2,700 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Measure and improve Abridge workflow latency and friction using privacy-safe health-system evidence. Use when clinicians report slow capture, note readiness, review, or EHR handoff. Trigger with "measure Abridge performance".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Instrument Adobe integrations with redacted structured logs, request/job/activation correlation, service-level indicators, alerts, and evidence retention. Use when the task requires adobe content-safe observability. Trigger with "monitor Adobe API", "Adobe observability", or "App Builder logs".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define a production Adobe architecture spanning identity, service adapters, async workers, asset custody, I/O Events, App Builder, evidence, and recovery. Use when the task requires adobe integration reference architecture. Trigger with "design Adobe architecture", "Adobe reference architecture", or "standardize Adobe services".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Separate Adobe development, stage, and production organizations/projects/workspaces, credentials, profiles, storage, events, budgets, and evidence. Use when the task requires adobe multi-environment isolation. Trigger with "Adobe environments", "separate Adobe staging", or "Adobe workspace setup".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage, contain, recover, and review Adobe auth, product, async-job, event, storage, spend, or App Builder incidents with evidence. Use when the task requires adobe integration incident command. Trigger with "Adobe incident", "Firefly outage", or "Adobe credential leak".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Issue an evidence-backed production decision across Adobe auth, entitlements, API versions, data custody, async reliability, spend, observability, and rollback. Use before launch or a material integration change. Use when the task requires adobe production readiness decision. Trigger with "Adobe production checklist", "approve Adobe launch", or "Adobe go-live review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Org-grade attack-surface mapping: given a company's legal identity, discover its ENTIRE owned internet footprint — corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets — with attribution discipline, not just DNS breadth. The org-first attribution pyramid (legal entity -> LEI/registration -> corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets). Corporate-identity resolution via the GLEIF LEI API (legal name -> LEI, exact-LEI direct-children expansion, downward-only depth-capped BFS, NEVER a name re-resolution), SEC-EDGAR full-text search + Exhibit-21 subsidiary entity names, OpenCorporates entity corroboration, Wikidata SPARQL corporate graph (P856/P355/P749/P1830). Domain attribution via reverse-WHOIS (WhoisXML preview-then-purchase quota guard, SecurityTrails associated-domains — both paid), crt.sh O= certificate-transparency organization pivot (keyless), infrastructure correlation (shared NS/MX/SaaS-TXT, netblock membership, reverse-DNS PTR), and the independent-evidence combiner (1-prod(1-w_i), rule of three, OwnerTier NONE/WEAK/MODERATE/STRONG/CONFIRMED) — discover-only `related:` candidates are NEVER auto-scanned. Netblock/ASN attribution via org-first RIR queries (ARIN Whois-RWS org-handle search, RIPE DB organisation + inverse-org search) that recover 'dark netblocks' with no DNS link to the seed, ASN discovery (RIPEstat + BGPView union), the HYPERSCALER-SCOPE GUARD (never attribute a whole AWS/GCP/Azure/Cloudflare announced range to a tenant — keep only the seed-containing block, tag shared_hosting_cdn), and org-identity-seeded internet-scan-index queries (Shodan/Censys/ZoomEye/FOFA/BinaryEdge org: filters + an always-on keyless crt.sh fallback). Promote-to-scan triage ranks forgotten discover-only netblocks by remote-access exposure (gateway-vendor/KEV/control-plane/datastore port scoring) into an operator queue. Attribution confidence rubric + anti-patterns (namesake grafting via GLEIF name re-resolution, single-signal ownership, hyperscaler over-attribution, privacy-WHOIS pivot poisoning, RIR org-name collisions). Passive/keyless-first OSINT only — every paid-key dependency is enrichment on top of a keyless core, never a hard requirement. Use when mapping an organization's full corporate-family internet footprint, resolving a legal entity to its LEI/subsidiaries, discovering domains/netblocks/ASNs an org owns beyond its one seed domain, auditing M&A/shadow-IT sprawl, or scoping an engagement that starts from a company NAME rather than a domain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Geolocate or chronolocate a photo with tool-verified reasoning (where was this taken / when was it taken / photo geolocation / geo-guessing). Given one or more photos, intake.py does metadata, OCR and reverse image search (Baidu/Yandex) in one command; clues and candidates go on a candidate board (board.py) that ranks them and gives the next step; clues.py looks up calling codes, driving side, plates and area codes from region packs; for satellite and street view the machine ranks first and you look only at the top few (CLIP in sat_scan.py, DINOv2+SIFT in match.py); plus sun and shadow math, OSM Overpass and DEM skylines. Every conclusion is checked against real data; output is coordinates + error radius, evidence images and tiered confidence. Use when the user shares a photo and asks where was this taken / geolocate this / when was this taken / 这是哪 / 在哪拍的 / 帮我定位这张照片 / 网络迷踪 / 图寻 / 几点拍的.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clicks through every flow of an app clone and tests it for bugs: a test plan generated from the recon flows with happy paths and edge cases, Playwright end-to-end tests where possible, a browser click-through where not, and bug reports in a fixed format with severity, steps and evidence. Use when the user says "test my clone", "find bugs", "QA this", "click through everything", "write e2e tests", "does it work", or after /replica-build or /replica-backend.