「asks」の検索結果

Guide for writing the introduction to an academic economics paper. Use this skill whenever the user asks for help writing, drafting, revising, or structuring an introduction to an economics paper - whether empirical micro, development economics, applied economics, or related fields. Also trigger when the user mentions "intro," "introduction section," "opening paragraphs," or asks how to motivate, frame, or present their research question in a paper. This skill synthesizes best practices from David Evans (CGDev), Keith Head, Claudia Sahm, Marc Bellemare, and Deirdre McCloskey.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Polish English academic papers for SSCI journal submission. This skill checks grammar, improves readability, and enhances academic tone. Use when the user asks to polish, proofread, edit, or improve their English academic paper, manuscript, or article — especially when targeting SSCI, SCI, or other international journals. Also use when the user asks to "润色", "修改语法", "提升学术性", "polish my paper", or mentions their paper needs language improvement for journal submission. Always trigger on any request involving academic English polishing, even if the user doesn't explicitly say "SSCI."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use this skill when writing, drafting, editing, reviewing, or revising any text to eliminate predictable AI tells, slop, and formulaic patterns. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks to "deslop", "de-AI", "make it sound human," "remove AI patterns," "remove AI tropes," "clean up AI writing," fix "slop," "deslop" text, or review prose for authenticity. Also use when the user asks you to write or draft anything and wants it to sound natural rather than AI-generated. Common use cases include scientific writing (manuscripts, abstracts, cover letters, grant narratives, discussion sections, peer review responses), blog posts, newsletters, memos, reports, and any other substantial prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest + rdrobust + econml + causalml + matplotlib/seaborn. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) — every run produces a publication-ready output set with a multi-column regression table (M1→M6 progressive controls/FE) as the centerpiece, plus Table 1 (descriptives), mechanism / heterogeneity / robustness tables, and event-study + coefficient + trend figures. Covers the full 8-step pipeline an applied economist or quantitative social scientist runs on every paper — (1) data cleaning, (2) variable construction & transformation, (3) descriptive statistics & Table 1, (4) statistical diagnostic tests, (5) baseline empirical modeling, (6) robustness battery, (7) further analysis (mechanism, heterogeneity, mediation, moderation), (8) publication-ready tables & figures. **Also covers two parallel domain modes that share the same 8-step scaffolding** — **Mode A — Epidemiology / public health** (target-trial emulation via `zepid` / hand-rolled `pandas`, IPTW + g-formula + TMLE doubly-robust triplet via `zepid` / `econml` / `lifelines`, Mendelian randomization via `pymr` / `mrtool` (or `rpy2` → `MendelianRandomization`/`TwoSampleMR`), KM / AFT / Cox survival via `lifelines`, E-value sensitivity, principal stratification — STROBE / TRIPOD reporting), and **Mode B — ML causal inference** (DML via `econml.dml` / `doubleml`, S/T/X/R/DR meta-learners via `econml.metalearners` / `causalml`, causal forest via `econml.grf` / `causalml`, Dragonnet / TARNet / CEVAE neural causal via `causalml`, BCF via `pymc-bart` / `bcf-py`, matrix completion, CATE distribution + policy tree via `econml.policy` / `policytree-py`, off-policy evaluation, conformal causal via `mapie`, fairness audit via `fairlearn`, DAG learning via `causal-learn` / `cdt` / LLM-assisted). Prescribes which library to reach for at each step, shows the canonical code, and links to deeper `references/` files for variant-specific patterns. Use when the user asks for a **complete empirical analysis** in Python, wants to replicate an applied-economics paper from scratch, needs a reproducible workflow that is NOT opinionated on any single vertical package (contrast with StatsPAI), wants explicit control over every estimator and diagnostic, or asks "how do I write a full empirical pipeline in Python?". Also triggers when the user names a specific classical step in isolation — "winsorize at 1/99%", "run Breusch-Pagan", "build a Table 1 balance table", "do a placebo test", "event study plot", "mediation analysis" — and wants it wired into the broader pipeline. Mode A triggers on "target trial emulation", "IPTW", "TMLE", "Mendelian randomization", "STROBE", "公共健康", "流行病学". Mode B triggers on "DML", "double machine learning", "causal forest", "meta-learner", "Dragonnet", "BCF", "policy tree", "conformal causal", "fairness audit", "因果机器学习".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create bash scripts", "automate Linux tasks", "monitor system resources", "backup files", "manage users", or "write production shell scripts". It provides ready-to-use shell script templates for system administration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work on or manage records in BB Tasks, including task keys such as ABC-12.