「fact」の検索結果

Parse Windows LNK shortcut files to extract target paths, timestamps, volume information, and machine identifiers for forensic timeline reconstruction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Windows LNK shortcut files and Jump List artifacts to establish evidence of file access, program execution, and user activity using LECmd, JLECmd, and manual binary parsing of the Shell Link Binary format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Chromium-based browser artifacts using Hindsight to extract browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and browser extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, and Opera for forensic investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform comprehensive forensic analysis of disk images using Autopsy to recover files, examine artifacts, and build investigation timelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when developing code using Test-Driven Development (TDD) methodology. Use this skill when the user wants to write tests first before implementation, needs guidance on the red-green-refactor cycle, or explicitly requests TDD-style development. Triggers include requests like "develop this feature using TDD", "write tests first", "help me with test-driven development", or "implement this following TDD practices". The skill guides through writing failing tests, implementing minimal code to pass, and refactoring while maintaining test coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-reference project artifacts (WBS, meeting minutes, requirements docs) by date, participant, and action items. Extract commitments from meeting minutes and link to WBS tasks. Generate traceability reports showing which decisions were captured in which documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

新しいプロジェクトまたは既存リポジトリに Claude 用の kickoff 文脈を導入するスキル。 テンプレートとリポジトリ証跡、ユーザー入力をもとに `CLAUDE.md`、`docs/PROJECT_BRIEF.md`、 `docs/SKILL_ROUTING.md`、`docs/QUALITY_GATES.md`、`docs/TEST_STRATEGY.md`、 `docs/DECISION_LOG.md`、`docs/HIDDEN_CONTRACT_REGISTER.md`、 `docs/CROSS_MODULE_CONSISTENCY_MATRIX.md`、`.claude/rules/*`、 `.claude/commands/project-kickoff.md` を必要に応じて作成・更新する。 Use when starting a new project, retrofitting AI project context into an existing repository, bootstrapping Claude memory, or standardizing kickoff documents, rules, and slash-command scaffolding. Distinct from project-manager / project-plan-creator (which plan work), and from completion-quality-gate-designer / hidden-contract-investigator / safe-by-default-architect / cross-module-consistency-auditor / production-parity-test-designer (which deeply refine individual artifacts after bootstrap).

Explain a topic like I'm a 5 year old, as a single HTML artifact built from big pictures and very few words. Use this whenever the user asks for a dead-simple explanation of how something works, says "ELI5", "explain like I'm five", "簡単に説明して", "図で説明して", "初心者向けに", "素人にもわかるように", wants to explain a concept to a non-technical manager, customer, or family member, or asks for a visual explainer — even if they don't say "ELI5" explicitly.

Refactor long methods or large code blocks by extracting small, focused helper methods with clear names and narrow responsibilities. Use when asked to extract methods or run `/refactor:methods`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a class or module for code smells and produce a prioritized refactoring plan. Use when the user asks for code smell analysis, says `/smells`, or runs `/refactor:smells`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor code by renaming variables, methods, classes, and concepts for clearer intent. Use when asked to improve names, clarify naming, perform a naming pass, or run `/refactor:names`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze code for primitive obsession and plan value object extractions around domain concepts, validation, and grouped primitive fields. Use when the user says `/value-objects`, asks for value object refactoring, or runs `/refactor:value-objects`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor code to remove dead code, useless comments, unused variables, and unused imports. Use when asked to declutter a class, clean up noisy code, remove cruft, or run `/refactor:declutter`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor duplicated code by extracting helpers, shared abstractions, or clearer reusable structure. Use when asked to apply DRY, remove duplication, consolidate repeated logic, or run `/refactor:dry`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing a new function, adding a feature, fixing a bug, refactoring with test coverage, or writing a new test. Enforces strict outside-in red-green-refactor TDD with one-failure-per-turn discipline, predict-the-failure-before-every-run checks, hardcode-first minimum changes, triangulation, and property-based testing for large input spaces. Triggers on explicit TDD requests and on any task phrased as "implement", "add", "write a function", "build a feature", or "fix a bug" in a test-capable codebase. Reports red/green validation evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two-phase code quality skill: (1) review codebase for structural smells — file LOC, method LOC, accidental complexity, test readability — producing a structured report, then (2) fix all smells via provable refactorings with ACN micro commits and green-bar-at-all-times discipline. Use this skill when the user says 'sweep', 'code review', 'find code smells', 'check method lengths', 'review for complexity', 'tidy up the codebase', 'refactor smells', or asks about long methods, test readability, or accidental complexity. Also trigger when users ask to 'clean up' or 'improve code quality' across multiple files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TDD Production Code Refactoring Process. Triggers on 'tidy up', 'tidy this', 'clean up code'. Use for refactoring production code with test coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor test files to improve behavioral coverage, clarity, structure, assertions, fixture setup, mocking strategy, and remove implementation-detail or low-value tests. Use when asked to clean up, declutter, consolidate, or improve tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compile deep repository evidence into artifact-bound correctness doctrine — authority/law/proof maps, owned invariants, failure archaeology, and the strongest durable destination for each piece of knowledge, plus an optional minimal repository-specific skill portfolio. Use when the user wants both deep codebase understanding AND durable doctrine, knowledge routing, or repo-specific skill recommendations. Research discoverable facts before asking. Read-only. Not for quick onboarding, one isolated invariant, ordinary implementation, generic review, or direct skill creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mine a codebase for breakthrough, evidence-backed opportunities — features, additions, refactors, simplifications, DX, UX, reliability, performance, or architecture cleanup. Researches project reality first, then forces two escalation gates (reject the merely-adequate idea; expand ambition 10x then collapse to the smallest proof-bearing artifact). Outputs ranked opportunities, an escalation ledger, and one plan seed. Does not implement or create tickets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Split or contain large source files according to the source-file boundary ADR without changing behavior opportunistically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repair confirmed architecture drift in small batches while preserving public canon and avoiding broad opportunistic refactors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce variants of an existing Style by shifting tone (light/dark), density (compact/relaxed), or accent (palette rotation) while preserving the brand identity. Use when the user wants alternate themes derived from one brand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide (NASA/SP-2011-3421, 2nd ed.). Use for quantitative PRA of aerospace and safety-critical systems: the risk triplet and scenario logic stack (MLD, ESD, event trees, fault trees, minimal cut sets), Bayesian data collection and parameter estimation, aleatory/epistemic uncertainty modeling and common-cause failure (Alpha Factor, beta-factor, CCBE), human reliability analysis (THERP, CREAM, NARA, SPAR-H), context-based software risk (CSRM), physics-based and structural/phenomenological models (stress-strength, limit states, FORM/SORM, NASGRO, range safety), uncertainty propagation and importance measures (F-V, RAW, Birnbaum, DIM), and launch-abort modeling with worked PRA examples. This is the QUANTITATIVE engine beneath NASA's risk doctrine — for the qualitative RIDM/CRM decision framework use the nasa-risk pack. Thin on programme management, organisational risk governance, and non-aerospace regulatory contexts; aerospace-focused and anchored to the 2011 second edition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。