「compare」の検索結果

Performs alchemical free-energy calculations including relative binding free energy (RBFE / FEP+) and absolute binding free energy (ABFE) via OpenFE, FEP+, GROMACS, AMBER pmemd, and OpenMM with explicit lambda window scheduling, soft-core potentials, REST2 enhanced sampling, MBAR/BAR analysis, and cycle closure validation. Compares ML alternatives (Boltz-2 affinity, DeepDock). Use when ranking analogs by binding affinity beyond docking accuracy, performing prospective lead optimization, or validating SAR predictions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diff a live page's accessibility violations against a baseline — by default compares uncommitted changes (stash-based), or pass --branch [<name>] to diff against a branch. Reports only new violations introduced, violations fixed, and pre-existing count. Use `scan` for a full audit with no diffing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edit EcoSIM PFT-parameter NetCDF files such as ecosim_pftpar_20260303.nc with the ParEditor class from applications/notebooks/scripts/ParamEditor.py. Use when asked to modify, scale, copy, compare, or delete PFT parameter records for a plant functional type (six-character pfts code such as gr3s43 or ndlf34), update microbe parameter NetCDF values, or maintain the JSONL change log that records past parameter changes. Never modify plant_trait.*.desc files; they are read-only references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract study sites, observational variables, coordinates, climate-forcing sources, and cited data sources from ecosystem-modeling papers, PDFs, supplements, or article text, then plan or create EcoSIM simulation workflows and run folders for those sites. Use when Codex is asked to read a paper for EcoSIM feasibility, including requests phrased as "read paper for ecosim feasibility"; read a paper for sites/data availability; reproduce a published site simulation in EcoSIM; compare EcoSIM outputs to paper observations; or convert paper-derived AmeriFlux, FLUXNET, US NLDAS-domain, non-US ERA5, crop, peatland, forest, grassland, wetland, or unmanaged field-site information into EcoSIM inputs and runnable cases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert AmeriFlux ERA5 half-hourly meteorological CSV files into EcoSIM hourly climate forcing NetCDF files, compare generated forcing against overlapping measured tower meteorology when a FULLSET file is available, and report large biases or errors. Use when preparing or validating EcoSIM climate inputs for AmeriFlux sites, checking ERA5 against in situ records, diagnosing forcing discrepancies, or writing climate-quality reports. For non-AmeriFlux paper sites that need a fresh Copernicus CDS ERA5 point download by longitude/latitude, use era5-cds-point-download first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review or refactor an existing SKILL.md and its bundled resources — a smaller always-loaded core, conditional references, preserved behavior, lean/guided consumer profiles, and an A/B protocol to compare a candidate with the previous version. Use when a skill repeats itself, loads references on every run, triggers too broadly or misses legitimate requests, or needs its efficiency measured across models. Do NOT use for writing a new skill from scratch, refactoring application code, translating a skill verbatim, or performing the target skill's own task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'battle card,' or 'competitor teardown.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Live developer experience audit. Uses the browse tool to actually TEST the developer experience: navigates docs, tries the getting started flow, times TTHW, screenshots error messages, evaluates CLI help text. Produces a DX scorecard with evidence. Compares against /plan-devex-review scores if they exist (the boomerang: plan said 3 minutes, reality says 8). Use when asked to "test the DX", "DX audit", "developer experience test", or "try the onboarding". Proactively suggest after shipping a developer-facing feature. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "dx audit", "test the developer experience", "try the onboarding", "developer experience test".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-deploy canary monitoring. Watches the live app for console errors, performance regressions, and page failures using the browse daemon. Takes periodic screenshots, compares against pre-deploy baselines, and alerts on anomalies. Use when: "monitor deploy", "canary", "post-deploy check", "watch production", "verify deploy". (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performance regression detection using the browse daemon. Establishes baselines for page load times, Core Web Vitals, and resource sizes. Compares before/after on every PR. Tracks performance trends over time. Use when: "performance", "benchmark", "page speed", "lighthouse", "web vitals", "bundle size", "load time". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "speed test", "check performance".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preview and verify imported content in local AEM Edge Delivery Services dev server. Validates rendering, compares with original page, and troubleshoots common issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare two versions of an AEM Edge Delivery Services page to identify what changed. Fetches preview vs live, or two different URLs, and produces a detailed content diff showing added, removed, and modified content, metadata, and blocks. Use when reviewing changes before publishing, auditing content modifications, or tracking content evolution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive dimension analysis and reporting for CJA. Use this skill whenever the user wants to analyze one or more dimensions — including cardinality, distribution/skew, trends, anomalies, data quality errors, comparisons, and forecasting. Also trigger when someone asks "what are the top values for...", "dimension health", "explore this dimension", "dimension dashboard", "dimension