「refactor」の検索結果

Node.js & TypeScript development intelligence. 12 domains, 12 stacks, 300+ entries. Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, check Node code. Domains: pattern, package, error, perf, test, async, arch, idiom, anti, tooling, module, typescript. Stacks: web-express, web-fastify, web-hono, web-nestjs, web-nextjs, web-remix, orm-prisma, orm-drizzle, auth, database, realtime, graphql. Integrations: arch_system generator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rust development intelligence. 14 domains, 11 stacks, 300+ entries. Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, check Rust code. Domains: pattern, crate, error, perf, test, concurrency, traits, arch, idiom, anti, tooling, module, unsafe. Stacks: web-axum, web-actix, web-rocket, web-warp, cli, grpc, database, async-runtime, auth, wasm, embedded. Integrations: arch_system generator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mobile development intelligence. 12 domains, 9 stacks, 250+ entries. Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, check mobile code. Domains: pattern, package, error, perf, test, security, interface, arch, idiom, anti, tooling, dependency. Stacks: flutter, react-native, swiftui, jetpack-compose, kotlin-multiplatform, capacitor, expo, native-ios, native-android. Integrations: arch_system generator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix. Routes to the core Red-Green-Refactor loop, test quality guidance, rationalization handling, examples, or stuck-state recovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and manage Architecture Decision Records (ADRs). Use when making architectural changes (refactoring, API versioning, new domain layers, schema changes), when reviewing recent commits for documentation needs, or when the user mentions ADR, architecture decisions, or documenting technical decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Odoo 17 development reference for Python models and ORM (search, domain, read_group, compute fields), XML/CSV data and views, OWL/JS client code, QWeb reports, security (ACL, record rules, groups), cron and server actions, migrations and module upgrades, tests, i18n, and performance. Use this skill whenever work involves Odoo 17 or custom addons, including traceback diagnosis, addons, manifests, XML errors, HTTP controllers, business rules, feature work, refactoring, or reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Odoo engineering workflows for addon development, codebase exploration, debugging, architecture/refactor review, manifest/docs sync, and routing to migration work. Use when the user mentions Odoo, addons, modules, manifests, models, XML views, security CSVs, record rules, Odoo shell, OWL/QWeb/assets, or when an Odoo codebase is detected.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Odoo 18 development reference for Python models and ORM (search, domain, read_group, compute fields), XML/CSV data and views, OWL/JS client code, QWeb reports, security (ACL, record rules, groups), cron and server actions, migrations and module upgrades, tests, i18n, and performance. Use this skill whenever work involves Odoo 18 or custom addons, including traceback diagnosis, addons, manifests, XML errors, HTTP controllers, business rules, feature work, refactoring, or reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author, validate, test, and troubleshoot Copilot Studio agents through YAML-driven commands instead of clicking through the product UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lint Nix expressions and automatically rewrite common anti-patterns before review or refactor work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use jscodeshift when an agent needs AST-based JavaScript or TypeScript codemods for bulk migrations, API rewrites, and large refactors with reviewable diffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Give a coding agent symbol-aware lookup, cross-file rename, and structural edit tools before it starts making brittle text-only changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a rigorous Carmack Council code review. Use when explicitly asked to review code, do a "council review", "carmack review", or invoke /council-review. Carmack's philosophy chairs a council of domain experts — Troy Hunt (security), Martin Fowler (refactoring), Kent C. Dodds (frontend), Matteo Collina (Node.js), Brandur Leach (Postgres), Vercel Performance, Simon Willison (LLM pipelines), Karri Saarinen (UI quality), Vitaly Friedman (UX quality), Kent Beck (test quality). Uses parallel subagents for deep, independent review. Produces prioritised P1/P2/P3 findings. Stack: Next.js App Router / React / TypeScript / tRPC / Prisma / Neon / Clerk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architect a feature with the Carmack Council before writing code. Use when explicitly asked to plan a feature, do a "council plan", "carmack plan", or invoke /council-plan. Carmack's philosophy chairs a council of domain experts — Troy Hunt (security), Martin Fowler (refactoring), Kent C. Dodds (frontend), Matteo Collina (Node.js), Brandur Leach (Postgres), Vercel Performance, Simon Willison (LLM pipeline), Karri Saarinen (UI quality), Vitaly Friedman (UX quality). Interactive feature discovery followed by parallel subagent dispatch. Produces a sequenced, attributed implementation plan with no code. Stack: Next.js App Router / React / TypeScript / tRPC / Prisma / Neon / Clerk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CTO-level architectural advisor for AI-native development. Use this skill whenever you encounter code design decisions, architecture discussions, system resilience questions, or any work touching: "architecture", "design", "scale", "dependencies", "state", "failure", "blast radius", "refactor", "migrate", "optimize", "resilience", "consistency", "observability", "bottleneck", "coupling", "monolith", "microservices", "distributed", "concurrency", "data flow", "system design", or any prompt suggesting code-first thinking when design-first thinking is needed. This skill integrates with Claude Code to review generated code for architectural soundness, define design systems via design.md, and guide teams toward CTO-level thinking. Trigger aggressively on architectural questions—this is where AI adds the most leverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrites code to its simplest possible form while preserving exact external behavior (KISS, YAGNI).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-validate code, architecture or design decisions using a second model. Use for critical decisions, complex refactoring, security reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when navigating or refactoring code with a language server - choosing between semantic (LSP), exact-text (rg), and fuzzy/semantic search; anchoring LSP calls by position; gating degraded results; and disclosing tool substitutions, in any language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for code/PR/diff review and refactor audits. Triggers: review this, before merge, antipattern, 리뷰, 코드 리뷰, 머지 전에 확인.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for coding, PR delivery, scaffolding and QA. Triggers: develop, fix, refactor, test, review, docs, browse, stacked PR, 개발, 수정, 검토, 스택 PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute TDD task pairs autonomously with RED-GREEN-REFACTOR verification. Orchestrates wave-based execution with strategic parallelism, routing TDD tasks to tdd-executor agents and non-TDD tasks to standard task-executor. Use when user says "execute tdd tasks", "run tdd tasks", "start tdd execution", or wants to execute TDD-paired tasks from create-tdd-tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a full RED-GREEN-REFACTOR TDD workflow for a feature. Accepts a feature description, task ID, or spec section as input. Presents a plan for confirmation then runs autonomously through all TDD phases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。