「claim」の検索結果

Select an OCR/HTR engine by benchmarking candidates on the same labelled samples — source ground truth from open datasets (e.g. Hugging Face PAGE-XML corpora) or hand-transcription, wrap every engine behind a transcribe(image_path) -> str adapter (vision-LLMs via any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, dedicated HTR REST APIs, cloud OCR), and score with zero-dependency raw CER, lenient CER, WER, and a critical name/date token diff. Use when choosing an engine for handwriting or historical-document transcription, when published accuracy claims need honest verification on your own material, or when a records workflow must surface confident-but-wrong names and dates that a low aggregate CER hides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrite a rule so anyone applies it the same way. Use when a stated rule or claim takes the reader's judgment to apply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One committed verdict on something that exists, cited. Use when something exists and a claim about it needs a verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find out whether a chemical series is already claimed, using SureChEMBL's patent-extracted compound corpus and, where a key is available, PatentsView for legal status and assignee history. Use this skill to trace a structure to the patent documents that disclose it, survey an assignee's filings around a target, and understand what the freedom-to-operate question requires that a structure search cannot answer. Also trigger on SureChEMBL, patent chemistry, Markush structure, freedom to operate, composition of matter, assignee, priority date, patent family, or PatentsView.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user and agent may hold different pictures of current state after a gap, sync request, or exposed stale claim. Not for persistence: use memory-update.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when thumbnail concepts need real-size, accuracy-first scoring without misleading claims. Not for generating thumbnails or declaring winners that fail the accuracy rubric.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when one reviewer is not enough because failure modes are heterogeneous, or a claim needs cross-lens pressure before it ships. Not for collapsing a decision field: use converge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select at most one eligible Proto UI work item and return a read-only proposal without changing GitHub or repository state. Use after pui-orient when requested contribution work is not yet bounded, or when a user asks what ready task fits the current capability and permission envelope. Do not post a claim, assign anyone, decide readiness, or invent work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish one prepared Agent evidence packet as an additive Issue comment, including historical or closed Issues, under exact current authorization. Use after read-only Issue inspection and separately authorized evidence preparation. Do not reproduce, select work, upload assets, edit human text, claim, review, close, or change Issue metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix scattered/torn regions in hex-grid simulated annealing layouts that use "competitive flood-fill" (one tile per region per outer iteration). Use when: (1) regions of >20 tiles end up dispersed instead of forming compact blobs, (2) maxDist/sqrt(N) dispersion ratio is 10×+ worse than the ideal compact blob, (3) tiles assigned to one region show up in multiple disconnected fragments across the layout, (4) the visualization has a "trypophobia ring" pattern at the perimeter where some regions spill into a perimeter spiral, (5) an overflow spiral fallback exists in the layout code and frequently kicks in for large regions, (6) bigger regions look worse than smaller ones (small regions stay compact, big ones shred). Root cause: interleaved competitive flood-fill (round-robin one tile at a time across all regions) lets large regions get boxed in by neighbors before they finish growing — the unfilled remainder is dumped into the overflow spiral at the perimeter, far from the seed. Fix: replace with sequential region-by-region BFS — process regions in size-descending order, fully claim each region's N contiguous tiles before moving to the next.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the Minimum Sufficient Language (MSL) principle through the MSL Kernel to write anything a reader must act on. Bind the reader and what they already know, partition facts from the machinery that produced them, emit each admitted fact as an action, a verification, a judgment, or a state, and stop when every claim is checkable and the reader can act. Use for status updates, work-in-progress reports to your own user, closeout and convergence comments, tickets, pull request and review write-ups, incident and postmortem notes, emails, memos, and any draft for readers outside the work. Also use when the user says MSL, Minimum Sufficient Language, write this for stakeholders, drop the jargon, make this readable, or asks for a paste-ready draft.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads, searches and counts Claude Code session transcripts (the .jsonl files under ~/.claude/projects, subagents too) with the csift command-line tool, and ships hooks that re-inject compacted turns or record pending questions. Use when asked what a past or running session said, did, edited, spent or is doing now; when about to grep, jq or script over a transcript jsonl (a type=="user" filter overcounts the person's messages), count how many messages the person typed, tool calls or tokens, or claim something was never done or decided; to rebuild a lost file or plan from what a session wrote, extract pasted images, restore turns a compaction summary lost, find a subagent's own id when CLAUDE_CODE_SESSION_ID names the parent, wait on or message another session or subagent; or when csift prints "unknown label selector", "show needs an address", "looks like a session/agent id, not a project path" or "0 matches — a DEFINITIVE absence". Not for semantic or embedding search: csift matches regular expressions only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

