnol 43:1848), clonal-dynamics-limited detection, tumor-explant DNA recovery, syngeneic vs xenograft vs PDX considerations, and the relationship to downstream MAGeCK / drugZ analysis. Use when designing in vivo CRISPR screens for tumor / immune / metastasis biology, choosing focused vs genome-wide for animal models, addressing bottleneck-induced clonal collapse, picking the syngeneic / xenograft / PDX model, integrating in vivo with in vitro results, or applying CRISPR-StAR for animal experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes single-cell pooled CRISPR screens (Perturb-seq, CROP-seq, Perturb-CITE-seq, ECCITE-seq, multiome) where each cell carries an sgRNA and a scRNA-seq / surface-protein / chromatin readout. Covers experimental design (direct-capture Perturb-seq Dixit 2016 vs CROP-seq 3'UTR-barcoded Datlinger 2017 vs ECCITE-seq vs Multiome), MOI for sgRNA assignment, escaper-cell filtering (Mixscape, Papalexi 2021), SCEPTRE NB GLM + permutation for low-MOI (Barry 2024 Genome Biol 25:124), the Pertpy framework, factor decomposition, genome-scale Perturb-seq (Replogle 2022 Cell, 2.5M cells), and per-perturbation single-cell DE. Use when running a single-cell CRISPR screen, choosing direct-capture vs CROP-seq architecture, filtering escaper cells, performing single-cell DE, integrating Perturb-seq with pathway analysis, scaling to GW CRISPRi via Replogle protocol, or analyzing multi-omics screens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify differentially bound regions across CLIP-seq conditions (knockdown vs control, treatment vs vehicle, disease vs healthy) using DEWSeq (sliding-window DESeq2), Flipper (Skipper-downstream), ASpeak, edgeR, or limma-voom. Use when computing condition-level changes in RBP binding intensity, choosing peak-level vs window-level vs crosslink-level testing, designing replicate experiments, or distinguishing biological binding shifts from technical confounders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Predict RBP binding from RNA sequence using deep learning models (RBPNet sequence-to-signal, RNAProt RNN, GraphProt2 GCN with structure, DeepCLIP, DeepRiPe multi-modal CNN) for variant-effect prediction, in silico binding-site discovery, model interpretation, and transfer learning from CLIP and RBNS datasets. Use when computational prediction of RBP binding from sequence is needed, evaluating variant effects on binding without further wet-lab experiments, comparing model performance, or training a custom model on ENCODE eCLIP data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-method decision tree for calling hits in pooled CRISPR screens. Catalogs statistical models (MAGeCK RRA, MAGeCK MLE, BAGEL2, drugZ, JACKS, Chronos, CERES), experimental designs each is built for, failure modes outside design domain, reconciliation when methods disagree, multiple-testing and effect-size thresholds, the order of operations (count -> QC -> CN-correct -> hit-call -> validate), the second-best-sgRNA conservative rule, and consensus-hit strategy. Use when choosing among MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / drugZ / JACKS / Chronos for a given design, reconciling disagreement across two or three methods on the same screen, deciding whether to require consensus, gating downstream validation by hit-confidence tier, or interpreting unstable hit lists across reruns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies differentially bound ChIP-seq regions between conditions using DiffBind, csaw (sliding windows), DESeq2/edgeR/PyDESeq2 on count matrices, NormR (control-aware), or MAnorm2. Distinguishes three distinct normalization problems (composition bias, trended bias, global shifts) and matches each to its appropriate fix including spike-in scaling. Use when comparing ChIP-seq binding between experimental conditions, choosing normalization for global vs local changes, integrating spike-in data, or reconciling DiffBind/DESeq2 disagreement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Visualizes ChIP-seq data using deepTools (computeMatrix, plotHeatmap, plotProfile, bamCoverage, bamCompare), pyGenomeTracks (modern INI-driven track plots), Gviz (R browser-style), EnrichedHeatmap (ComplexHeatmap-based), ChIPseeker tag heatmaps, and IGV batch screenshots. Handles bigWig normalization choices (CPM, BPM, RPGC, spike-in scaled), bamCompare operations (log2 ratio, subtract) with SES scaling, k-means clustering of heatmaps for biological subgrouping, and spike-in-scaled tracks for global-shift experiments. Use when generating publication-quality ChIP-seq signal heatmaps, profile plots, genome-browser tracks, or comparing samples visually.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end binder design using BindCraft hallucination. Use this skill when: (1) Designing protein binders with built-in AF2 validation, (2) Running production-quality binder campaigns, (3) Using different design protocols (fast, default, slow), (4) Need joint backbone and sequence optimization, (5) Want high experimental success rate. For backbone-only generation, use rfdiffusion. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc. For tool selection guidance, use binder-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Treats a ctDNA assay as a molecule-counting experiment at the Poisson edge and builds its analytical-validation case the measurement-science way. Covers the genome-equivalent currency (~330 haploid copies/ng), the lambda = input_GE x VAF sampling ceiling (lambda>=3 for ~95% detection), the error-suppression ladder (raw NGS ~1e-3 -> single-strand UMI ~1e-4/1e-5 -> duplex <1e-7), the CLSI EP17 LoB/LoD/LoD95/LoQ framework, the per-locus-vs-panel-integrated LoD distinction that lets bespoke MRD reach ppm, contrived/SEQC2 reference standards, and honest LoD reporting conditioned on input mass + consensus depth + replicate detection rate. Use when stating or trusting a sensitivity claim, designing a dilution-series validation, deciding how many genome equivalents are needed at a target VAF, choosing a single-locus vs panel-integrated LoD, or auditing a "detects 0.1% VAF" claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EXPERIMENTAL. Join or leave an org-team coordination channel as a session peer. `/companion on <channel_id> [peer_id]` registers this Claude Code session as a `pclass:"session"` peer and works the claim → execute → signal loop, escalating un-decidable forks to the lead (never deciding). `/companion off` deregisters. `/companion status` reports the current peer. Part of org mode (Article X), which is opt-in via `velocity.org_mode.enabled` and OFF by default. Use when a human launches a second session to act as a peer alongside a lead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous experiment loop that optimizes any file by a measurable metric. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch. The agent edits a target file, runs a fixed evaluation, keeps improvements (git commit), discards failures (git reset), and loops indefinitely. Use when: user wants to optimize code speed, reduce bundle/image size, improve test pass rate, optimize prompts, improve content quality (headlines, copy, CTR), or run any measurable improvement loop. Requires: a target file, an evaluation command that outputs a metric, and a git repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose an uncertain bug by designing experiments that distinguish competing causes, especially speculative cache, timing, environment, or concurrency explanations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

W&B: log ML experiments, sweeps, model registry, dashboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Throwaway experiments to validate an idea before build.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prices research, tests, surveys, dashboards and experiments before running them, by computing how much the result would raise expected utility - which is zero whenever no outcome would change the decision. Use when someone proposes an A/B test, user survey, market study, competitor analysis, analytics build, consultant, pilot, or "let's gather more data", and when deciding how large a study needs to be.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates an experiment-overview snapshot of all research questions under research/reports/. Invoke when a new point-in-time report across all RQs should be produced.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。