1.6万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Implement Apollo.io reference architecture. Use when designing Apollo integrations, establishing patterns, or building production-grade sales intelligence systems. Trigger with phrases like "apollo architecture", "apollo system design", "apollo integration patterns", "apollo best practices architecture".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and optimize an Algolia search path using repository and production evidence instead of universal latency targets. Use when search feels slow, payloads are large, or rendering regresses. Trigger with "tune Algolia performance", "slow Algolia search", or "search latency".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a production Alchemy architecture with capability-specific adapters, explicit trust boundaries, partial-state semantics, and reversible operations. Use when reviewing or creating an Alchemy-backed system. Trigger with "Alchemy architecture", "design an Alchemy dApp backend", or "review Alchemy boundaries".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choose among direct service integration, Adobe App Builder, and a dedicated queued worker using evidence about ownership, latency, scale, storage, events, and operations. Use when the task requires adobe architecture variant decision. Trigger with "choose Adobe architecture", "App Builder or microservice", or "Adobe design options".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define an Abridge reference architecture that separates vendor, EHR, identity, device, customer, and clinical authority boundaries. Use when reviewing an enterprise Abridge design. Trigger with "design the Abridge architecture".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rigorous, defensible email-spoofability verdict and SPF supply-chain risk analysis computed from published DNS alone. Deepens the record-level SPF/DMARC/DKIM/BIMI/MTA-STS/DNSSEC fetch recipes in the offensive-osint arsenal (§16.14) with the reasoning that section doesn't do: a priority-ordered composite verdict for whether an attacker can actually land header-From-spoofed mail in an inbox, and by which vector (exact-domain vs subdomain) — grounded in the single most-misunderstood distinction in email security: the envelope MAIL FROM that SPF authenticates vs the visible header From: that only DMARC governs. Explains precisely why SPF -all/~all alone is NOT spoof-proof without DMARC enforcement, and why SPF +all bypasses DMARC even under p=reject pct=100. Covers RFC 7208 §4.6.4's 10-DNS-lookup / 2-void-lookup PermError fail-open condition with a runnable stdlib-only lookup-counter script, plus the SPF-include-takeover supply-chain vector (an attacker re-registering a dead include inherits SPF-pass authority over the victim domain) with strict transient-vs-NXDOMAIN discrimination discipline so a temporary SERVFAIL is never mistaken for a takeover lead. Fully passive: DNS TXT reads only, no mail sent, no RCPT TO probe, no API keys. Use when auditing a domain's real spoofing resistance (not just its published records), explaining to a client why 'we have SPF -all' does not mean they're covered, investigating an SPF PermError or an unusually long include chain, evaluating a dead SPF include as a takeover lead, or writing a defensible spoofability finding for a deliverable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish what is actually true and current for the surface you are about to change — not just search. Grounding = locate the authoritative source and reconcile sources that disagree (code vs doc, migration vs schema, memory vs current code, live vs archived), not take the first hit. Use before any grep/find/explore of the codebase or docs, when deciding which of several definitions is the real one, or when a doc or memory conflicts with the code. Covers the source-of-truth hierarchy, reconciliation discipline, scoped ripgrep, and the docs/tags.yml + docsearch.py index.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Web search and content extraction via Brave Search API. Use for searching documentation, facts, or any web content. Lightweight, no browser required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Web search and research using Perplexity AI. Use when user says "search", "find", "look up", "ask", "research", or "what's the latest" for generic queries. NOT for library/framework docs (use Context7) or workspace questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure software around the Dependency Rule: source code dependencies point inward from frameworks to use cases to entities. Use when the user mentions "architecture layers", "dependency rule", "ports and adapters (hexagonal)", "onion architecture", "screaming architecture", "where should business logic go", "decouple from the database", "swap the framework without a rewrite", or "keep business rules independent". Also trigger when deciding which layer code belongs in, isolating core logic from infrastructure, defining module boundaries, or debating whether the framework should call your code or the reverse. Covers component principles, boundaries, and SOLID. For code-level quality, see clean-code. For domain modeling, see domain-driven-design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query Google NotebookLM notebooks for source-grounded, citation-backed answers from user-uploaded documents. Manages notebook library, handles Google authentication, and supports smart discovery. Works standalone via /blog notebooklm or internally from blog-write and blog-researcher for source-grounded research context. Falls back gracefully when not configured. Use when user says "notebooklm", "notebook", "query notebook", "ask notebook", "notebook research", "source grounded research", "document query", "notebook library".