1.3万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when optimizing or reviewing large lists, virtual scrolling, windowing, react-window, TanStack Virtual, variable-height rows, dynamic measurement, infinite scroll, grid virtualization, or scroll performance; Chinese triggers include virtual lists, large list optimization, scroll performance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning or reviewing a frontend testing strategy, selecting the right test layer by risk, mapping coverage across static checks, unit tests, component tests, integration tests, E2E, Storybook/visual regression, a11y, security, performance, or CI gates. Do not use to write individual component/E2E tests or merely run existing validation commands; Chinese triggers include test strategy, test layering, test plan, coverage matrix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building or reviewing substantial forms with React Hook Form, Zod schemas, typed validation, dynamic fields, controlled third-party inputs, file upload, multi-step flows, dependent validation, or form performance. Do not use for trivial 1-3 field forms without validation; Chinese triggers include form, form validation, dynamic fields.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when choosing, implementing, reviewing, or refactoring frontend state ownership across React, Vue, Next.js, Nuxt, URL state, server state, form state, browser persistence, or global stores. Prefer narrower skills for TanStack Query cache details, browser storage persistence, or form validation internals; Chinese triggers include state management, state ownership, store selection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating or reviewing Next.js 14+ App Router projects, file routes, layouts, server/client component boundaries, SSR/SSG/ISR, streaming, metadata, middleware, server actions, or Next-specific data fetching. For generic client React component architecture, apply the project's React conventions separately; Chinese triggers include Next.js, App Router.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating or reviewing Nuxt 3 projects, file routes, pages, layouts, SSR/SSG/SPA behavior, Nuxt data fetching, route middleware, plugins, modules, server routes, or Nuxt-specific Vue 3 conventions. For generic Vue component architecture, apply the project's Vue conventions separately; Chinese triggers include Nuxt, Nuxt 3.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing or improving frontend accessibility, semantic structure, keyboard support, focus management, ARIA labels, screen reader behavior, WCAG 2.2 issues, touch accessibility, or assistive-technology regressions; Chinese triggers include accessibility, accessibility, a11y, WCAG, screen reader.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementing or reviewing SVG animation, path drawing, icon motion, logo animation, illustration motion, micro-interactions, CSS/SMIL/Framer Motion/GSAP choices, motion accessibility, or fallback behavior; Chinese triggers include SVG animation, path stroke, animation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing, implementing, or reviewing responsive frontend layouts, mobile-first breakpoints, container queries, fluid grids, data-dense tables, touch targets, safe areas, orientation changes, viewport overflow, or cross-device UI behavior; Chinese triggers include responsive layouts, mobile-side adaptation, breakpoints, container queries, horizontal and vertical screens, touch targets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing, implementing, or reviewing Tailwind CSS design systems, token mapping, theme extension, utility class governance, component variants, dark mode, responsive utilities, safelists, or maintainable class composition; Chinese triggers include Tailwind, design Token, component variants, dark mode, class management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shape, implement, review, copy-edit, or harden Arcade user interfaces. Use for the website, terminal UI, game HUDs, interaction flows, responsive behavior, accessibility, Geist consistency, and any change affecting what a user sees, understands, chooses, or does. Skip backend-only, telemetry-only, generated-file, and test-only work with no shipped UI impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a well-structured GitHub PR with proper branching, testing, formatting, and documentation. Use when the user says "create a PR", "make a PR", "open a pull request", or wants to submit changes for review. Handles the full workflow: branch creation, implementation, testing, formatting, committing, and PR creation with comprehensive descriptions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Environmental Compliance Inspector — reviewing discharge monitoring reports or emissions data against permit limits, classifying a facility's hazardous waste generator status, calculating a penalty for a documented violation, deciding whether an exceedance warrants a Notice of Violation versus informal correction, or scoping a multimedia (air/water/waste) inspection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an environmental scientist — scoping or reviewing a Phase I/Phase II environmental site assessment, interpreting soil or groundwater sampling results against regulatory action levels, drafting an environmental impact statement or NEPA scoping document, running a contaminant fate-and-transport screening calc, or assessing ecological risk to a receptor.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a rotary drill operator (driller) — diagnosing a drilling break or kick warning sign, running well-control shut-in and kill-mud-weight calculations, setting trip margin and swab/surge limits before pulling out of hole, optimizing weight-on-bit and RPM against mechanical specific energy, or reviewing a rig-floor near-miss.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Environmental Restoration Planner — screening or comparing CERCLA/RCRA remedial alternatives against the nine evaluation criteria, building a life-cycle cost estimate for a Feasibility Study, scoping a stream or wetland restoration design against a reference reach, sizing compensatory mitigation credits, drafting a Statement of Work or Remedial Action Work Plan, or scoping a Five-Year Review for a site with land-use controls in place.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electrical Engineer working in power systems — sizing a service or feeder from NEC demand factors, running a short-circuit study and checking breaker interrupting ratings, computing arc-flash incident energy and assigning a PPE category, checking protective-device coordination (selectivity), or reviewing a single-line diagram before construction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Environmental Science Professor — deciding whether a field exercise crosses a weather/safety cancel threshold, building an NSF/EPA proposal budget, normalizing an interdisciplinary tenure case against the right benchmark, checking whether a mixed-methods field project needs IRB review, or handling a politically charged classroom topic without losing academic-freedom footing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an environmental engineer — designing or sizing a wastewater/water treatment process, drafting or reviewing an NPDES or Title V air permit application, scoping a contaminated-site remediation (RI/FS), evaluating whether a process change triggers a permit modification, or checking a discharge/emissions dataset against regulatory limits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a DevOps/Site Reliability Engineer — designing deployment pipelines, setting SLOs/error budgets, responding to or reviewing an incident, or making infrastructure/reliability tradeoffs. Distinct from a backend software engineer role — this one owns the system's operational health across all services, not one service's feature code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer and Information Research Scientist — designing an ablation to attribute an empirical gain, budgeting an NSF CISE proposal against page and content limits, deciding what reproducibility artifacts to release with a paper, screening a draft for mathiness or terminology misuse, or scoping the consent/ethics review needed before running an experiment on real users.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer Hardware Engineer — designing a power delivery network and selecting decoupling capacitors for a digital IC's core rail, budgeting a high-speed signal's rise time against trace impedance and via stub length, closing static timing on a board-level DDR or SerDes interface, sizing thermal resistance for a package's TDP, or reviewing a PCB layout for signal- or power-integrity risk before fab release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a corrections sergeant or shift supervisor — mandating overtime to restore a post below minimum staffing, reviewing and countersigning a subordinate's use-of-force report, running progressive discipline for a line officer, assuming incident command during a multi-officer response, or handling a first-level inmate grievance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a systems engineer/architect working at the whole-program level — decomposing requirements across hardware/software/network subsystems, writing or reviewing an interface control document (ICD), making a build-vs-buy tradeoff for a subsystem, or tracing a verification failure back through the requirements baseline. Distinct from a software engineer (owns one service's code) or DevOps/SRE (owns operational reliability) — this role owns the technical baseline for a whole system-of-systems and is accountable when subsystems built by different teams or vendors don't fit together.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。