「the」の検索結果

Prepares a discovery call brief from what the user has on a prospect (CRM record, inbound form, emails, notes, public material the user supplies): what is known with sources, gaps against the qualification dimensions, hypotheses to test, questions in priority order and what to listen for. Returns a DRAFT Markdown brief in the chat. Use when the user asks to "prep me for the discovery call with <prospect>", "what should I ask on this first call", "intro call brief", "questions for the qualification call" or "what do we know before we speak to them". Do not use for scoring leads against a rubric, use lead-qualification-scorer instead; for an existing customer's account review use account-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a nonconformance report from inspection notes, test results and the governing specification or procedure: what was observed, where, the evidence with references, the requirement cited quoted verbatim with the departure from it, and containment proposals for the quality lead to decide. Never classifies severity, dispositions the item, names a root cause or closes the report. Use when the user asks to "write up this nonconformance", "draft an NCR from my inspection notes", "formalise this deviation" or "turn this snag into a defect report". Do not use for tracking the actions an NCR raises, use corrective-action-tracker instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts one anonymised DRAFT case study (situation, approach, outcome as evidenced, optional lessons) from engagement notes, status reports, closing reports, emails and metrics extracts the user supplies, with a fact trace to the notes, an evidence grade on every result, quotes only where the user supplied them with speaker role and permission, an anonymisation log and a confidentiality checklist that must be completed before publication. Use when the user asks to "write a case study from these notes", "turn this engagement into a customer story", "draft a success story for the website", "anonymise this project write-up" or "prepare a reference case for the proposal". Do not use for redacting identifiers from an existing document, use document-deidentification-pass instead; for checking whether a document's claims are substantiated, use claims-evidence-map. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sweeps a SharePoint library listing (an export or a listing the agent can reach, with file name, link, review-date column and owner column) for documents past their review date and returns a dated DRAFT review sweep report (Overdue, Due soon, No review date, Summary) plus one ready-to-paste reminder per document owner for the user to send. Never changes metadata, sends a message or invents a document, date or owner. Use when the user asks to "find the documents past their review date", "run the review sweep on the policies library", "which documents are overdue for review", "audit the review dates in this library export" or "draft reminders to owners about stale documents". Do not use for duplicate, conflict and ownership checks across knowledge files, use knowledge-base-hygiene-review instead; for gaps in an engineering deliverables register, use master-document-register-check. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT data dictionary from a schema export, table definition, sample rows or a partial existing dictionary: one row per field with the name as stated, type as stated or observed, meaning quoted from the documentation supplied, owner, allowed values, and UNKNOWN wherever no source defines the field, plus a gap list for the data owner. Never infers a definition from a column name. Use when the user asks to "build a data dictionary for this table", "document these columns", "what does each field mean", "turn this schema export into a dictionary" or "fill in the field definitions from these documents". Do not use for profiling values or finding patterns in the data, use dataset-insight-pack instead; for metric definitions, use kpi-definition-sheet; for logging data defects, use data-quality-issue-log. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flags where a P&ID draft raises a process safety question and points to the candidate evidence an engineer would review (HAZOP register, relief study, SIL assessment, isolation philosophy), as questions and quoted passages with UNKNOWN for missing documents, plus safety functions, relief devices and isolation requirements carried over as stated. Never rates, sizes, classifies, resolves or declares protection adequate. Use when the user asks to "write the process safety flags", "produce the process safety section of the P&ID enrichment", "list which protection questions this P&ID raises" or "map the HAZOP and relief study evidence to the draft" after gate G2, once the piping and instrumentation sections exist. Do not use for proposing loops, alarms or trips from the control philosophy, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment instead; do not use for checking identifiers, use tagging-and-numbering. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes the piping content a P&ID adds to an accepted PFD process model: line inventory with off-page continuity and required ancillary lines, line identification elements per the project line numbering procedure, connection items at nozzles matched to a quoted schedule, per quoted standards, specification break questions and observations. Every proposal cites its source and revision; no source, no proposal; never sizes a line or selects a class. Use when the user asks to "run the piping enrichment", "start the discipline enrichment", "list the lines the P&ID adds to this PFD" or "fill the line identifiers from the numbering procedure" after gate G2. Do not use for instruments, loops or instrument tags, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment instead; do not use before gate G2, use process-model-check. