「commit」の検索結果

Performs security-focused differential review of code changes. Adapts analysis depth to codebase size, uses git blame for context, calculates blast radius by counting callers, checks test coverage of modified code, and generates a markdown report. Use when reviewing a PR, commit, or diff for security vulnerabilities, checking whether a change re-introduces a previously fixed bug, asking what else a change could break, or finding which modified code has no test covering it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triages a repository's open GitHub issues and pull requests via the gh CLI. Optionally reviews and merges ready PRs — incrementally merging passing automated/bot PRs and maintainer-approved ones, and spawning review subagents for never-reviewed ones — then closes already-resolved issues with comments citing the resolving PR or commit, cross-links issues with their pending fix PRs, and assigns local-only priority and change-size estimates for everything outstanding. Use when triaging, grooming, or reviewing a repository's open issues and PRs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive offensive methodology for software supply chain attacks covering the full kill chain from reconnaissance through exploitation. Addresses dependency confusion across npm, PyPI, and NuGet ecosystems where internal registry override allows an attacker to inject malicious packages that shadow private dependencies. Covers typosquatting techniques for popular packages, compromised package injection via maintainer account takeover or social engineering, and build system attacks through Makefile injection, setup.py install hooks, and npm postinstall scripts. Extends into CI/CD artifact tampering where build outputs are replaced or modified in transit, code signing abuse through stolen or self-signed certificates, upstream repository compromise via commit injection or force-push to trusted repos, and container image supply chain attacks including base image trojaning and registry confusion. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.001 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools) and T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Integrates tooling such as confused for dependency confusion scanning and dependency-check for known vulnerable component detection. Each technique section provides reproducible proof-of-concept patterns, detection guidance for defenders, and engagement-safe execution notes for authorized red team operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the threat-modeling phase of a security scan, the user explicitly invokes $threat-model, or the user explicitly asks to create, update, or persist a repository threat model. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a pull request, commit, branch diff, or working-tree patch for security vulnerabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the validation phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to determine whether one or more candidate security findings are valid. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly asks to fix and verify a validated or plausible security vulnerability. Do not use for ordinary bug fixes, correctness or design review findings, general validation, or full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for a deep, exhaustive, multi-pass, or variance-reducing repository-wide or scoped-path Codex Security scan. Run repeated complete independent Standard scans with the Codex Security deep-scan tool, which aggregates their validated findings and prepares the canonical artifacts; then complete the same scan once. Do not use for PRs, commits, branch diffs, or working-tree diffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the attack-path-analysis phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to trace a security finding from source to sink and calibrate severity. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for a standard, single-pass security audit of an entire repository or a scoped path, package, folder, or submodule with no diff to review. This is the default repository scan. Do not use for PR, commit, branch, or working-tree diffs, or for deep, multi-pass scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess an immutable patch artifact's program impact, regression risk, and auto-merge eligibility. Use for generated patch files, provider pull-request diffs, or commit ranges when reviewers need evidence about affected runtime paths, contracts, tests, and recoverability. This skill is read-only and does not generate, edit, apply, push, or merge the patch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the finding-discovery phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to discover candidate security findings in a repository or code change. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an end-to-end product strategy session across positioning, discovery, and roadmap planning. Use when a team needs validated direction before committing to execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrites and polishes Chinese or English prose, technical instructions, and product copy. Use when drafting, editing, localizing, or cutting AI tone. Not for code comments or commit messages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a question, decision, plan, tradeoff, or claim needs a rigorous verdict and one perspective is not enough. Spawns a panel of 3 to 5 subagent jurors that form independent blind opinions, deliberate anonymously under an anti-anchoring and anti-sycophancy protocol, and return one committed verdict with confidence, preserved dissent, and a concrete next action. Domain-agnostic across engineering, architecture, data, product, hiring, strategy, vendor choice, build-vs-buy, and research design. Trigger phrases include "convene a jury", "have agents debate and decide", "get a panel to decide", "multi-agent decision", "stress-test this and decide", "monte um juri", "tribunal de agentes", "painel para decidir". Do NOT use to only critique without deciding (use the-fool for that), to build a plan or write the solution itself, or for simple factual lookups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when preparing iPolloWork local changes for GitHub: stash or preserve local edits, sync the current personal branch with remote main, re-apply local work, diagnose conflicts, commit in English, push to the current remote branch, and open a PR to main without creating extra branches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish intentional local changes by confirming scope, creating a branch when needed, staging selected files, committing, pushing, and creating a Draft Pull Request through the connected GitHub service.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert an article, tutorial, or prompt pack into focused reusable AgentSkills, one independent capability per skill, with portable instructions, example prompts, working demos, preview screenshots, validation, gallery updates, and a narrow commit. Use when the user asks to turn an article's prompts, tutorial sections, design patterns, interactions, or workflow ideas into complete skills rather than leaving them as prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert a supplied HTML page or generated HTML reference into a screenshot-backed article containing multiple reusable interaction prompts. Use when the user provides an HTML file, exported page, generated-page.html, or local/live reference and asks to extract animation/interactions, create prompts, capture screenshots for each prompt, add them to an article, or commit the resulting article/assets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and repair LoopX control-plane drift or agent behavior drift. Use when a LoopX task makes unexpectedly small progress, follows a stale or contradictory recommended_action, ignores a higher-priority blocked item while doing fallback work, reports vague owner/user gates, loses todo projection, misaligns benchmark treatment with the real product path, mixes temporary artifacts into commits, or when the user asks for root-cause analysis, self-repair, or why the harness/agent behaved unexpectedly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts and structures source material (articles, transcripts, notes) into a talk summary with narrative arc, themes, metrics, and gaps. Auto-detects REX vs Concept type. Use when starting a new talk from any source material or auditing existing material before committing to a talk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs git archaeology, changelog analysis, and builds a verified factual timeline by cross-referencing git history with source material. REX mode only (skipped automatically in Concept mode). Use when building a REX talk and you need verified commit metrics, release timelines, and contributor data from a git repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate staged changes using LLM-as-a-Judge before committing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate release notes in multiple formats from git commits

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。