「ida」の検索結果

Use when the user asks to "pick a launch date", "plan the launch window", or "set the embargo and lift time"; produces a candidate-window comparison table (conflict / tailwind / risk per window) built from industry-event cycles and the competitor launch calendar, a launch-week vs rolling-release format call, store-review buffer padding (labeled Estimated), and an embargo window definition (lift moment + timezone) submitted to the launch registry as a candidate. Not for judging the cultural moment itself — use trend-spotter; not for launch-day execution — use launch-day-conductor. 发布择时/发布窗口/竞品日历/禁运期窗口/审核缓冲

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Best-practice authoring guidance AND a read-only policy gate for AWS Terraform generated by a migration skill. Load during any phase that writes a terraform/ directory — first as the "what to emit" posture rules + security-baseline spec, then after writing as the deterministic policy verdict. Read-only: it reports whether the generated Terraform passes; it never edits .tf files, never touches .phase-status.json, and never decides phase completion. Complements (does not replace) terraform fmt/init/validate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when preparing your agent for production — IAM scoping, inbound auth (JWT, SigV4), secrets management, cold start optimization, session lifecycle, rate limiting, input validation, and quota guidance. Triggers on: "production checklist", "harden agent", "production ready", "secure agent", "inbound auth", "going live", "cold start optimization", "session lifecycle", "StopRuntimeSession", "quota", "throttling", "maxVms", "rate limit", "security audit of outbound API calls", "gateway target audit for production", "restrict who can call", "lock down endpoint", "only our app can call". Not for Cedar tool-restriction policies — use agents-connect. Not for quality measurement — use agents-optimize. Not for outbound credential storage or API key wiring — use agents-connect. Not for A2A agent-to-agent auth — use agents-build. Cold start observation and diagnosis (not optimization) routes to agents-debug.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establishes VPC peering connections between two VPCs for direct private network connectivity. Always use this skill when creating or managing VPC peering — it validates CIDR overlap, updates all route tables in both VPCs, configures DNS resolution, and provides security group guidance that are critical for correct connectivity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the end-to-end AWS resilience lifecycle integrating Resilience Hub v2, Fault Injection Service, and Application Recovery Controller. Covers the Define → Test → Operate workflow: from policy creation through failure mode assessment, to FIS experiment validation, to ARC operational controls. Applicable when the user wants a complete resilience strategy, needs to connect findings to experiments to controls, or is planning a resilience program. Also applicable for the meta question of whether marking NGRH findings as resolved is enough, whether they are "done" after resolving findings, or how to validate findings before resolving them. Not applicable for resolving or remediating a specific individual finding (see resilience-hub-failure-mode-assessment), or when a single service is explicitly named (e.g. "what FIS experiment should I run").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Anthropic Claude API security best practices for key management, input validation, and prompt injection defense. Use when securing API keys, validating user inputs before sending to Claude, or implementing content safety guardrails. Trigger with phrases like "anthropic security", "claude api key security", "secure anthropic", "prompt injection defense".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement content policy guardrails, input/output validation, and usage governance for Claude API integrations. Trigger with phrases like "anthropic guardrails", "claude content policy", "claude input validation", "anthropic safety rules".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Org-grade attack-surface mapping: given a company's legal identity, discover its ENTIRE owned internet footprint — corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets — with attribution discipline, not just DNS breadth. The org-first attribution pyramid (legal entity -> LEI/registration -> corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets). Corporate-identity resolution via the GLEIF LEI API (legal name -> LEI, exact-LEI direct-children expansion, downward-only depth-capped BFS, NEVER a name re-resolution), SEC-EDGAR full-text search + Exhibit-21 subsidiary entity names, OpenCorporates entity corroboration, Wikidata SPARQL corporate graph (P856/P355/P749/P1830). Domain attribution via reverse-WHOIS (WhoisXML preview-then-purchase quota guard, SecurityTrails associated-domains — both paid), crt.sh O= certificate-transparency organization pivot (keyless), infrastructure correlation (shared NS/MX/SaaS-TXT, netblock