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational guide for integrating the NV oOS Complete purchase flow (vendor checkout API client) into standalone WordPress plugins — docs-hub 0.5.3 (stack added in PR #6963, shipped 0.5.2 → 0.5.3) and nvoos-content-graph 1.0.10 (live). Covers the vendor API contract (session/verify/health, nvoos-oos-complete product, 424/502 error passthrough), the five-class client stack (config, vendor client, license store, installer, REST controller), the purchase-modal JS/CSS port recipe (class-prefix rename, keep-the-JS-identical trick), wp.org commerce compliance (External Services disclosure, WPORG-REVIEW-COMMERCE-NOTES.md, js.stripe.com service exception), and the checkout test conventions (direct controller calls, pi_ fixture rules, zero-HTTP assertions). Use when adding the Get NV oOS Complete upsell/checkout to a plugin, porting the commerce stack to a new standalone plugin, extending the purchase flow, or debugging a checkout integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational guide for the NV oOS Dictation desktop companion app (Tauri v2 + Rust, examples/nvoos-dictate) — build/run on Windows/MSVC, the local-first engine track (parakeet/whisper/moonshine/silero-vad, all API-verified against pinned crate versions), the embedded remote-STT fallback against the Embedded addon's transcribe route, model registry + verification harnesses, the plugins.updater boot-crash config rule, and the full test/clippy gate matrix. Use when building, extending, or debugging the dictation app, adding an engine or model, touching the cleanup pipeline golden tests, or continuing the P2/P4/P5/distribution follow-up work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational guide for the ArtCraft MCP integration — the community Python rebuild (C:\Users\rasta\artcraft-mcp-py\artcraft_mcp_server.py) that replaces the broken upstream artcraft-mcp.exe, the live api.storyteller.ai/v1 API map (required headers, cookie auth, endpoint schemas), the upstream bug/PR trail (issues #1/#3, PR #2), the reverse-engineering playbook (browser capture, cookie injection, schema fishing via validation errors, handshake replay, Windows MITM kit), and the generic MCP-protocol debugging playbook (snake_case servers, the shim pattern, 'missing field protocolVersion' diagnosis). Use when working on ArtCraft MCP tools, debugging an artcraft server connection, extending the Python rebuild, or diagnosing any third-party MCP handshake failure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Per-toolkit hardening audit loop for NV oOS Pro tools. Systematically scans each addons/pro/includes/tools/<toolkit> (and its plugins/nvoos-content-graph-pro mirror) for the four recurring production failure classes — unguarded shell calls that fatal on exec-disabled hosts, calls to nonexistent client methods, string-assuming parsing of provider responses that may be arrays, and provider enum/service mismatches — then fixes, tests (Docker PHPUnit), and validates (phpcs both standards) before moving to the next toolkit. Use when asked to audit a toolkit, review the X tools for similar issues, do the same for the other toolkits, or continue the toolkit audit loop. The first case study (document-generation) found 3 fatal bugs + 1 broken regex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Registers a custom WooCommerce shipping method with explicit control over which fields appear in the per-zone settings modal — extend WC_Shipping_Method, declare your fields in init_form_fields (and ONLY those fields, no unset / DOM hacks / CSS hides), set the $supports array to control whether the modal opens (omit 'instance-settings' to suppress it entirely), register via the woocommerce_shipping_methods filter, load the class on woocommerce_shipping_init. Corrects the "this is React, removing fields is hard" misconception — the zone-method modal is Backbone with a PHP-rendered settings_html string; the field list is wholly PHP-controlled. Use when scaffolding a shipping method or when you want a feature-flag-only modal without WC defaults. Triggers on WC_Shipping_Method, woocommerce_shipping_methods, woocommerce_shipping_init, init_form_fields with shipping context, $supports shipping-zones, calculate_shipping, add_rate, or "remove default fields from shipping method".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "map our positioning", "name our competitive alternatives", or "pick a beachhead segment for the launch"; produces a Dunford-style positioning canvas — named competitive alternatives (including spreadsheet and status quo), unique attributes (verifiable, or routed to the claims ledger), value themes (attribute→benefit→value chains), a target beachhead segment scored on serviceability / pain intensity / reachability, and a one-sentence onlyness statement — the sole upstream of the message house and the entity-signal source for the canonical entity profile. Not for the message house or per-channel launch copy — use message-house-builder; not for audience/persona profiling itself — use audience-mapper; not for SEO keyword positioning — use keyword-research. 定位画布/竞争替代品/独特价值/滩头细分

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "author our durable brand message hierarchy", "build the brand message house that seeds the canon", or "define the main narrative, three pillars, and tagline for the whole brand"; produces the DURABLE brand message system — main narrative, three value pillars, per-persona proof points (each labeled Measured / User-provided / '[needs source]'), and the tagline/one-liner — that seeds the narrative-registry canon and from which every per-launch house derives. Not for a single launch's message house or PR-FAQ — use message-house-builder; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry; not for the change-narrative arc itself — use strategic-narrative-designer. 品牌消息屋/主叙事/三支柱/标语/持久叙事 canon

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "map what our surfaces say today", "inventory our current messaging", or "find the gap between what we say and what we mean"; produces the narrative baseline — a surface-by-surface inventory of what every owned touchpoint (homepage, pricing, docs, decks, social bios, email footers) claims RIGHT NOW, each line labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated, plus a per-surface gap read vs the intended message and the drift-baseline snapshot the Evaluate phase measures future drift against. Not for authoring the canon — use message-system-architect; not for scoring the surfaces or running the vetoes — use narrative-quality-auditor. 现状叙事盘点/各触点口径/意图差距/漂移基线

