「missing」の検索結果

Reviews the instructions text and skills of a declarative agent, with its stated capabilities, knowledge sources and audience, for prompt-injection exposure, data-leakage paths, over-broad permissions and missing refusals, and returns an attack-surface map, a findings table with severity, quoted evidence and attack path, one pasteable fix per finding, a probe pack the owner can run and a refusal-coverage table. Use when the user asks to "red-team this agent", "check these instructions for prompt injection", "could this agent leak data", "review the permissions on my agent" or "what should this agent refuse". Do not use for checking a SKILL.md against the format rules, use skill-file-reviewer instead; do not use for designing the launch test set, use agent-evaluation-plan instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT weighted supplier evaluation matrix from supplier responses and the panel's agreed criteria, weights and scale: a provisional score per cell with the quoted evidence and anchor behind it, a register of every missing or partial answer, and calibration and sensitivity flags. Provisional for panel moderation; never recommends, awards or disqualifies. Use when the user asks to score, weight or rank supplier, bid or tender responses against agreed criteria, for example "score these bids", "build the evaluation matrix", "weight the tender responses" or "rank the suppliers against our criteria". Do not use for a side-by-side comparison without scores, use rfp-comparison-pack instead; for writing the criteria, use rfp-requirements-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads a purchase order extract (spreadsheet, CSV or pasted table) and returns a DRAFT question sheet for the buyer: possible split orders, round amounts, amounts just under an approval threshold, first-seen or near-duplicate vendors, duplicate orders and missing or self approvals, each a neutral question naming the PO numbers, never a finding. Use when the user asks to "review these purchase orders", "screen the PO log", "spot anomalies in this spend extract", "sanity-check the PO register" or "prepare buyer questions before the audit". Do not use for an expense claim or travel request checked against policy, use expense-policy-precheck instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs twice in a PFD to P&ID job. Part 1, before gate G3, validates the discipline proposals for provenance, UNKNOWN handling, conflicts, prohibited content and cross-section consistency and returns results and blocking items. Part 2, before gate G5, assembles the review package, with job header, gate record, every register and proposal, consolidated UNKNOWN list, feedback log and closing statement. Use when the user asks to "validate the enrichment", "run validation before G3", "assemble the review package" or "build the G5 package". Do not use for the readiness map, use pid-tool-readiness-mapping instead; do not use to produce a missing discipline section, use the discipline skill that owns it. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flags where a P&ID draft raises a process safety question and points to the candidate evidence an engineer would review (HAZOP register, relief study, SIL assessment, isolation philosophy), as questions and quoted passages with UNKNOWN for missing documents, plus safety functions, relief devices and isolation requirements carried over as stated. Never rates, sizes, classifies, resolves or declares protection adequate. Use when the user asks to "write the process safety flags", "produce the process safety section of the P&ID enrichment", "list which protection questions this P&ID raises" or "map the HAZOP and relief study evidence to the draft" after gate G2, once the piping and instrumentation sections exist. Do not use for proposing loops, alarms or trips from the control philosophy, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment instead; do not use for checking identifiers, use tagging-and-numbering. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assembles a DRAFT capital expenditure request pack from the requester's inputs: business need, options including do nothing, costs exactly as provided, benefits as stated, risks, assumptions, budget status and the approvals route read from the organisation's own delegation of authority, with UNKNOWN for every missing figure, date or name. Use when the user asks to "prepare a capex request", "draft the business case for this equipment", "fill in the capital request form", "structure this investment proposal" or "what approvals does this spend need". Do not use for a board or committee decision paper, use board-paper-skeleton instead; for an IT change approval, use change-request-pack; to pressure-test a finished business case, use cfo-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks a master document register extract for gaps and returns a DRAFT question list for document control: missing or out-of-sequence revisions, overdue or slipping deliverables, numbering that breaks the project convention, duplicates and incomplete rows, each with row, test and quoted evidence. Never edits the register, re-baselines a date or marks a deliverable complete. Use when the user asks to "check the MDR", "find the gaps in the deliverables list" or "prepare questions on the drawing register". Do not use for drafting a transmittal from a document list, use transmittal-drafter instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns one long support ticket thread (helpdesk history, email chain, chat transcript, call notes) into a one-page DRAFT escalation summary: the customer's ask in their own words, account context as stated, a dated history, what was tried and the stated result of each attempt, the current state, and what is needed from whom by when, every line referenced to a message and every missing fact marked UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "escalate this ticket", "summarise this thread for tier two", "write the hand-over for this case", "what has been tried so far", "brief engineering on this customer issue" or "prepare the escalation note". Do not use for a batch of tickets, use ticket-triage-pack instead; for the review after an outage, use incident-postmortem-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read a media file's real structure with ffprobe through media_run - the JSON invocation and how to read it, what every family of field means, how to count frames, sample without decoding everything, detect HDR and interlacing, and diagnose a missing duration, a stream with no frames or a container that lies. Covers when media_probe's own report is already enough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and repair a kohya-style LoRA dataset before training. Use when the user asks to check, validate, inspect, fix, clean, 体检, or 修 a dataset, captions, or tags. Inspect image count, repeats and step budget, resolution and aspect buckets, duplicates, corrupt or non-RGB images, missing or empty captions, trigger consistency, and tag-frequency hygiene. Return a structural PASS, WARN, or FAIL report and apply only confirmed fix_dataset.py actions, dry-run first with displaced originals quarantined.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Use people-search aggregators and primary public records to find addresses, phone numbers, relatives, age and background on a person, and to audit and remove your own exposure. Use when running a people search or reverse address lookup, tracing a debtor or missing person, building a subject's address history, or removing yourself from broker sites

