「analysis」の検索結果

List, find, and show Azure resources across subscriptions or resource groups. Handles prompts like "list the websites in my subscription", "list my web apps", "show my app services", "list virtual machines", "list my VMs", "show storage accounts", "find container apps", and "what resources do I have". USE FOR: list websites, list web apps, list app services, show websites in subscription, resource inventory, find resources by tag, tag analysis, orphaned resource discovery (not for cost analysis), unattached disks, count resources by type, cross-subscription lookup, and Azure Resource Graph queries. DO NOT USE FOR: deploying/changing resources (use azure-deploy), cost optimization (use cost-optimization from the optional azure-cost plugin), or non-Azure clouds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze actual Azure spend, bill changes, and AKS or AI costs. WHEN: "Azure cost breakdown", "most expensive resources", "why did my bill increase", "cost spike", "unexpected charge", "Cosmos DB charges", "Foundry model costs", "AKS cluster cost", "namespace cost", "enable AKS cost analysis", "idle AKS capacity". DO NOT USE FOR: forecasts, pricing estimates, rightsizing, commitments, or budgets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authoring conventions for exploratory data analysis notebooks and analytical dashboards, covering section sequence, visualization selection, scale thresholds, caching and state, and dashboard validation budgets. Use when composing or reviewing an EDA notebook, an analytical dashboard, or a dashboard test pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Google Takeout exports of Gemini conversation history. Use when the user mentions Gemini takeout, Gemini export, Gemini history, Gemini conversation analysis, Google Takeout zip analysis, or drags a takeout zip into the project. Also use when the user asks to "analyze my Gemini data", "what did I talk to Gemini about", or wants to extract insights from Gemini chat logs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map an organisation's risks against its insurance policy portfolio to find what's uncovered, underinsured, or double-covered. Use when asked to run a coverage gap analysis, review an insurance programme against a risk register, check what risks aren't insured, or audit a policy portfolio. Produces a risk-by-coverage matrix, flagged gaps and overlaps, a deductible stack review, and recommendations ranked by expected-loss severity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a prioritised compliance checklist for GDPR, SOC 2, ISO 27001, FCA, HIPAA, or other frameworks with a gap analysis. Use when asked for a compliance checklist, gap analysis, readiness assessment, or audit preparation for any regulatory framework. Produces a structured checklist with prioritised gaps, quick wins, and evidence requirements. Optimised for Opus 4.7 and newer models. Not a substitute for legal or compliance professional advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants to build a financial model — 3-statement model, DCF valuation, LBO, SaaS unit economics, sensitivity / scenario analysis, debt schedule, or fundraising projections — in Excel. Trigger on: 'financial model', '3-statement model', 'P&L + BS + CF', 'DCF', 'WACC', 'NPV', 'terminal value', 'LBO', 'debt schedule', 'cash sweep', 'MOIC', 'IRR / XIRR', 'sensitivity table', 'scenario analysis', 'ARR model', 'unit economics', 'CAC / LTV', 'cap table forecast'. Output is a single formula-driven .xlsx. This skill is a scene layer on top of officecli-xlsx — it inherits every xlsx v2 rule (4-color code, visual floor, number formats, cache-drift, Known Issues, Delivery Gate minimum cycle). DO NOT invoke for a simple budget tracker, CSV dump, or operational KPI sheet — route those to officecli-xlsx base.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architecture specialist for software/system design, module and service boundaries, tradeoff analysis, and stakeholder synthesis. Uses context-aware methods such as diagnostic routing, design-twice comparison, ATAM-style risk analysis, CBAM-style prioritization, and ADR-style decision records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect business logic vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: threat modeling (domain analysis and attack scenarios), batched verify (check exploitable gaps in parallel subagents, 3 scenarios each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers price manipulation, workflow bypass, limit violations, race conditions, reward abuse, etc. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/businesslogic-results.md. Use when asked to find business logic, logic flaws, or abuse-of-function bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform codebase analysis and architecture mapping as the first phase of a security assessment. Explores the tech stack, frameworks, entry points, data flows, and trust boundaries. Outputs sast/architecture.md. Run this before any vulnerability detection skill. Use when asked to analyze a codebase for security or when sast/architecture.md does not yet exist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Content quality and E-E-A-T analysis with AI citation readiness assessment. Use when user says "content quality", "E-E-A-T", "content analysis", "readability check", "thin content", or "content audit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep single-page SEO analysis covering on-page elements, content quality, technical meta tags, schema, images, and performance. Use when user says "analyze this page", "check page SEO", "single URL", "check this page", "page analysis", or provides a single URL for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Backlink profile analysis: referring domains, anchor text distribution, toxic link detection, competitor gap analysis. Works with free APIs (Moz, Bing Webmaster, Common Crawl) and DataForSEO extension. Use when user says backlinks, link profile, referring domains, anchor text, toxic links, link gap, link building, disavow, or backlink audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

E-commerce SEO analysis: Google Shopping visibility, Amazon marketplace intelligence, product schema validation, competitor pricing analysis, and marketplace keyword gaps. Combines on-page product SEO with marketplace data from DataForSEO Merchant API. Use when user says "ecommerce SEO", "product SEO", "Google Shopping", "marketplace SEO", "product schema", "Amazon SEO", "product listings", "shopping ads", or "merchant SEO".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep-dive 7-day analysis across all data sources for weekly reviews, board prep, and strategic planning

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates an x-ray.md pre-audit report covering overview, enhanced threat model (protocol-type profiling, git-weighted attack surfaces, temporal risk analysis, composability dependency mapping), invariants, integrations, docs quality, test analysis, and developer/git history. Triggers on 'x-ray', 'audit readiness', 'readiness report', 'pre-audit report', 'prep this protocol', 'protocol prep', 'summarize this protocol'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating the model and analyzing results for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript so it survives expert systems review — independent model evaluation (observed vs. simulated, fit statistics), sensitivity and uncertainty analysis, and trade-off / scenario analysis across the system. Guides evaluation norms; it does not fabricate results or run the model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing and reporting the analysis for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — qualitative coding and data-to-theory construction, or quantitative estimation and robustness. Makes the evidence-to-theory link transparent; it does not design the study (see asq-methods).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing and justifying the research design for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — qualitative (grounded-theory, ethnographic, historical) or quantitative — and setting the rigor bar. Designs the study; it does not run the analysis (see asq-data-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when articulating what an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript contributes — converting findings into a claim that changes how the field understands accounting's social, organizational, behavioral or institutional operation. Frames the payoff; it does not produce new analysis (aos-data-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) revise-and-resubmit arrives — planning revisions that may include recoding field data, new experimental conditions, or deepened theorizing, and drafting the point-by-point response to an interdisciplinary reviewer panel. Drafts the response; it does not run new analysis (aos-data-analysis) or the final preflight (aos-submission).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building the exhibits of an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — data-inventory and evidence tables for qualitative work, cell-means and process-test tables for experiments, and figures that carry theoretical weight — in Elsevier-compatible format. Builds exhibits; it does not run the analysis (aos-data-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the theoretical argument and hypotheses are the bottleneck for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — building a mechanism and deriving testable hypotheses a priori. Constructs the theory; it does not run the analysis (amj-data-analysis) or write the final contribution paragraph (amj-contribution-framing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when stress-testing the LOGIC of an Academy of Management Review (AMR) theory manuscript — checking logical coherence, running thought experiments and counterfactuals, addressing alternative explanations and disconfirming cases, and verifying each proposition follows from its argument. This is ARGUMENT DEVELOPMENT, NOT data analysis; AMR publishes no datasets, no statistics, and no empirical results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。