「gap」の検索結果

Fires after fixing any non-trivial bug or regression. Asks: could the graph have caught this as a guarantee? Pairs with reflection-in-and-on-action — picks up after "earliest catchable signal" and asks the next question: was that signal expressible in graph? Triggers: (1) after any non-trivial bug fix is verified working, (2) after a regression report (something used to work, broke), (3) during step 6 (knowledge extraction) of the workflow, (4) when reflection-on-action surfaces a "would have been catchable" signal. Outcome is a triage decision (graph-reachable? rule expressible? rule sound?) and either a draft Linear issue + guarantee proposal, or a recorded "graph capability gap" note. Never auto-creates guarantees.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify task completion by demonstrating real value: run the new code on real data, show visible results, find gaps between plan and reality. Not about tests/builds — about proving the feature WORKS end-to-end.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic methodology for achieving 100% backward dataflow reachability in a new language. Create gauntlet fixture, write trace, diagnose gaps, fix analyzer/algorithm, iterate to 100%. Language-agnostic process. Use when: (1) adding a new language to Grafema, (2) auditing dataflow coverage for existing language, (3) user says "/dataflow-gauntlet".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Codex Optimized Development, Evaluation, and Remediation (CODER) Loop with an orchestration-only coordinator, non-overlapping task-family owners, fresh independent reviewers, evidence-scoped remediation, and final coordinator acceptance. Discover and compose optional MSW, Timebox, MSL, and Codex Voice Optimizer companions as the Slopware Dev Stack without making them dependencies. Use in Codex when the user invokes the CODER Loop, asks to divide a complex change into bounded implementation families with independent reviewers, requests multi-agent implementation without overlapping ownership, requires review and repair until every blocking gap is independently rechecked, asks for the CODER tutorial or Slopware Dev Stack, or wants CODER to install or use its companions. Do not trigger for an ordinary single-agent change, a review-only request, or a non-Codex host.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refine an existing implementation plan with a second iteration. Re-analyzes the codebase for gaps, missing tasks, and wrong dependencies. Use after /aif-plan or to improve an /aif-fix plan. Optional +check flag validates refinements via a fresh-context subagent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refine an existing implementation plan with a second iteration. Re-analyzes the codebase for gaps, missing tasks, and wrong dependencies. Use after $aif-plan or to improve an $aif-fix plan. Optional +check flag validates refinements via a fresh-context subagent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Top 5 local competitor analysis — menu, pricing, review, social, and SEO comparison with positioning gap identification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Ascend NPU schedule, operator dispatch, operator launch, and Host Bound profiling issues in Ascend profiling data. Use when need to diagnose device Free time, framework/operator dispatch latency, launch latency, PYTORCH_API/CANN_API launch gaps, aclrtSynchronizeStream stalls, task queue behavior, CPU scheduling interference, GC/lock pauses, CPU affinity, or schedule-side optimization actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect every external account NowStack Mobile needs (Convex, Expo/EAS, Apple Developer, Vercel, Stripe, Google Play) by acquiring PROGRAMMATIC API ACCESS for each, then doing everything automatically through that access. Use for "setup accounts", "connect my accounts", first-run onboarding, or when check-setup reports CLI/auth gaps. The skill obtains a token/key per service, stores it in the right place, and only asks the user for the irreducible manual steps (browser signup, 2FA, one-time key download). Every account is skippable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create high-quality, SEO-optimized content that ranks AND reads like a human wrote it. Performs live SERP gap analysis, writes with anti-AI detection techniques, and adds schema markup. Use when someone needs a blog post, article, SEO page, or wants content that drives search traffic. Triggers on 'SEO content', 'blog post', 'article', 'SERP', 'programmatic SEO', 'content at scale', 'template pages at scale', 'write a post about', 'rank for', or 'search-optimized content'. Two modes: single article or programmatic SEO at scale. Owns programmatic SEO and content-at-scale generation. For a single alternatives or vs/comparison page, see /competitor-alternatives; for a multi-phase page roadmap with a persistent tracker, see /seo-machine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep-dive ONE competitor's organic footprint — exact ranking keywords and URLs, content themes, backlink profile, and exploitable gaps — with findings written into brand/competitors.md. Use this skill when the user names a competitor and wants to know what to learn from them, counter, or outrank, including head-to-head comparisons against the user's own domain. For market-level mapping first, use openseo-competitive-landscape. Triggers: "analyze competitor", "competitor keywords", "competitor backlinks", "beat <competitor>", "competitor seo teardown".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map who is winning an SEO market with measured data — recurring SERP domains, organic footprints, winning content themes, backlink authority, and the gaps worth attacking. Use this skill for market-level questions ("who ranks for X", "how competitive is this space", "where are the SEO openings") before committing to keyword targets or content themes. For one named competitor, use openseo-competitor-analysis instead. Triggers: "competitive landscape seo", "who ranks for", "seo market map", "how competitive is", "serp competitors".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enhance an existing marketing plan with parallel research. Use when the agent has a draft plan (brand strategy, campaign brief, content calendar, launch plan) that needs strengthening with real data. Triggers on 'deepen this plan', 'strengthen this strategy', 'research gaps in my plan', 'make this plan better', 'this plan is too surface level', 'add research to this', 'validate this plan', 'back this up with data', or when a plan exists but lacks audience data, competitive positioning, or keyword strategy. Make sure to use this whenever someone has an EXISTING plan that feels thin or unresearched — even if they just say 'is this plan good enough?' or 'what's missing here?', they likely need deepening. This skill ENHANCES existing plans — it does not create new ones. If no plan exists, route to /brainstorm or /launch-strategy first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Batch Resume Screening — score and rank candidates 0-100 against job requirements, flag red flags (job hopping, gaps, skill mismatches), output Pass/Phone Screen/Skip recommendation per candidate