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read research outline, launch independent agent for each item for deep research. Disable task output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add items (research objects) to existing research outline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommend a data-portal architecture (storage, compute, catalog, access, hosting, metadata) from stated needs, then hand off to the build skills. The advisory entry point. Use when starting a new data-portal project and the underlying architecture has not yet been decided.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs system structure and makes architectural decisions defensible — boundaries, coupling, trade-offs, and recording why. Use this to design a new system or major component, choose between architectural options, review an existing design, decide where a boundary belongs, or document an architectural decision so it survives the people who made it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Qianfan Deep Research Agent for complex research tasks. Combines information retrieval, multi-source analysis, content synthesis, and report generation. Use when user needs in-depth research, analysis reports, or comprehensive investigation on complex topics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research-before-coding workflow. Search for existing tools, libraries, and patterns before writing custom code. Invokes the researcher agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structures and writes discussion sections for academic papers and research reports. Use when writing a discussion section, interpreting research results, connecting findings to existing literature, addressing study limitations, synthesizing conclusions, or drafting any part of...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates complete phenotype-scoring bioinformatics research designs for any disease context and any user-defined phenotype, pathway, process, signature, or molecular program. Use when a study centers on gene-set or feature-set definition, intersection with DEGs or candidate features, phenotype scoring, feature selection, diagnostic or stratification assessment, immune or cellular-resolution interpretation, network analysis, and optional orthogonal validation. Covers five study patterns (signature discovery, phenotype scoring, feature selection, immune/cellular interpretation, multi-layer validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Matches a user’s biomedical research direction, disease problem, study aim, data modality, and resource constraints to the most relevant recent algorithms and method papers. Always search real recent algorithm literature first, prioritize the last 12 months, expand to 1–3 years only when needed, and add canonical baselines only when necessary. Every formal algorithm recommendation must include the verified primary method paper, plus published downstream papers that actually cite/use the algorithm when such papers are found, with DOI when available. Never fabricate papers, algorithm names, authors, journals, years, DOI, PMID, links, or benchmark claims. If no directly verified algorithm paper is found, say so explicitly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates complete comorbidity-oriented shared-biomarker bioinformatics research designs from a user-provided disease pair and validation direction. Use when a study links two clinically related diseases through shared DEGs, enrichment, PPI hub genes, machine-learning feature selection, public diagnostic validation, gene-regulatory networks, immune infiltration, and optional downstream follow-up. Covers five study patterns (shared-DEG discovery, hub-gene prioritization, machine-learning biomarker selection, immune/regulatory interpretation, multi-layer validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates complete conventional non-oncology diagnostic machine-learning research designs from a user-provided disease context, optional mechanism theme, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on disease-vs-control transcriptome comparison, optional mechanism-gene restriction, feature shrinkage, diagnostic model construction, ROC / calibration / DCA evaluation, interpretation layers, and orthogonal validation. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs complete single-cell research plans from a user-provided biomedical direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, scope, or structure a single-cell study — including disease-focused, mechanism-focused, biomarker-focused, translational, perturbation-inspired, or validation-aware projects. It should define the research question, choose the best-fit study pattern, recommend sample grouping logic, suggest reference datasets as examples only, specify the core analysis modules, propose a validation ladder, and output four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+). Never fabricate datasets, sample metadata, accession numbers, cohort availability, cell-type labels, external validation resources, or literature references. Always include the mandatory Dataset Disclaimer immediately before any workflow section that mentions datasets or public resources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates complete conventional non-oncology bioinformatics research designs from a user-provided disease context, process-related gene family or biological theme, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on multi-dataset bulk transcriptome integration, DEG analysis, process-gene intersection, enrichment analysis, GSEA, PPI hub-gene prioritization, TF/miRNA regulatory networks, ROC-based biomarker evaluation, and immune infiltration analysis. Covers five study patterns (process-DEG discovery, enrichment/GSEA interpretation, hub-gene prioritization, regulatory-network and immune interpretation, multi-layer public validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。