「code analysis」の検索結果

Map code questions to the optimal tldr command by detecting intent and routing to the right analysis layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish MSBuild/.NET build performance baselines before optimizing. USE FOR: a .NET build or solution that is slow or has build-performance concerns; cold, warm, incremental, or no-op measurements; before/after comparisons; CI build output caching; static graph build decisions; artifacts output; and dependency graph trimming. Start here before build-perf-diagnostics, incremental-build, or build-parallelism. DO NOT USE for webpack, npm, JavaScript bundlers, or other non-MSBuild build systems. For detailed target/task/analyzer bottleneck analysis after baselining, use build-perf-diagnostics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze MSBuild binary logs to diagnose build failures. USE FOR: build errors that are unclear from console output, diagnosing cascading failures across multi-project builds, tracing MSBuild target execution order, and generally any MSBuild build issues. Requires an existing .binlog file. DO NOT USE FOR: generating binlogs (use binlog-generation), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DO NOT INVOKE when the primary request explicitly asks to convert, migrate, modernize, or rewrite a legacy/old-style project to SDK style; use msbuild-modernization. Migration prompts often mention ToolsVersion, explicit Compile/Reference entries, packages.config, or Microsoft.CSharp.targets, but merely reviewing or auditing a file that contains those patterns remains in scope here. USE FOR broad review, audit, lint, or maintainability/correctness checks of project/build files, including custom targets; prioritized cross-cutting findings; discrete anti-patterns; F# ordering/FS0039; cross-platform paths; and focused Import safety verdicts. Review/audit is analysis-only unless fixes are requested. For concrete property/item defects use property-patterns/item-management; use target-authoring for implementation and extension-points for NuGet auto-import/layout discovery. Exclude non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only for MSBuild failure investigation, build-performance analysis, or review of existing build XML/extension contracts. A plan to convert a working legacy/non-SDK project to SDK style or migrate packages.config is a project-system migration, NOT a build-file review: do not activate, even to check scope. Framework/API upgrades are also excluded. Activate for advisory Import/Exists hook and NuGet packed-import questions even without a checkout or failed build; .csproj/.fsproj/.vbproj/.props/.targets conditions; custom-target inputs/outputs; .binlog capture/replay; failing dotnet build/restore/pack/publish or MSBuild-based test builds; slow evaluation, compilation, copying, or no-change builds; and controlled timing comparisons. Exclude SDK installation alone, C# refactoring, runtime profiling, assertions after successful builds, and non-MSBuild builds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Passive and active reconnaissance, subdomain enumeration, DNS analysis, technology fingerprinting, and OSINT data correlation for authorized security assessments

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

IOC extraction, threat intelligence correlation, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, hunt hypothesis generation, and detection rule creation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and post-incident reporting following NIST SP 800-61 and SANS PICERL methodology

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Android and iOS application security testing — static and dynamic analysis, APK/IPA inspection, OWASP MASVS/MASTG verification, secure-storage and transport review, and mobile malware triage for authorized assessments

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational Technology and industrial control system security — Purdue model segmentation, industrial protocol analysis (Modbus, DNP3, S7, EtherNet/IP), PLC/HMI exposure, IEC 62443 alignment, and MITRE ATT&CK for ICS, for authorized and safety-conscious assessments

