1.2万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Detects improper use of SKStoreReviewController.requestReview() that violates Guideline 5.6.1 — including prompts triggered by button taps, excessive frequency, or satisfaction gating.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects review-blocking configuration issues including sub-1.0 version numbers, beta in app name, staging endpoints, and missing demo credentials that prevent reviewers from evaluating the app, violating Guidelines 2.1 and 2.3.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan or review software architecture through a small expert panel. Use when the user explicitly asks for architecture planning, system design, technical strategy, an architecture assessment, a design review, or a system health review. Do not use for ordinary PR review, debugging, or implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic literature review methodology for social science research. Use when conducting systematic reviews, research synthesis, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, or comprehensive literature searches across economics, political science, sociology, education, public health, and development. Produces structured notebook cells with search strategy, evidence table, thematic synthesis, and gap analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review all unreviewed documents in Hubdoc. Use when reviewing, processing or publishing Hubdoc receipts and bills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs human-in-the-loop review points for DAG workflows. Determines what to present to the human, how to collect feedback, and how to route approve/reject/modify decisions back into the DAG. Use when adding approval gates, designing review UX, or handling human feedback in agent workflows. Activate on "human review", "approval gate", "human-in-the-loop", "human gate", "approval workflow", "user review step". NOT for executing human gates at runtime (use dag-runtime with Temporal signals), general UX design, or chatbot conversation design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes ticket complexity and maps dependencies against an existing codebase before sprint planning. Triggers on 'how complex is this ticket', 'what should we work on first', 'can we fit this in the sprint', 'tech review before planning', 'plan the sprint'. NOT for writing implementation plans (see mk:plan-creator); NOT for scope/ambition review (see mk:plan-ceo-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured second-pass reasoning after code review or plan evaluation. Offers named reasoning methods (pre-mortem, inversion, red team, Socratic, etc.) to re-examine findings through a specific lens. Use after /mk:review verdict or any time deeper analysis is needed on an existing output. NOT for initial review (see mk:review); NOT for creating implementation plans (see mk:plan-creator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforces KISS/DRY/YAGNI during authoring and ad-hoc quality reviews. Pragmatic standards: concise, direct, no unnecessary comments. NOT for post-hoc diff/PR review (see mk:review); NOT for behavior-preserving simplification passes (see mk:simplify).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-of-week reflection report. Mines your Claude Code transcripts from the last 7 days to produce a self-contained HTML file with (1) the topics/areas you explored, (2) distilled key learnings with live-searched further-reading links, and (3) a token/command/skill/ctx-stack usage summary. Use when the user says "week in review", "weekly review", "what did I learn this week", "my week", or runs /week-in-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search and preview Irasutoya illustrations with the installed `irasutoya` command-line tool. Use this skill whenever the user wants to find, recommend, preview, randomly pull up, or get the page/image URL of an Irasutoya (いらすとや) image — from a topic, scene, Korean/Japanese/English phrase, visual description, emotion, character, object, or action — even if they don't say "Irasutoya" by name but clearly want a free, cute illustration for a slide, 발표자료, blog, doc, or chat. Also use it to optimize vague requests into fast Japanese keyword candidates and to return page/image URLs. Do NOT use it to generate brand-new AI art (e.g. DALL·E, Midjourney), draw charts or diagrams, design logos or icons, cut out/edit existing images, or recommend other stock-image sites — it only searches Irasutoya's existing catalog.
Review application and infrastructure changes for exploitable security risks by tracing assets, trust boundaries, attacker-controlled input, authorization, sensitive data, and dangerous sinks. Use for security reviews, threat-focused PR reviews, authentication or authorization changes, input handling, secrets, dependencies, and infrastructure permissions; do not use to exploit live systems or modify code unless separately requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post findings from the most recent review output as inline GitHub PR comments and record them in today's daily note. Use when invoked as `$pr-post-review-findings` or when the user asks to post review findings to the current PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Workflow] Use when activating the Review Current Changes workflow for review, fix, and re-review recursively until all issues resolved.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when you need to combine /why-review + /fix in a recursive loop — each round runs /why-review to find validated findings then /fix to resolve them, then loops again over the CHANGED target until a fresh full /why-review produces zero findings (nothing left to fix).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when you need to combine /changes-review + /fix in a recursive loop — each round runs /changes-review (report-only) to surface validated findings over a fixed diff scope, then /fix to resolve them, then loops again with a FRESH full /changes-review over the CHANGED diff until one complete pass produces zero validated findings (nothing left to fix).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Architecture] Use when auditing the ENTIRE project architecture and production readiness in one pass — bundles architecture-review + architecture-scalability-review + production-readiness-review at project or diff scope, then synthesizes one consolidated Architecture Health Report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing a pull request in the deepseek-harness repo — orients the reviewer to this codebase's standards (AGENTS.md conventions, defensive patterns, ADRs, quality gates) and the review-specific checks that code alone can't show
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Goal-directed review of git history for change coherence. Trigger when: - Analyzing project history, reviewing diffs, or checking commit messages for alignment. - Prompt contains: /git-review, git history, commit log, change coherence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code Review Assistant. Reviews uncommitted changes or recent commits for pattern violations, security issues, and bugs. Optimized for solo dev moving fast. Use when reviewing code before or after committing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Propose the test(s) FIRST and get a human to sign off on the behaviour before writing the code — the test analog of /schema-review and /ui-proposal. For hand-written LOGIC in packages/* (apps opt-in, pocs exempt). Renders the proposed failing test as a reviewable contract, holds for lgtm/approve, then you write the code to make it green. Use when an agent is about to implement packages/* logic, or when asked to "write the test first", "TDD this", "agree on the test", run /test-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a PR end-to-end with CI checks, fix cycles, and optional auto-merge. Use for PR review, cleanup, or readiness checks. Don't use for creating PRs, raw issue analysis, or non-PR code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Integration review after stable code. Audit tier for high-risk surfaces; planning tier for optional low-risk review. Produces a review note and fix list — no implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when you need to review presentation materials from an audience perspective to improve their quality and effectiveness. Evaluates content clarity, visual design, logical flow, engagement factors, and Marp technical compatibility. Triggers include "review my presentation", "check my slides", "presentation feedback", or when a user has completed a draft presentation and wants comprehensive quality review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。