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Build a sourced, corroborated profile of a named individual from public records, social platforms, professional networks, court and property filings, licensing boards, patents, papers and obituaries — anchoring the name to a… Use when asked to find, identify, background-check or profile a person, verify someone's claimed employment or credentials, or locate a missing or hard-to-reach individual

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide whether to reuse, improve, or scaffold a deterministic helper. Use when repeated work is slow, brittle, or blocked by a missing local tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational guide for the ArtCraft MCP integration — the community Python rebuild (C:\Users\rasta\artcraft-mcp-py\artcraft_mcp_server.py) that replaces the broken upstream artcraft-mcp.exe, the live api.storyteller.ai/v1 API map (required headers, cookie auth, endpoint schemas), the upstream bug/PR trail (issues #1/#3, PR #2), the reverse-engineering playbook (browser capture, cookie injection, schema fishing via validation errors, handshake replay, Windows MITM kit), and the generic MCP-protocol debugging playbook (snake_case servers, the shim pattern, 'missing field protocolVersion' diagnosis). Use when working on ArtCraft MCP tools, debugging an artcraft server connection, extending the Python rebuild, or diagnosing any third-party MCP handshake failure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational guide for the NV oOS Dependabot alert triage-and-remediation loop: querying open alerts via gh api, separating stale from genuinely vulnerable lockfile entries (default-branch forensics), deciding between safe in-major override bumps, scoped overrides, or deferred major migrations (npm pack signature diffing), regenerating the 13-lockfile tree, dismissing alerts with the right reason, GitHub issue housekeeping, and triaging the known CI failure modes. Use when asked to fix dependabot alerts, close out dependabot issues, bump vulnerable npm packages, or resume a dependabot session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safely integrate with WooCommerce Subscriptions renewal, next-payment scheduling, Action Scheduler events, and retry flow. Shows when to use WC_Subscription::update_dates, update_status, wcs_create_renewal_order, wcs_renewal_order_created, woocommerce_scheduled_subscription_payment, woocommerce_scheduled_subscription_payment_{gateway_id}, woocommerce_subscription_renewal_payment_complete, and payment retry hooks. Use when changing next payment dates, forcing/rescheduling renewals, reacting to failed renewals, building gateway recurring charge logic, or debugging missing/duplicate renewal orders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits WordPress plugin/theme code for secret-handling and credential issues — hardcoded API keys, DB credentials, or signing secrets in source; weak randomness (rand, mt_rand, uniqid) used for security tokens, password reset links, nonces, or session IDs; password storage with md5/sha1/crypt instead of password_hash; insecure cookie flags (missing Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite) on sensitive cookies; secrets logged via error_log / var_dump in production code paths. Use before plugin release, when reviewing auth/registration/login features, when integrating third-party APIs, or when the user mentions "API key", "token", "session", "password reset".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits WordPress plugin or theme PHP code for the most common security mistakes — missing nonce checks, capability checks, input sanitization, output escaping, unslashing, SQL preparation, AJAX nopriv exposure, file/path traversal, and unsafe redirects. Use when reviewing pull requests, before releasing a plugin, when the user asks "is this secure", or when handling code that touches $_GET / $_POST / $_REQUEST / $_COOKIE / $_FILES / $_SERVER, admin-ajax / admin-post, REST endpoints, options, user meta, custom DB queries, or file uploads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for quality, simplicity, and maintainability. Identifies unnecessary abstractions, duplicated logic, oversized functions, missing error handling, and naming issues — then fixes them automatically before presenting the result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Given the product offering and existing page inventory, create new core landing and resource pages (homepage refresh, features, solutions, pricing, comparison, resource hubs, about) that capture core product intent using the query-fanout pattern. Use this skill whenever the user asks to "spawn pages", "generate landing pages", "create marketing pages", "build a pricing page", "add a solutions page", "build out the site", "fill in missing pages", or wants new top-level marketing/product pages. Output is one new page per route in the project's native file format (component or markdown), matching the existing page style and framework idiom.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Given the product and the existing page inventory, identify missing blog topics and generate new blog posts that capture search/AI intent using the query-fanout pattern. Use this skill whenever the user asks to "spawn blogs", "generate blog posts", "expand the blog", "build out a content cluster", "write blog ideas", "cover more search intents", "query fanout for blogs", or wants new long-form content that supports existing pillars. Output is one new post per topic in the project's existing post format (markdown, MDX, component, or CMS migration note), with frontmatter shape mirrored from an existing post.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Examine every existing page on the site, build a semantic map across pillars, and add missing internal links so the site becomes a semantic graph anchored on clear topical pillars. Use this skill whenever the user asks to "add internal links", "build internal linking", "build a semantic graph", "link related pages", "strengthen topical authority", "fix orphan pages", "add pillar linking", or wants hub-and-spoke linking between pillars, hubs, and supporting content. Output is an edit list (proposed link insertions) plus optionally direct edits to page source files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes an accounting or audit request to the right module skill, from software selection through monthly closing, asking only what is missing. Use for books of accounts or audit files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "package our proof points", "build reusable stat cards and case snippets", or "put proof where each pillar makes its claim"; turns claims-ledger-approved proofs into reusable proof modules — stat cards, case snippets, testimonial blocks, comparison proofs — each pinned to a message-house pillar and the ledger claim ID it substantiates, and flags any pillar making a claim with no approved proof behind it. Never adjudicates a proof: unverified or ledger-absent proofs are marked '[needs source]' and routed to the claims candidates. Not for adjudicating or substantiating claims — use offer-claims-registry; not for fabricating a benchmark to fill a gap — a missing proof is flagged, not invented; not for scoring narrative quality — use narrative-quality-auditor. 证据模块/证据卡/客户案例/主张对齐

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。