statistics", "data quality check on a dimension", "dimension cardinality", "dimension trends", "dimension skew", "dimension anomalies", "compare dimensions", or any similar request to understand what's inside a CJA dimension. Produces an interactive HTML dashboard or a markdown report. Works with the CJA MCP server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BROWSER REVIEW QA SKILL — Use the built-in browser/headless browser (puppeteer-core) to open a browser-runnable Cocos preview, switch preview targets, capture screenshots, and compare them with reference images. USE FOR: screen-driven QA only when the user has already prepared a Browser Review environment that can run in the browser (`http://localhost:7456`, LoadingScene/preview host/preview target wiring ready). DO NOT USE FOR: current Cocos Editor window screenshots, Editor Preview capture, compile errors, or pure log analysis. If the Browser Review environment is not ready, stop and remind the user to prepare it first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent context budget guard and artifact compression workflow. USE FOR: image-heavy QA, compare board review, screenshot batches, large keep/todo/task manifests, long notes handoff, and md/json diff summarization. Trigger this before reading or forwarding heavy artifacts when token growth is a risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set a deliberate visual direction before any UI is built — the single biggest lever against generic AI output. Derives a posture from product-soul/PRD/specs, scores a curated archetype palette, then generates 2-3 GENUINELY DISTINCT directions and compares them side-by-side before committing to one. Load when the user asks to pick an aesthetic, choose a design direction, decide what a UI should feel like, explore visual options, says "what should this look like", "make it feel like [Linear/Apple/ Duolingo]", "give me design directions", "explore some looks", or when frontend-design routes here. Replaces design-archetype. Sub-skill of frontend-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score LLM and agent outputs using LLM-as-judge techniques — direct scoring against rubrics or pairwise comparison between two outputs. Includes built-in bias mitigation for position bias, length bias, and self-enhancement bias. Load when the user asks to score an output, judge a response, evaluate against a rubric, compare two outputs, do direct scoring, run pairwise comparison, or says "rate this", "which response is better", "score this against the rubric", "judge this output", "LLM as judge this". Sub-skill of eval-output orchestrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement several variations of a design directly inside the running app, on the real page/route, with a live switcher to toggle between them in the browser, then recommend one and fold the winner into the real code. Variants are real implementations judged against real data, layout, and density (not an isolated mockup). Use this skill whenever the user wants to try design options live in the app, prototype changes directly on a real page, add a variant switcher, compare layouts in-context, asks to "build a few versions of this page", "try variants on the real screen", "switch between designs in the app", "implement this with a toggle", or says "real-prototype this". For a safe standalone .html copy that never touches the app, use the prototype skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill instead of WebSearch for ANY question requiring web research. Trigger on queries like "what is X", "explain X", "compare X and Y", "research X", or before content generation tasks. Provides systematic multi-angle research methodology instead of single superficial searches. Use this proactively when the user's question needs online information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare cell-type composition and spatial features across conditions in IMC/MIBI cohorts with the patient as the experimental unit, covering pseudoreplication, per-patient aggregation, mixed models, compositional (Dirichlet/scCODA) differential abundance, diffcyt, per-image-to-patient spatial differential testing (SpaceANOVA), batch covariates, and FDR. Use when testing whether a cell type or spatial niche differs between groups, avoiding cell-level pseudoreplication, choosing a differential-abundance method, or correctly powering an IMC cohort comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads, queries, and writes bigWig indexed binary signal tracks (coverage, fold-change, conservation, methylation-rate) with pyBigWig (Python) and the UCSC Kent tools (bedGraphToBigWig, bigWigToBedGraph, bigWigInfo, bigWigSummary, bigWigAverageOverBed) and deepTools (multiBigwigSummary, computeMatrix, bigwigCompare). Covers the central trap that a wide query returns a precomputed zoom-level summary (by default the mean, which annihilates narrow peaks) not per-base data, when exact=True/values() is mandatory, the NaN-not-zero gap-handling fork, choosing mean vs max vs sum vs coverage by biological question, and the sorted-bedGraph plus chrom.sizes build requirement. Use when extracting signal at regions, computing mean signal per gene/peak, building a browser track from bedGraph, comparing tracks, or building TSS/gene-body metaprofiles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare gene co-expression and regulatory networks between biological conditions to find rewired relationships using DiffCorr, DiffCoEx, DINGO/iDINGO, and CoDiNA. Covers the differential-connectivity-is-not-differential-expression distinction, the pairwise multiple-testing explosion, marginal vs partial (direct) rewiring, and the underpowered-rewiring failure mode. Use when comparing co-expression networks between disease vs control, treatment, or developmental stages, or finding hub genes that rewire without changing mean expression. For single-condition modules see coexpression-networks; for differential expression of means see differential-expression/de-results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。