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Parallel CLI for web search, URL extraction, deep research, structured data enrichment, entity discovery, and recurring web monitoring. Best for requests that explicitly need current web evidence, academic-source discovery, repeated entity lookups, exhaustive reports, or ongoing change tracking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Formulate evidence-bounded scientific questions, candidate hypotheses, rival explanations, causal or associational claims, discriminating predictions, measurements, and preregistration-ready analysis plans. Use when turning observations or preliminary findings into transparent, testable research plans without treating hypotheses as facts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft, revise, and audit scientific manuscripts or reports with explicit evidence provenance, reporting-guideline coverage, authorship accountability, confidentiality controls, and local consistency checks. Use for manuscript sections, references, declarations, tables, figures, or submission preparation when scientific accuracy and traceability matter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare and validate research-only clinical decision-support evaluation, evidence-profile, cohort, survival, biomarker/model, privacy, and governance artifacts. Use for aggregate or synthetic research documentation and traceability—not patient care or live clinical operation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provide qualitative-first, evidence-traceable developmental review of scholarly works and audit low-stakes research-assessment rubrics with optional local quality controls. Never use for ranking people or consequential decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit websites and landing pages for conversion issues and design evidence-based A/B tests. Use when the user mentions "landing page isnt converting", "conversion rate", "A/B test", "why visitors leave", "objection handling", "bounce rate", "conversion funnel", "increase signups", or "people add to cart but dont buy". Also trigger when diagnosing why signups are low, designing experiment hypotheses, or auditing checkout flows for friction points. Covers funnel mapping, persuasion assets, and objection/counter-objection frameworks. For overall marketing strategy, see one-page-marketing. For usability issues, see ux-heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guided journey from a live website that underperforms to a prioritized, evidence-backed backlog of conversion, usability, message, and speed fixes - each shipped as a testable experiment. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - cro-methodology, ux-heuristics, refactoring-ui, web-typography, storybrand-messaging, high-perf-browser, made-to-stick, design-everyday-things - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (WEBSITE.md, DESIGN.md, IMPROVE-WEBSITE-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to fix a landing page that isn't converting, diagnose why visitors leave, audit for clarity and usability, or says 'the homepage feels off but a redesign didn't help'. No site yet, create-website; converts but needs traffic, grow-website; if the friction is in a product app, not the marketing site, improve-app; if one specific flow leaks, conversion-optimization. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translate existing blog posts into one or more target languages with SEO-optimized localization. Produces native-quality translations that preserve markdown structure, frontmatter, schema JSON-LD, image and chart embeds, and evidence-backed explanations. Localizes keywords, meta tags, numbers, dates, currencies, and quote styles per locale. Flags machine-translation artifacts for review. Run BEFORE blog-localize: this handles language conversion; localize handles cultural adaptation after translation completes. Use when user says "translate blog", "blog translate", "uebersetzen", "traduire", "traducir", "translate post", "blog auf Deutsch", "blog en espanol".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cut an imported livestream recording of any genre into evidence-backed, platform-ready clips by combining transcript, visual, audio, interaction, and domain-specific signals. Use for commerce, gaming, talk, interview, education, entertainment, sports, music, IRL, creative, news, or mixed livestream recordings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end orchestrated workflow that runs a task the way Fable ran sessions - parallel evidence subagents, one committed plan, surgical execution with an intent gate, adversarial verification agents, honest outcome-first report. Use for non-trivial multi-step tasks when the user says "/fable-loop", "run the fable loop", or "do this the way Fable would". For the rules alone without orchestration, use fable-method; for large multi-phase projects, prefer the GSD workflow and use this inside phases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A step-by-step problem-solving loop (classify the ask, define done, gather evidence, decide, act surgically, verify by observation, report outcome-first). Use when the user says "/fable-method", "use the fable method", or "approach this like Fable", or proactively when starting any multi-step task that no task-specific skill covers. Subcommands - plan (stop after the plan), audit (grade finished work against the loop), report (rewrite an answer outcome-first).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial verification of finished work. Treats any "done" as a set of claims, then re-runs the claimed verifications, diffs what actually changed, detects weakened tests and false completion claims, and delivers an evidence-based verdict (VERIFIED / VERIFIED WITH CAVEATS / REFUTED). Use after any agent or model claims work is complete - "/fable-judge", "judge this work", "verify what it did", "did that actually work?". Also runs the fable-method trap suite against a skill or model via "/fable-judge suite TARGET".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and use a persistent, citation-traceable knowledge wiki from documents, research papers, notes, or project documentation. Use for llmwiki projects, retrieving reusable evidence for an agent task, or compiling a corpus for repeated questions. A one-off file read or live web search does not need a wiki.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks about Ni Haisha / 倪海厦 TCM course material, especially Shang Han Lun / 伤寒论, Jingui / 金匮要略, Zhongjing Xinfa / 仲景心法, clinical cases / 临床案例 / 倪师医案, Bagang Bianzheng / 八纲辨证, Fuyang Forum / 扶阳论坛, Yijinjing / 易筋经, Liang Dong dialogue / 梁冬对话倪师, Stanford lecture / 斯坦福大学演讲, Tianji / 天纪 / 易经 / 阳宅 / 紫微斗数, Huangdi Neijing / 黄帝内经, Shennong Bencao / 神农本草, acupuncture / 针灸, meridians, acupoints, acupuncture depth safety / 危险进针深度 / 气胸风险, six-channel pattern identification, symptom-to-formula routing, formula comparison, lesson review, board/PPT screenshot evidence, or course-derived study notes. This skill is for educational distillation and study support only, not medical diagnosis, prescriptions, dosage, individualized treatment, or self-administered acupuncture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。