REQUIRED before declaring a task done when the diff touches user input, SQL, shell, auth, credentials, file paths, serialization, crypto, network endpoints, data deletion, or dependency surface. Judge by that surface, not the task label — research/experimental/local-only code with none of it can skip this. Walks OWASP/ASVS/MITRE questions the compiler and the test suite won't catch. Pair with `rafter run` on the same diff. When the diff has that surface, marking it complete without both has been under-delivered — do not claim done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gathers information from multiple sources in parallel, compares what they say, flags where they agree or conflict, and delivers a clean synthesis with a confidence rating for each finding. Useful for making evidence-backed decisions, when evaluating competing claims, during due diligence on a vendor or market, and for building research briefs before strategy sessions. Use when the user says "research this", "synthesize multiple sources", "compare sources", "research report", "what does the evidence say", "gather information on", or "deep dive into".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured threat assessment methodology. Intent + Capability + Opportunity = Threat Level. Use when formally evaluating a threat. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Confidence is capped by the weakest load-bearing claim, and at Moderate when the evidence is ungraded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to write a threat / risk / vulnerability assessment, or wants the appropriate template for each type. Distinct structures and section ordering per assessment kind. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Confidence is capped by the weakest load-bearing claim, and at Moderate when the evidence is ungraded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about hacktivist activity (Killnet, NoName057(16), IT Army of Ukraine, Anonymous Sudan, RipperSec, CARR, etc.), DDoS-claiming groups, politically-motivated cyber operations, or wartime cyber-ops chatter. Self-updating knowledge cell.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user asks to investigate, check, or characterize a domain or hostname. Chains VirusTotal, URLScan (search existing scans), Shodan (DNS resolve + host), OTX, ransomware.live (victim-status sweep), and optionally Censys. Returns reputation, resolution, hosting fingerprint, ransomware-claim status, and pivot candidates. Invoked by /cti-orchestrator when the target is a domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when assigning a confidence level to an analytical judgment, the user asks "how confident are we?" / "what is the confidence on X?", or the orchestrator's tradecraft pipeline calls for a confidence level before publishing. Provides three named levels (High, Moderate, Low) with 0-100 score ranges aligned to STIX, and the rule that confidence cannot exceed what the weakest load-bearing claim supports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use as the default entry point for any CTI request that doesn't name a specific skill. Activates when a user asks to investigate an indicator, profile a threat actor, write an assessment, enrich IOCs, or build detection rules, and when a user asks where a report or article comes from, how reliable it is, to grade a source, check a report, or split a report into claims, or pastes a bare article URL. Routes to the right investigation, provenance, grading or analysis skill, then auto-applies rigor skills (source rating, TLP, confidence, likelihood) on the output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft privacy policies, terms of service, disclaimers, and legal notices. Creates GDPR-compliant texts, cookie policies, and data processing agreements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitors dark web forums, marketplaces, paste sites, and ransomware leak sites for mentions of organizational assets, leaked credentials, threatened attacks, and threat actor communications to provide early warning intelligence. Use when establishing dark web monitoring coverage, investigating specific data breach claims, or enriching incident investigations with dark web context. Activates for requests involving dark web OSINT, leak site monitoring, credential exposure, Recorded Future dark web, or Tor hidden service intelligence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Research Pilot project needs an experiment proposal from a weak or bounded project claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit, recover, and prepare portable handoffs of existing private PFC2D/PFC3D 5.0 asphalt cases, including integrity manifests, path portability, saved-state claims, cheap restore-first validation, and legacy-state quarantine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。