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when scoring finished content against quality dimensions, evaluating whether a piece meets publishable standards, or determining which workflow phase needs rework based on quality gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when ingesting source material for a writing project, building a knowledge map from notes and documents, identifying research gaps, or preparing a research corpus for content creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when analyzing an existing TypeScript or JavaScript codebase to decide where and how to introduce Inngest. Covers repository discovery, framework and package detection, finding durability gaps in HTTP handlers, webhooks, cron jobs, queues, long-running jobs, AI agents, Agent Evals, polling loops, eval loops, and side-effect-heavy code, then producing and implementing an incremental integration plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit an existing Quarkus + LangChain4j project against this stack's agentic conventions — a read-only conformance or gap-analysis review. Use when the user asks to audit, review, check, assess, or validate a Quarkus project against the LangChain4j agentic conventions, or wants to know whether an existing project conforms to (or is ready to adopt) this stack. User-invoked only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evidence needs grading before anyone reasons from it — the user asks "how reliable is this?", "grade this source", "check this report", "can I trust this article?", "is this corroborated?", or hands over a URL, a pasted report or a Liberty91 event ahead of an ACH or assessment. The Quality of Information Check from the CIA Tradecraft Primer, adapted for vendor and press CTI reporting. Resolves each document to its originating source, splits it into claims, and grades every claim on two written elements, access level (how the source knows) and claim support (what backs the statement), with a stated rationale, using a fixed rubric with hard caps. The grade is not an Admiralty rating. Five outlets citing one vendor report count as one source; anything that cannot be traced to a primary is capped, not guessed. Returns a graded claim table, gaps, a deception screen and JSON. /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments run it first by default.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to build or update a threat-actor profile, "tell me about actor X" / "profile actor Y", or another skill needs the canonical profile template (attribution, TTPs, campaigns, infrastructure patterns, intelligence gaps).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

识别和管理 Loop 系统的认知风险: 自动化程度越高,你真正理解的部分越少。 当用户发现"仓库里有很多代码但我看不懂"、"loop 产出很多但不确定对不对"、或需要向团队警示 AI 使用风险时使用。 不适用于: 纯技术调试、或产出完全可客观验证的场景。 关键 trigger: "AI 生成的代码我看不懂"、"产出太多理解不过来"、"AI 使用风险"。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting a new feature, product, or system design. Eliminates the spec-implementation gap by making specifications the primary artifact that drives code generation. Keywords: SDD, spec-driven, PRD, feature spec, user stories, implementation plan, specification, acceptance criteria, Given-When-Then.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route Maestro issue-to-task-to-PR work through Orchestra's configured GitHub, Linear, Jira, or Azure DevOps integration and report connection and workflow gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Digital Garden & Visual Architect. Use this agent to manage the Obsidian Knowledge Base, create visual logic maps via JSON Canvas, and maintain the automated development journal. It bridges the gap between abstract ideas and structured documentation. When the host supports them, use the Obsidian-focused skills and integrations for CLI, Bases, Markdown, Canvas, and defuddling workflows. When the host supports them, use the Obsidian-focused skills and integrations for CLI, Bases, Markdown, Canvas, and defuddling workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。