2,480 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Send one of the user's own Minutes meetings to their X1 household for review. Use when the user wants a meeting's summary, decisions, action items, and open questions to reach X1 so they can confirm what belongs in their household record. X1 asks the user to approve the send, and nothing reaches the household record until they confirm each item. Never use it for a restricted meeting, a transcript, or someone else's meeting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fast non-interactive briefing before any meeting — auto-detects your next calendar event, pulls relationship history, surfaces open commitments, and produces a one-page brief in under 30 seconds. Use this whenever the user says "brief me", "give me a quick brief", "what's coming up", "background on my next call", "who am I meeting next", "brief me on Sarah", "I have a call in 10 min", "quick rundown", or right before walking into a meeting. Different from /minutes-prep — brief is the fast hook-fireable version that doesn't ask questions and doesn't set goals. Use brief when speed matters; use prep when the user wants to think hard about goals first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route meeting-recall questions to the right Minutes MCP tool.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search past meeting transcripts and voice memos for specific topics, people, decisions, or ideas. Use this whenever the user asks "what did we discuss about X", "find that meeting where we talked about Y", "what did Alex say", "did we decide on", "what was that idea about", or any question that could be answered by searching their meeting history. Also use for "do I have any notes about" or "check my meetings for".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks about tech debt, refactoring priorities, what to clean up first, or asks "why is this so hard to change?", "what should we fix first?", or "how do I justify refactoring to management?". Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime — "health" in those contexts is infrastructure, not code quality. Also not for single-function refactoring questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin itself. Runs a sequential subagent pipeline — author → eval → QA → trigger-audit → release — to add or edit a skill, refresh the eval suite, keep the four manifests + all README translations + CHANGELOG + AGENTS/GEMINI in sync, audit trigger boundaries, and cut releases. Drives the five agents in .claude/agents/ (skill-author, eval-curator, consistency-qa, trigger-boundary-auditor, release-manager). Triggers when the maintainer asks to work ON brooks-lint itself: "add a new skill", "edit the brooks-debt guide", "update the eval suite", "fix the trigger descriptions", "make this change and validate it", "release brooks-lint", "bump and publish", and follow-ups: "re-run", "re-validate", "update that skill", "redo the audit", "do the X part again". Do NOT trigger for: USING the brooks-lint analysis skills on some target codebase (that's brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test / brooks-health / brooks-sweep); generic questions about brooks-lint that don't ask to change it; or maintenance of a different plugin.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cut a brooks-lint release: set the version in package.json, propagate it across all four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file (README badges, docs site metadata), write the CHANGELOG entry, validate, then commit, push, tag, and publish the GitHub release. Triggers when the maintainer asks to "release", "cut a release", "ship a new version", or "bump and publish" brooks-lint. Do NOT trigger for: propagating an already-decided version without releasing (use `npm run bump` directly), CHANGELOG edits alone, or questions about the release process that don't ask to perform it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to audit architecture, review folder/module structure, check for circular imports, understand how the codebase is organized, or asks "does this follow clean architecture?" or "why does everything depend on everything?". Also triggers for onboarding requests: "explain this codebase to a new developer" or "give me a codebase tour" (use onboarding mode). Do NOT trigger for: PR-level code review (use brooks-review) or line-level refactoring questions — this skill analyzes structural/module-level concerns, not individual functions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow execution, poor readability. Triggers when: user asks about test quality, shares test files for review, or expresses frustration: "tests keep breaking whenever I change anything", "our tests take forever", "tests pass but bugs still reach production", or "we have too many mocks". Do NOT trigger for: writing new tests from scratch (use the regular test-writing workflow) or testing framework/syntax questions — this skill reviews an existing suite for structural quality problems, not individual test authoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a playable prototype in about an hour to answer one question — is it fun? — with greybox primitives, a hard timebox, and explicit keep/kill criteria. Use when prototyping a mechanic, making a vertical slice or MVP, greyboxing/blockout, or judging throwaway vs keep.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Challenge a confirmed task, decision, plan, or artifact through adaptive skeptical questions. Use when you need to expose assumptions before acting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Attribute GPU time in one sglang-omni stage to specific lines of `sglang_omni/` python source. Drives the `llm-torch-profiler-analysis` backend with a mapping/formal trace pair plus steady-state gates, and carries the rules for reading its three tables on an omni stage. Use when a stage is slower than expected and the question is which python code is the bottleneck, not which kernel is hot.