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save ideas, observations, content topics, projects, and convictions in ~/path/to/ideas. Use when the user asks to capture an idea or insight. Adds to idea backlogs, not reminders or tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate Lark/Feishu CLI tasks from Codex. Use when a request involves Feishu/Lark docs, wiki, Drive files, Sheets, Base, Calendar, Minutes, IM, Mail, Tasks, Contacts, Slides, whiteboards, approvals, attendance, or when a Lark URL/token must be read, edited, summarized, routed, or turned into a real work artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opt-in evidence-first causal diagnosis for bugs, browser or app/device failures, flaky behavior, and performance regressions. Activate only when the user explicitly invokes `$diagnose` or explicitly asks to use the named diagnose skill. Do not activate merely because the user mentions a bug, asks why something failed, requests debugging or a fix, or describes unexpected behavior. Once explicitly invoked, locate likely causes, instrument relevant boundaries with extensive structured logging, reproduce the issue, analyze the collected logs, rank causes with confidence scores, and pursue 100% operational confidence while probes can increase confidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interact with GitHub using the `gh` CLI. Use `gh issue`, `gh pr`, `gh run`, and `gh api` for issues, PRs, CI runs, and advanced queries. Use when the user asks about GitHub issues, pull requests, workflows, or wants to interact with GitHub repositories from the command line — including tasks like check CI status, create PR, list issues, or query the GitHub API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review how the lean-ctx ctx_* MCP tools performed in the current session and file upstream issues for confirmed problems. Use when the user asks to review/audit lean-ctx tool performance, says "lean-ctx review", asks why ctx_* tools failed or fell back to native tools, or wants to report a lean-ctx bug.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

集中兵力：多件事同时争抢时间、注意力或预算时，列出全部待办，选定唯一主攻目标并公开锁定，彻底解决、验证后再转向下一个。当待办过多、推进分散、"每件都做了一点但都没做完"、需要决定先做什么时触发；只有一个任务、任务彼此独立可并行、用户明确要求同时推进时不触发。 English: Concentrate forces. When several tasks compete for time, attention, or budget, enumerate them, lock onto a single main target, finish and verify it completely, then move on. Trigger when priorities sprawl, effort is scattered, or you must decide what to do first; skip when there is one task, tasks are independent and parallel, or the user explicitly wants them advanced together.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-improving browser automation via the auto-research loop. Iteratively runs a browsing task, reads the trace, and improves the navigation skill (strategy.md) until it reliably passes. Supports parallel runs across multiple tasks using sub-agents. Use when you want to build or improve browser automation skills for specific website tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy serverless browser automation as cloud functions using Browserbase. Use when the user wants to deploy browser automation to run on a schedule or cron, create a webhook endpoint for browser tasks, run automation in the cloud instead of locally, or asks about Browserbase Functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements Manus-style file-based planning for complex tasks. Creates task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md. Use when starting complex multi-step tasks, research projects, or any task requiring >5 tool calls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate implementation tasks from requirements and design. Use when creating actionable task lists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate implementation tasks for a specification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx files). Triggers include: any mention of 'Word doc', 'word document', '.docx', or requests to produce professional documents with formatting like tables of contents, headings, page numbers, or letterheads. Also use when extracting or reorganizing content from .docx files, inserting or replacing images in documents, performing find-and-replace in Word files, working with tracked changes or comments, or converting content into a polished Word document. If the user asks for a 'report', 'memo', 'letter', 'template', or similar deliverable as a Word or .docx file, use this skill. Do NOT use for PDFs, spreadsheets, Google Docs, or general coding tasks unrelated to document generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a website can be found, crawled, and cited by AI answer engines such as ChatGPT Search, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Microsoft Copilot. Use when someone asks why their brand is missing from AI answers, whether AI crawlers can read their site, how to get cited by ChatGPT or Perplexity, or asks for a GEO or AEO (generative / answer engine optimization) review. Produces a citation baseline across buyer-intent prompts, a crawler-access check, a citability review of named pages, and a ranked fix list. Not for keyword rank tracking, paid search, or pages behind a login.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate Asana tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): tasks, projects, sections, teams, workspaces. Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate Close CRM tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): create leads, manage calls/SMS, handle tasks, and track notes. Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate ActiveCampaign tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): manage contacts, tags, list subscriptions, automation enrollment, and tasks. Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage durable working-session memory for coding agents. Use when a user asks to preserve or recover agent context across disconnects, VS Code restarts, long-running work, handoffs, or any session where important state should be written periodically under the repo's session directory. Do NOT use for: simple questions, short tasks, one-off commands, linting, or code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。