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Governance, risk, and compliance — risk assessment and scoring, control mapping across NIST CSF 2.0 / ISO 27001:2022 / SOC 2 / CIS Controls v8, gap analysis, audit evidence preparation, and security policy generation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Software supply chain security — SBOM generation and analysis, dependency confusion and typosquatting detection, malicious package indicators, CI/CD pipeline hardening, and artifact provenance/signing (SLSA, Sigstore)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate SQL queries into plain language business logic. Use when documenting queries, explaining analysis to non-technical stakeholders, code reviewing for correctness, or building a query catalog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer a hard question by fanning it out to a PANEL of models running in parallel — each answering independently with web search and bash, none seeing the others' work — then having Opus 4.8 judge every response into a structured analysis (consensus, contradictions, partial coverage, unique insights, blind spots) and write a final answer grounded in it. The panel is two independent Opus 4.8 runs (slug opus4.8-4.8), Opus 4.8 + GPT-5.5 via codex (opus4.8-gpt5.5), Opus 4.8 + Gemini 3.1 Pro via agy (opus4.8-gemini3.1pro), or all three (opus4.8-gpt5.5-gemini3.1pro). Opus always judges and writes the final answer — the pipeline can't be reversed. Runs on local CLI subscriptions (no metered API), and saves a timestamped provenance .md per run. Use this whenever the user asks to "run it through Fusion", says /fusion, wants a multi-model / panel / ensemble answer, wants a question cross-checked across models, or wants a higher-confidence answer with consensus and blind spots surfaced — even if they don't say "fusion". General-purpose: any topic (research, law, strategy, technical, personal). Best for high-stakes research, design calls, and debugging where being confidently wrong is expensive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to add or evaluate Maven dependencies that improve code quality or domain modeling — including nullness annotations (JSpecify), static analysis (Error Prone + NullAway), functional programming (VAVR), architecture testing (ArchUnit), or money and currency support (JavaMoney) — and want a consultative, question-driven approach that adds only what you actually need. This should trigger for requests such as Add Maven dependencies; Add JSpecify nullness dependencies; Add Error Prone NullAway dependencies; Add VAVR functional dependencies; Add ArchUnit architecture testing dependencies; Add JavaMoney dependencies. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds an eval plan for an AI feature - error analysis on real traces, failure-mode ranking, code checks and binary LLM judges validated against human labels, CI tests, production monitoring, and a launch bar. Use when you ask how do we eval this, how do I test an AI feature, our LLM outputs are inconsistent, are the evals good enough, LLM-as-judge, hallucinations, or what accuracy is good enough to launch. Draws on 41 Lenny's Podcast guests incl. Hamel Husain, Shreya Shankar and Sander Schulhoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive performance specialist covering analysis, optimization, load testing, and framework-specific performance. Use when identifying bottlenecks, optimizing code, conducting load tests, analyzing Core Web Vitals, fixing memory leaks, or improving application performance across all layers (application, database, frontend). Includes React-specific optimization patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes your recent Claude Code chat history to identify coding patterns, development gaps, and areas for improvement, curates relevant learning resources from HackerNews, and automatically sends a personalized growth report to your Slack DMs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

【大型代码库分析专用】当需要分析整个项目架构、识别代码模式、追踪功能实现、梳理模块关系时必须使用本技能。触发关键词：分析整个项目/代码库、架构梳理、模块划分、代码模式识别、功能追踪、全局扫描。本技能通过 Gemini CLI 快速扫描完整代码库，提供 AI 驱动的架构洞察和代码分析，大幅节省手动探索时间。仅返回原始分析结果，不做二次解读。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-loaded context for Portfolio Buddy 2 development. Use for ANY task involving: React 19 development, TypeScript, portfolio analysis features, metrics calculations, trading strategy comparison, or working with the Portfolio Buddy 2 codebase. Contains tech stack, known issues, and architectural constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security intelligence for code analysis. Detects SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, authentication issues, crypto failures, and more. Actions: scan, analyze, fix, audit, check, review, secure, validate, sanitize, protect. Languages: JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, PHP, Java, Go, Ruby. Frameworks: Express, Django, Flask, Laravel, Spring, Rails. Vulnerabilities: SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, authentication bypass, authorization issues, command injection, path traversal, insecure deserialization, weak crypto, sensitive data exposure. Topics: input validation, output encoding, parameterized queries, password hashing, session management, CORS, CSP, security headers, rate limiting, dependency scanning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Learn from public breach disclosures — extract the audit question each one implies and check your own stack. Capital One IMDS abuse, LastPass vault exfiltration, Okta Lapsus$, Snowflake credential reuse, MOVEit, SolarWinds, Equifax, Target POS, Codecov, Uber, Twilio — what would you check now if your boss said 'could that happen to us?' Use when the user mentions 'breach analysis,' 'lessons learned,' 'security postmortem,' 'breach patterns,' 'breach lessons,' 'has this happened to us,' 'apply breach lessons,' 'preempt breaches,' 'security retrospective,' 'real-world security incidents,' or wants to harden against known attacker playbooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assist with core product management activities including writing PRDs, analyzing features, synthesizing user research, planning roadmaps, and communicating product decisions. Use when you need help with PM documentation, analysis, or planning workflows that integrate with your codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute Gemini CLI for AI-powered code analysis and generation. Use when you need to leverage Google's Gemini models for complex reasoning tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。