2,301 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Review code for security problems; scan for vulnerabilities, secrets, dependency and prompt risks. Use when: asked whether code is safe to ship, even one small handler.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end Codex-native Amazon FBA research workflow using LaunchFast MCP. Use when the user wants a single report covering product research, IP risk, supplier sourcing, and PPC keyword intelligence. Requires `research_products`, `ip_check_manage`, `supplier_research`, and `amazon_keyword_research`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding whether a mod belongs in a modpack — judging mod quality, fit, risk, and pack-value BEFORE download/install. Triggers - "should I add this mod", "is this mod good", "评估这个mod", "这个mod值得装吗", "is this mod worth it", "this mod looks too good to be true", "compare these mods", "does this mod fit my pack". NOT for how to install a mod (use interpreting-mod-author-instructions), load order (writing-bgs-load-order), or conflict resolution (xedit-conflict-audit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reading, editing, or generating a Bethesda Game Studio load-order file (plugins.txt / loadorder.txt) for Fallout 4, Skyrim SE/AE/VR, Fallout 76, Starfield, or when launching xEdit with a custom plugin list. Authoritative reference for the asterisk-prefix format, official masters detection, ESL handling, and the routing rules between plugins.txt editing and xEdit daemon commands.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding WHERE to point SEO effort, not how to write a page. Triggers: a new site or brand with no rankings and no authority ("cold start", "starting from zero", "nobody knows us"), deciding what to double down on, a page or cluster that ranks but earns nothing, hunting emerging or newly-coined keywords before competitors arrive, "should we build a cluster or one page", "what do we write next", "we get impressions but no clicks", "our traffic plateaued despite publishing", whether to chase a head term at all, or turning any of it into recurring automation. Also use when asked why an SEO effort stalled despite consistent output. NOT for writing an article, keyword expansion mechanics, or auditing a single tactic for penalty risk.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review generated or changed production code before it ships, using Clean Code, SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI, and LLM-specific failure-mode checks in any programming language. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, refactors, or fixes code, before presenting, committing, or merging the result. Use when the user asks "review this PR", "is this safe to merge?", "make this cleaner", "audit this code", "refactor this", "fix this bug", or after a coding agent produced implementation code. Can also guide writing when explicitly invoked before a risky edit. Invoke it on your own initiative the moment you finish writing, editing, or refactoring non-trivial production code, before presenting or committing — don't wait to be asked. DO NOT USE for factual/conceptual questions, CI/tooling config, git workflow, running/debugging tests, pure architecture discussion, prose writing, data analysis, or test-code review (use test-guard).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates an x-ray.md pre-audit report covering overview, enhanced threat model (protocol-type profiling, git-weighted attack surfaces, temporal risk analysis, composability dependency mapping), invariants, integrations, docs quality, test analysis, and developer/git history. Triggers on 'x-ray', 'audit readiness', 'readiness report', 'pre-audit report', 'prep this protocol', 'protocol prep', 'summarize this protocol'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building or trimming the exhibits of an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) short-format manuscript to the hard five-exhibit budget, one page each, no significance asterisks. Designs the minimum exhibit set; it does not run the analysis behind them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building or revising exhibits for an AEJ: Economic Policy manuscript so they meet AEA house style and carry the policy message — no significance asterisks, a self-contained headline exhibit, and figures that show the policy effect with uncertainty. Designs exhibits; it does not run the estimation or write the surrounding prose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when explaining or planning around AAAI's two-phase review process, Phase 1 rejection risk, Phase 2 additional reviews, AI-assisted review pilot, author feedback, SPC/AC discussion, and final decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a decision-ready brief of current brand, product, category, and competitor conversations across social platforms, including sentiment drivers, questions, risks, and growth opportunities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bead-based signal normalization and cross-batch harmonization for CyTOF and high-parameter cytometry - EQ four-element bead normalization of instrument sensitivity drift (CATALYST normCytof, premessa), and reference-anchor cross-batch normalization (CytoNorm, per-cluster quantile splines). Covers the distinction between within-run drift correction and between-batch correction, the mandatory anchor/reference sample, why normalization is per-cluster with many quantiles, and the over-correction risk. Use when correcting CyTOF signal drift, harmonizing multi-batch or multi-site studies, or deciding whether to normalize data versus model batch in the design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add p-value brackets, significance asterisks, and effect-size annotations to distribution plots using ggpubr, ggsignif, and statannotations with correct test selection (parametric vs non-parametric vs paired), multiple-testing adjustment, and rendering of negative results. Use when a boxplot/violin/raincloud needs in-figure statistical comparisons between groups.