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer questions using the Arkon knowledge base. Searches wiki first, drills into raw sources only when needed. Supports quick, standard, and deep modes. Triggers on: what do we know about, find in KB, look up, query:, arkon query, search the wiki, tell me about, based on the KB.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run /architect when choosing between approaches, designing a feature or page, picking a tech stack, or when /develop says a decision is owed, anytime a load bearing technical decision is unmade. Asks deep questions, recommends an answer, and writes a build spec to docs/specs/. Owns all spec files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked Temu 全托管还是半托管, TikTok Shop 怎么入驻, 亚马逊和 Temu 选哪个, 跨境电商平台怎么选, 产品出海要哪些认证, or choose and launch on cross-border marketplaces (Temu, TikTok Shop, Amazon, SHEIN, AliExpress). Produces a platform fit matrix for the seller's product and capacity, the operating model of each shortlisted platform (fully managed, semi-managed or self-operated), the compliance checklist by target market, a 90-day launch plan, and the questions to ask each platform's account manager. For the product listing copy itself, use cross-border-listing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decode a counteroffer after you resign — what the raise, promotion promise, or title bump really signals, the statistics-informed risks of staying, and a clear-eyed decision framework. Use when asked my company countered my resignation, should I accept a counteroffer, they offered me more to stay, or decode this retention offer. Produces a component-by-component decode with 🔴🟡🟢 severity, the questions that expose which promises are real, and the stay/go decision sheet.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked 幼升小怎么准备, 小升初流程, 入学信息采集, 学区房和多校划片, 公民同招, 民办摇号, 随迁子女入学, 居住证入学材料, or plan a child's entry to primary or junior high school in mainland China. Produces a month-by-month timeline for the child's city, the documents to prepare (户籍, 房产 or 租房, 居住证, 社保), the questions to ask the 教育局 or school about 学区, 多校划片 and 派位, a public versus private comparison, and a checklist, with every local rule marked to confirm with the local education bureau.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked 帮我写家长会发言稿, 家长会PPT大纲, 班主任家长会讲话, 期中家长会, 新生家长会, 毕业班家长会, or prepare a parent meeting as a Chinese teacher. Produces a parent-meeting pack in Chinese: an agenda, a timed speech for the 班主任 or subject teacher with class data presented without ranking individual students, a slide outline, specific requests to parents, a one-page handout, answers to likely questions, and a follow-up message for the parents' WeChat group.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Estimate economic compensation (经济补偿金) when employment ends in mainland China: N, N+1 or 2N under the Labour Contract Law, with the high-earner cap, the part-year rule and the questions that decide which case applies. Use when asked 我被裁员了能拿多少补偿, N+1 怎么算, 经济补偿金计算, 违法解除 2N, or how much severance am I owed in China. Produces the scenario that likely applies and why, the calculation shown step by step, what to check before signing anything, and where to get it confirmed. Not legal advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked 年终奖怎么算, 13薪和年终奖有什么区别, 年终奖怎么交税, 单独计税还是并入综合所得, 年终奖被扣了怎么办, 离职了年终奖还发吗, 怎么问 HR 年终奖, or understand a year-end bonus in mainland China. Produces how the person's bonus is likely calculated from their documents, the 13薪 versus discretionary bonus distinction, the tax options with a worked comparison marked to confirm, questions to ask HR or the manager in writing, and the steps if a bonus is withheld after resignation, all marked to confirm against current rules. Not tax or legal advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked 个人信息保护影响评估怎么做, 写一份 PIA, 处理敏感个人信息要评估吗, 自动化决策评估, PIPL 第五十五条, or assess a processing activity under China's Personal Information Protection Law. Produces a personal information protection impact assessment (个人信息保护影响评估) covering the PIPL Article 55 triggers, the Article 56 questions (lawful, legitimate and necessary; impact and risk; adequacy of protection), a risk register with mitigations and owners, and a record kept for at least three years.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked 帮我写开题报告, 开题答辩怎么准备, 文献综述怎么写, 技术路线图, 研究内容和创新点, or write a thesis proposal for a Chinese university. Produces a 开题报告 in the section order Chinese universities use (选题背景与意义, 国内外研究现状, 研究内容与目标, 研究方法与技术路线, 创新点, 研究基础, 进度安排, 预期成果, 参考文献), a literature review plan, a technical route diagram in text, and the questions the 开题答辩 panel is likely to ask.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a candidate's research brief on a company before an application or interview. Use when asked to research a company for a job, prep a company brief before an interview, or understand a prospective employer fast. Produces a one-page brief — what they do & how they make money, recent news & trajectory, product & competitors, likely challenges, culture signals, and smart questions to ask.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked 个体户怎么报税, 小规模纳税人增值税怎么算, 小微企业所得税优惠, 经营所得汇算, 开票超过免税额怎么办, or plan taxes for a sole trader (个体工商户) or small company in China. Produces the taxes that apply (增值税, 附加税费, 个人所得税经营所得 or 企业所得税), the relief that may apply with the announcement to check, a worked estimate from the person's own figures, a filing calendar, and the questions for the local tax office or 12366.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。