membership, reverse-DNS PTR), and the independent-evidence combiner (1-prod(1-w_i), rule of three, OwnerTier NONE/WEAK/MODERATE/STRONG/CONFIRMED) — discover-only `related:` candidates are NEVER auto-scanned. Netblock/ASN attribution via org-first RIR queries (ARIN Whois-RWS org-handle search, RIPE DB organisation + inverse-org search) that recover 'dark netblocks' with no DNS link to the seed, ASN discovery (RIPEstat + BGPView union), the HYPERSCALER-SCOPE GUARD (never attribute a whole AWS/GCP/Azure/Cloudflare announced range to a tenant — keep only the seed-containing block, tag shared_hosting_cdn), and org-identity-seeded internet-scan-index queries (Shodan/Censys/ZoomEye/FOFA/BinaryEdge org: filters + an always-on keyless crt.sh fallback). Promote-to-scan triage ranks forgotten discover-only netblocks by remote-access exposure (gateway-vendor/KEV/control-plane/datastore port scoring) into an operator queue. Attribution confidence rubric + anti-patterns (namesake grafting via GLEIF name re-resolution, single-signal ownership, hyperscaler over-attribution, privacy-WHOIS pivot poisoning, RIR org-name collisions). Passive/keyless-first OSINT only — every paid-key dependency is enrichment on top of a keyless core, never a hard requirement. Use when mapping an organization's full corporate-family internet footprint, resolving a legal entity to its LEI/subsidiaries, discovering domains/netblocks/ASNs an org owns beyond its one seed domain, auditing M&A/shadow-IT sprawl, or scoping an engagement that starts from a company NAME rather than a domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, validate, and run the claude-osint skills repo — check SKILL.md frontmatter, run the secret_scan.py and h1_reference.py helpers, run sync-skill-content.sh, run the smoke test. Use when asked to run, build, test, validate, or smoke-test claude-osint or its OSINT skills/scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update website docs to match recent code changes, cross-validating every flag against source. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: update documentation, sync docs with code, document a new flag or command, fix stale docs, or update the README. This skill covers all website/docs/ categories (commands, reference, understand, how-to, troubleshooting, getting-started) plus the built-in skill description and README. If you just implemented a feature and need to update docs, this is the skill to use. Never manually edit website docs without cross-validating flags against Go source first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run isolated E2E tests in devcontainer from ai_docs/tests runbooks. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: run an E2E test, execute a test runbook, validate a feature end-to-end, create a new runbook, or test CLI behavior in isolation. If you need to run a multi-step CLI validation sequence (init → install → sync → verify), this is the skill — it handles ssenv isolation, flag verification, and structured reporting. Prefer this over ad-hoc docker exec sequences for any test that follows a runbook or needs reproducible isolation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug-fix discipline — every defect has an etiology, the chain of cause that produced the observable fault; trace it before patching. Errors only grow: a bandaid leaks unless genuinely localized and leak-free. Walk the diagnostic ladder (presentation → proximate cause → API contract → isolated or systemic) before writing the fix. Use when authoring or reviewing any bug fix, regression patch, "quick fix" PR, or when deciding whether to ship, defer, or refactor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish what is actually true and current for the surface you are about to change — not just search. Grounding = locate the authoritative source and reconcile sources that disagree (code vs doc, migration vs schema, memory vs current code, live vs archived), not take the first hit. Use before any grep/find/explore of the codebase or docs, when deciding which of several definitions is the real one, or when a doc or memory conflicts with the code. Covers the source-of-truth hierarchy, reconciliation discipline, scoped ripgrep, and the docs/tags.yml + docsearch.py index.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discipline for the seam between two SDKs (or two sides of one contract) that the same hand writes. The failure mode: "we own both sides" produces dirty contracts no foreign reviewer would accept. The exercise: pretend the other side is FFI, IPC, or a network protocol you cannot rewrite. Spawn an adversarial subagent profiled as the producer's maintainer; negotiate the change as a feature request, not a PR. Companion to $sdk-design. Language-agnostic — applies to a TS package + its consumer, a Rust crate + its WASM binding, two services sharing a wire format, or any other boundary the same author writes both ends of.