「rev」の検索結果

When the user wants to turn content into revenue, build a content-led GTM motion, reverse engineer distribution, or repurpose content across platforms. Also use when the user mentions 'content marketing,' 'content-led growth,' 'content to pipeline,' 'distribution,' 'content repurposing,' 'content strategy,' 'thought leadership,' 'newsletter,' 'content flywheel,' 'organic growth.' This skill covers content-to-revenue systems from creation through pipeline attribution. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze PR review comments from a GitHub PR URL. Fetch review comments, verify each finding against the actual codebase, assess validity (correct/incorrect/partial), present a structured summary with recommended actions, and optionally reply to each comment on GitHub. Use when given a PR review URL or when asked to check/analyze PR feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make any UI appear as if an AI agent is generating it. A dotted wireframe is drawn from the element's own structure (outline, boxes, text lines, icon paths, with guides, corner handles and size labels), then the real UI is revealed behind a scan line with a fade on a smooth ease-out. Two modes, skeleton and skeleton + generation texts (an agent log, the motion CSS being written, and a step line). One dependency-free runtime that works with any framework (vanilla, React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte). Use when the user asks for a "generation animation", "AI generating the UI", "agent building the component", "build-in animation", "wireframe to UI reveal", "skeleton generation", "dotted wireframe", "matrix dots", "make it look generated", "futuristic reveal", "generative UI loading", or for an AI product that should show its output being built. Also the commands transitions generate, transitions generate texts and transitions generate preview.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

开发完成后的三方对抗式代码评审闭环：蓝军（敌意审查，须给证据链）→ 第三方（独立审计，不信双方文档、只读代码，专找"修改引入的新缺陷"并稽核蓝军漏审的维度）→ 中立裁定（逐条采纳/驳回、审查双方共同前提）。当用户说"蓝军评审""第三方复核""对抗性审查""红蓝互搏""三方评审""交叉验证""发布前审查""帮我挑刺""adversarial review""red team review""pre-release review""critique this""find bugs in my code"或要求提升代码质量、准备发布前把关时使用。也适用于用户想把当前会话变成"多个 Agent 互搏"来提升代码水平的场景。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chinese-first research paper writing, revision, polishing, section drafting, rebuttal, peer-review response, thesis prose improvement, and manuscript argument planning. Use when the user asks to write or revise论文正文, abstracts, introductions, methods, results, discussion, conclusions, related work, responses to reviewers, LaTeX/Overleaf text, or academic prose. Preserve formulas, English paper titles, terms, citations, and measured results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive system flow tracing across CODE, API, AUTH, DATA, NETWORK layers with SQLite persistence and Mermaid export. Use for security audits, compliance documentation, flow tracing, feature ideation, brainstorming, debugging, architecture reviews, or incident post-mortems. Triggers on audit, trace flow, document flow, security review, debug flow, brainstorm, architecture review, post-mortem, incident review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured literature review using a parallel fleet of Librarian agents. Searches top journals, working paper repositories (NBER, SSRN, IZA), and traces citation chains from key papers. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants to survey existing research on a topic — not to find datasets or write a paper. Triggers include: "review the literature", "find related papers", "what's been done on X", "search for papers on", "do a lit review", "find papers about", "what papers should I cite", "who has written about this", "survey the literature", "find prior work on", or any request to locate and summarize academic publications on a topic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill covers academic journal submission, referee responses, and revision management. Use when the user is preparing a manuscript for submission, formatting for a specific journal, responding to referees, or managing revisions. Triggers on "submit", "referee", "revision", "R&R", "response letter", "journal", "formatting", "submission", "resubmit", "cover letter", "referee report", "revise and resubmit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate master's thesis review reports (硕士论文评阅意见) calibrated to a given score. Outputs academic evaluation and shortcomings/suggestions in Chinese. Trigger when user says "master thesis review" / "硕士论文评阅" / "论文评阅" / "评阅意见" / "thesis review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use this skill when writing, drafting, editing, reviewing, or revising any text to eliminate predictable AI tells, slop, and formulaic patterns. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks to "deslop", "de-AI", "make it sound human," "remove AI patterns," "remove AI tropes," "clean up AI writing," fix "slop," "deslop" text, or review prose for authenticity. Also use when the user asks you to write or draft anything and wants it to sound natural rather than AI-generated. Common use cases include scientific writing (manuscripts, abstracts, cover letters, grant narratives, discussion sections, peer review responses), blog posts, newsletters, memos, reports, and any other substantial prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Queue microsoft/apm pull requests labelled `panel-review` (or an explicit named list) and fan them out through an isolated pool (default 2) of autopilot-pr-review-worker sessions. Advisory only. Never implements. Never composes autopilot-pr-merge-worker. Never review every open PR. Works in a local session, Copilot App automation, Cloud Agent, Remote Agent, or Agentic Workflow. Does not triage issues or open greenfield PRs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-model second opinion from Google Gemini — a different AI reviewing the same changes, with deep Google ecosystem knowledge. Three modes: review (pass/fail gate for Google Ads campaigns, SEO metadata, or code), challenge (adversarial stress-test that tries to break your changes), and consult (open Q&A with Gemini on Google Ads strategy, SEO best practices, or implementation questions). Use when the user says "gemini review", "ask gemini", "gemini challenge", "second opinion from gemini", "consult gemini", "stress test with gemini", "what would gemini say", "cross-model review", or "get another opinion". Voice aliases: "gem", "gemini check". Especially useful for Google Ads changes, SEO metadata updates, campaign structure decisions, keyword strategies, and bid/budget changes — Gemini has native Google ecosystem knowledge that complements Claude's analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract and analyze writing improvements from GitHub PR review comments. Use when asked to show review feedback, style changes, or editorial improvements from a GitHub pull request URL. Handles both explicit suggestions and plain text feedback. Produces structured output comparing original phrasing with reviewer suggestions to help refine future writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deterministic debugging with rr record-replay. Use when debugging crashes, ASAN faults, or when reverse execution is needed. Provides reverse-next, reverse-step, reverse-continue commands and crash trace extraction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review how the lean-ctx ctx_* MCP tools performed in the current session and file upstream issues for confirmed problems. Use when the user asks to review/audit lean-ctx tool performance, says "lean-ctx review", asks why ctx_* tools failed or fell back to native tools, or wants to report a lean-ctx bug.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a PipesHub pull request or diff for correctness, scalability, null safety, reuse, design and tests. Use when asked to review a PR, a branch, a commit or the current diff, and when CI runs the automated review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Domain routing and boundary guidance for authorized reverse engineering analysis, including decompilation, debugging, protocol reversing, firmware extraction, and deobfuscation. Use when a task belongs to the reverse engineering domain and needs scope, evidence, pivot, or exit criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review-feedback handling route for CodeRabbit, GitHub, PR, or human reviewer comments. Use before implementing suggestions to verify each finding. Do not use for a fresh code review, security audit, TDD, or final completion evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Default code-quality route for broad code review, PR review, maintainability, correctness, and regression-risk checks. Do not use as the primary route for dedicated OWASP/security audits, review-feedback handling, completion verification, AI-code cleanup, or TDD/test-first work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-fix issues found by code review in REVIEW.md. Spawns fixer agent, commits each fix atomically, produces REVIEW-FIX.md summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze sell-side analyst estimates and how they are changing, using Yahoo Finance data (yfinance): EPS and revenue consensus by period, estimate ranges and dispersion, revision trends over 7/30/60/90 days and up/down revision breadth, growth estimates vs industry, sector, and the S&P 500, and historical estimate accuracy. Use this skill when the user wants more than a single estimate lookup: estimate revisions or momentum, EPS trend, consensus changes, forward or next-quarter and annual estimates, the bull vs bear estimate spread, or growth projections across periods.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。