3,181 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. Use when you have experimental observations or data and need to formulate testable hypotheses with predictions, propose mechanisms, and design experiments to test them. Follows scientific method framework. For open-ended ideation use scientific-brainstorming; for automated LLM-driven hypothesis testing on datasets use hypogenic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the ScholarEval framework to systematically evaluate scholarly work across quality dimensions (novelty, rigor, significance, and clarity). Use to critique academic papers, research proposals, literature reviews, or grant applications and produce a structured, criterion-based assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementing, integrating, upgrading, debugging, or answering anything involving third-party APIs, libraries, frameworks, CLIs, cloud services, model/provider SDKs, fast-moving product behavior, user requests for latest/current/official behavior, unfamiliar repo docs/specs, errors that may indicate API drift, or high-stakes auth, security, billing, data, migration, deployment, compliance, or privacy behavior. Forces Codex to web-search for current official docs and read primary docs before assuming from memory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use in the BuilderIO/skills repo whenever adding, updating, publishing, documenting, validating, or wiring a public skill. Covers the repo-local skill files, root catalog docs, plugin metadata, @agent-native/skills dynamic install path, optional managed AGENTS/CLAUDE instruction blocks in ../agent-native/framework, and generated/synced Plan skill gotchas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. Use when you have experimental observations or data and need to formulate testable hypotheses with predictions, propose mechanisms, and design experiments to test them. Follows scientific method framework. For open-ended ideation use scientific-brainstorming; for automated LLM-driven hypothesis testing on datasets use hypogenic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Single-page SEO audit: content quality under Google's E-E-A-T framework and Helpful Content guidelines, on-page factors, search intent, technical signals and readability. Pulls GSC data for the page, crawls the live HTML, checks metadata, schema, internal linking and depth, and produces a scored report with fixes. Use whenever the user wants to analyze a specific page or URL, not the whole site. Trigger on: "analyze this page", "audit this URL", "how is this page doing", "evaluate my blog post", "check this landing page", "page SEO", "content quality check", "is this page good enough", "review this page's SEO", "what's wrong with this page", "how can I improve this page", "page analysis", "single page audit", "content audit for [URL]", or any request naming a specific URL/page for SEO evaluation. If the user provides a specific URL (not just a domain), this is likely the right skill; use /seo-analysis for full-site audits instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes problems to appropriate mathematical frameworks using expert heuristics
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate concise (3-4 page), focused medical treatment plans in LaTeX/PDF format for all clinical specialties. Supports general medical treatment, rehabilitation therapy, mental health care, chronic disease management, perioperative care, and pain management. Includes SMART goal frameworks, evidence-based interventions with minimal text citations, regulatory compliance (HIPAA), and professional formatting. Prioritizes brevity and clinical actionability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
UX research and design toolkit for Senior UX Designer/Researcher including data-driven persona generation, journey mapping, usability testing frameworks, and research synthesis. Use for user research, persona creation, journey mapping, and design validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep learning framework (PyTorch Lightning). Organize PyTorch code into LightningModules, configure Trainers for multi-GPU/TPU, implement data pipelines, callbacks, logging (W&B, TensorBoard), distributed training (DDP, FSDP, DeepSpeed), for scalable neural network training.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Trigger only when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review/report, or secure-by-default coding help. Trigger only for supported languages (python, javascript/typescript, go). Do not trigger for general code review, debugging, or non-security tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process-based discrete-event simulation framework in Python. Use this skill when building simulations of systems with processes, queues, resources, and time-based events such as manufacturing systems, service operations, network traffic, logistics, or any system where entities interact with shared resources over time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes problems to appropriate mathematical frameworks using expert heuristics
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-objective optimization framework. NSGA-II, NSGA-III, MOEA/D, Pareto fronts, constraint handling, benchmarks (ZDT, DTLZ), for engineering design and optimization problems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when working with LaminDB, an open-source data framework for biology that makes data queryable, traceable, reproducible, and FAIR. Use when managing biological datasets (scRNA-seq, spatial, flow cytometry, etc.), tracking computational workflows, curating and validating data with biological ontologies, building data lakehouses, or ensuring data lineage and reproducibility in biological research. Covers data management, annotation, ontologies (genes, cell types, diseases, tissues), schema validation, integrations with workflow managers (Nextflow, Snakemake) and MLOps platforms (W&B, MLflow), and deployment strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Framework for computational fluid dynamics simulations using Python. Use when running fluid dynamics simulations including Navier-Stokes equations (2D/3D), shallow water equations, stratified flows, or when analyzing turbulence, vortex dynamics, or geophysical flows. Provides pseudospectral methods with FFT, HPC support, and comprehensive output analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user needs current library, framework, or API documentation and version-specific code examples.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement data quality validation with Great Expectations, dbt tests, and data contracts. Use when building data quality pipelines, implementing validation rules, or establishing data contracts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。