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Role profile — a reviewer who is fact-seeking, bedrock-seeking, honest, and rejecting. Demands that arguments rest on small facts that cannot be wrong (not on stacked assumptions dressed up as foundation), and that deliberately-unclear concepts be quarantined — never leaked into solid layers, never mixed with each other. Catches the failure mode where designs ship after partial grounding: most of the spec researched, the design feels finished, and the unresearched remainder holds the deal-breaker. Invoke with `/pedantic <target>` (e.g. `/pedantic review this design doc`, `/pedantic review the SDK design`, `/pedantic review this PR`). Probes cover logical structure (definitions, assumptions, boundaries, contradictions, unfalsifiability, vague quantifiers, counterexamples), epistemic honesty (researchable vs. discoverable-only-by-doing), bedrock integrity (assumed-bedrock, leaked uncertainty, mixed unclarity), and design pathology (YAGNI, wrong-layer abstraction, unclear responsibility, fragmentation, over-engineering). Use when you want a hard critique of a plan, design doc, technical doc, code change, or PR description — not a copy edit, not a vibe check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write any link or URL so it resolves where it is rendered, not where it lives in the repo. Use when authoring or editing a link — in docs, source docstrings, READMEs (incl. npm-published), or product UI: docs cross-refs, "see SECURITY.md", universal `/_/` routes, GitHub URLs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide which family a doc belongs to before drafting — SDK/developer, user/product, or working-group (WG) — since family sets the audience, home, and tone. Use when creating, moving, or restructuring docs, when unsure which directory a doc belongs in, or when a request says "document this" / "write docs for X" without naming the kind. Routes to the specialized skill for each family.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query images with a local Ollama vision model without loading the image into the main agent context. Use when you need to describe a screenshot, check whether rendered content is present, detect overlapping elements, or ask any visual question about a PNG/JPEG/WebP file. Requires Ollama running locally with the Gemma 4 multimodal model (`gemma4` on Ollama). Script: .agents/skills/vision/scripts/ask.py. Trigger phrases: "describe image", "what does this screenshot show", "does the canvas contain content", "check screenshot visually", "look at this image", "any overlapping elements", "vision query".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides authoring, organizing, and referencing test fixtures in this repo. Use when creating new fixtures, writing tests that depend on fixtures, or deciding what should be checked into git. Engine fixtures (rendering corpora) live in the engine repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research, compare, and update shared AI model JSON for TypeScript, web, and Rust consumers. Covers text model tiers, image and video generation models, image tool models, release provenance, pricing data sourcing, and product-side catalogue cost estimates. Use when bumping model versions, adding new models, updating pricing, or auditing model specs against provider documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Doctrine for drafting and keeping working-group docs under `docs/wg/**` — RFC/RFD specs and findings/research/glossary. A WG doc is a language-agnostic, code-agnostic study of a domain: it argues *why* and defines *what*, never *how in our code*. Use when writing or editing anything under `docs/wg/`, an RFC/RFD, a spec, a design note, a glossary, or research findings — including "write up the design", "document the spec", or "capture what we learned". Not for plans/TODOs (untracked `*.plan.md`), user docs, or SDK API refs — use `docs` to route those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate a filename extension without opening any filesystem path

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build slide decks and presentations for research talks. Use this for making PowerPoint slides, conference presentations, seminar talks, research presentations, thesis defense slides, or any scientific talk. Provides slide structure, design templates, timing guidance, and visual validation. Works with PowerPoint and LaTeX Beamer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design MVPs, validated learning experiments, and pivot-or-persevere decisions using Build-Measure-Learn. Use when the user mentions "MVP scope", "validated learning", "pivot or persevere", "vanity metrics", "test assumptions", "innovation accounting", "build-measure-learn", "minimum viable experiment", "should we pivot", "test a business idea cheaply", or "build the smallest version first". Also trigger when deciding what to include in a first version, measuring startup progress, or evaluating whether to change direction on a product bet. Covers innovation accounting and actionable metrics. For 5-day prototype testing, see design-sprint. For customer motivation analysis, see jobs-to-be-done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。