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a wall of album covers, an image wall, a covers grid, or any square art drifting slowly in the background of a site. Includes collecting their saved albums from Spotify and building the wall from them. The wall goes behind whatever front the site already has; a frosted panel is the default when the site has none.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Distill an already-built or near-launch product into one incisive brand kernel — the "reveal" already hiding in its name, story, or the product itself — then build the name, voice, visual identity, and a developer-ready handoff kit around it. This is LATE-STAGE branding: use it when there is a real, thought-through product that is about to launch, or already live but not explained in a way people grasp in an instant. Use whenever the user wants to name or rename a product, find a tagline or slogan, create a brand identity / brand kit / style guide / design system, design a logo, wordmark, palette, or type system, mock up a homepage for a launch, or hand brand assets to a coding agent (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor). Trigger even when the user only says their product needs to "land" or "feel like" something, or that they can't explain it simply yet. Do NOT use for half-baked, pre-product ideas with nothing to excavate — this skill extracts a kernel that already exists; it does not invent one from a blank canvas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a pull request from the current branch for claude-statusline, into the right base for this repo's two-tier flow — feature branches (`dev-<feature>`) target `dev`, and `dev` itself targets `master` as a release PR. Analyzes the new commits, drafts a PR title and a Summary/Test-plan body matching this repo's existing PR style, previews it for approval, then creates it via the `gh` CLI. Use whenever the user says "pr", "pull request", "open a pr", "create pr", "ship it", "merge into dev", "merge into master", "raise a pr", or anything about getting the current branch merged — even if they don't say the word "skill".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomously improve a real artifact (code, training recipe, agent harness, data pipeline, prompt) against an objective and an evaluator, using Hypothesis Tree Refinement (HTR) from the Arbor paper. Use this whenever someone wants to iteratively optimize something over many experiments without overfitting — e.g. "get my model's eval score up", "improve this agent/harness", "tune this pipeline", "beat the baseline on this benchmark", "run a search over approaches and keep the best", "do an MLE-bench / Kaggle-style optimization", or any long-horizon "make this artifact better and don't just memorize the dev set" task. Trigger it even when the user doesn't say "Arbor" or "hypothesis tree" but describes repeated experiment-and-evaluate loops, branching exploration of competing ideas, or worries about a dev/test gap. Runs Claude itself as the coordinator with subagent executors in isolated git worktrees; for the standalone `arbor` CLI tool see references/arbor-upstream.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Browse, inspect, re-export, embed, or iterate on videos that already exist in the user's Ozor.ai account. Use this skill whenever the user wants to work with past or in-progress Ozor videos rather than create a new one — e.g. 'list my Ozor videos', 'show my recent videos', 'what's the status of my last video', 'get the embed code for that video', 'download my last Ozor video', 'share link for the explainer I made', 'check on the export', 'send a follow-up edit to that video', 'show the plan for video X', 'render that video again at 9:16', 'is the job done yet'. This skill orchestrates list_videos, get_video, get_job, get_plan, update_plan, send_message, wait_for_job, export_video, wait_for_export, and get_embed_code. Do NOT use this skill to create a new video from scratch — use ozor-generate, ozor-document-video, or ozor-url-to-video.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search the Unique AI Platform knowledge base using the unique-cli search command, with automatic per-turn citation tracking so cited facts render as clickable reference chips and `<sup>N</sup>` footnotes on the Unique platform. Use whenever the user asks to find, search, or query documents or content on Unique, including filtering by folder or metadata. Also covers `unique-cli read <cont_id>` for reading the full indexed text of a document when its content ID is already known. NOTE: This search uses combined vector + full-text indexing. Excel (.xlsx/.xls), CSV (.csv), and image files are NOT full-text indexed, so they will not appear in search results. To locate these file types, use the unique-cli-file-management skill instead (browse folders with `unique-cli ls` to find them by name).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use to create, update or run the spec-animation mockup under lean/mockup — "run the mockup", "show the model on a screen", "try this scenario", "demo for the expert", "save a golden" — and to build the domain-language screens that let the expert review the model without reading JSON. The mockup executes the Lean model as-is; no logic in JS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Product-launch command desk (Busabase App-in-Skill) built on the RAMP discipline — Research / Assemble / Mobilize / Prove. The agent assembles the launch checklist and drafts launch assets, channel submissions (Product Hunt / Hacker News / directories), press pitches, and the launch-day runbook; the human approves the launch-readiness gate and steers launch day in a review UI. Use when the user invokes $kelly-launch or /kelly-launch, or mentions launching / shipping a product, a launch checklist or runbook, launch readiness, RAMP, Product Hunt / Show HN / press-kit / launch-email drafting, or wants to review and approve launch assets and channel submissions before they go public. This is launch OPERATIONS — the checklist, assets, submissions, and runbook — not a launch video (for a promo video use product-launch-video).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects moving data through pipelines. Watches the three delivery surfaces — CDP destinations and transformations (hog functions), batch exports, and hog flows (workflows/messaging) — for contradictions between configured state and actual delivery: functions the watcher quietly degraded or disabled, failure rates stepping above a pipeline's own baseline, batch export runs failing or stalling (a growing data gap), and active flows failing for the people they trigger on. Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。