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs time-to-event analysis for clinical trials including Cox proportional hazards regression with PH diagnostics, restricted mean survival time (RMST) under non-PH, competing risks via Fine-Gray vs cause-specific Cox, weighted log-rank and MaxCombo for non-proportional hazards, recurrent events (Andersen-Gill, PWP, WLW), and interval-censored data. Use when analyzing time-to-event endpoints (OS, PFS, DOR, TTR, TTNT) in oncology or other clinical trials.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs cis-pQTL Mendelian randomization for drug-target validation using UKB-PPP (Olink), deCODE (SomaScan), Fenland, INTERVAL, ARIC, and FinnGen-PPP proteomes plus colocalization triangulation, phenome-wide on-target adverse-effect scans, cross-platform Olink/SomaScan replication, and PAV (protein-altering variant) sensitivity. Use when nominating or de-risking a drug target from plasma-proteome GWAS, mimicking pharmacological inhibition via cis-pQTL instruments, separating shared-causal from LD-confounded signal under the Schmidt 2020 cis-MR framework, screening on-target adverse phenotypes pheWAS-style, or producing publication-grade STROBE-MR plus PP.H4 evidence for a target gene.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Three modes for CS-conference papers (CVPR/ICCV/ECCV vision, ACL/EMNLP/NAACL NLP, ICLR/NeurIPS/ICML/AAAI ML). DIRECT-EDIT mode (common): the user describes a change in Chinese or English and the manuscript (LaTeX or Markdown) is edited directly through a CS-venue writing toolkit with author sign-off (use for 改这段 / 把中文想法写成 latex / polish / de-AI / translate / compress a passage). REVIEW mode (occasional, pre-submission): harden the paper through an adversarial courtroom review engine (N holistic domain reviewers / contestability routing / two-sided trial / three-way verdict / clerk-converged multi-round loop) with consensus-gated, author-signed revisions (use for review / critique / 审稿 / 评审 / mock-review). AUTO mode (unattended, opt-in via /goal): run the review-revise loop toward a verifiable goal, applying safe fixes under a drift-bounded policy and queueing risky ones. Resolves all inputs at runtime, no hardcoded paths. Not a from-scratch drafter (use ml-paper-writing) and not an official-venue rebuttal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits App Store submission readiness and rejection risk across current review guidelines, PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy and required-reason APIs, privacy labels, ATT, StoreKit payments, metadata, entitlements, widgets, and Live Activities. Use when preparing a submission, responding to rejection, reconciling privacy evidence, or separating upload blockers from cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct threat modeling using STRIDE methodology. Identify threats, assess risks, and design security controls. Use when designing secure systems or assessing application security.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run structured AI red team exercises for jailbreak resistance, data exfiltration risk, harmful output controls, and agent tool abuse resilience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement ISO 27001 Information Security Management System. Configure ISMS controls and risk management. Use when implementing enterprise security frameworks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement vendor risk management programs. Assess third-party security and maintain vendor inventory. Use when managing supplier security.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Product research for dropshipping businesses. Identify profitable products with reliable suppliers, healthy margins, and manageable competition. Evaluates shipping times, return risk, and marketing viability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
5 expert personas debate proposed changes before implementation. Catches architectural, security, performance, and UX issues early. Use before major features or risky changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a full audit of the user's Claude Code configuration via the Agent Monitor Config Explorer API: counts per surface (user vs project), duplicate or overlapping skills and subagents, hooks that run shell commands, and which surfaces are read-only vs mutable. Reads /api/cc-config/overview, /skills, /agents, /commands, /hooks, and /settings. Use when reviewing your Claude Code setup for sprawl, duplication, or risk.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。