「implementation」の検索結果

Reactive streams and event-driven programming in Golang using samber/ro — ReactiveX implementation with 150+ type-safe operators, cold/hot observables, 5 subject types (Publish, Behavior, Replay, Async, Unicast), declarative pipelines via Pipe, 40+ plugins (HTTP, cron, fsnotify, JSON, logging), automatic backpressure, error propagation, and Go context integration. Apply when using or adopting samber/ro, when the codebase imports github.com/samber/ro, or when building asynchronous event-driven pipelines, real-time data processing, streams, or reactive architectures in Go. Not for finite slice transforms (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-lo` skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Go (Golang) naming conventions — covers packages, constructors, structs, interfaces, constants, enums, errors, booleans, receivers, getters/setters, functional options, acronyms, test functions, and subtest names. Use this skill when writing new Go code, reviewing or refactoring, choosing between naming alternatives (New vs NewTypeName, isConnected vs connected, ErrNotFound vs NotFoundError, StatusReady vs StatusUnknown at iota 0), debating Go package names (utils/helpers anti-patterns), or asking about Go naming best practices. Also trigger when the user mentions MixedCaps vs snake_case, ALL_CAPS constants, Get-prefix on getters, or error string casing. Do NOT use for general Go implementation questions that don't involve naming decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Golang semantic code intelligence via `gopls`, the official Go language server — go-to-definition, find references, call/implementation hierarchy, workspace symbol search, package API discovery, diagnostics, safe rename, refactors (extract/inline/fill/rewrite code actions), formatting, and generated tests. Reaches an agent via gopls's own MCP server (`go_*` tools), Claude Code's native `LSP` tool, or the `gopls` CLI. Use when navigating or refactoring Go code — jumping to a definition, finding call sites before a rename, understanding a file's or package's dependencies, running diagnostics after an edit, or extracting/inlining/renaming. Not for the published ecosystem — packages not in your `go.mod`, versions, licenses, importers — → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev` skill (`godig`). Not for a whole-tree vulnerability audit → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-security` skill (`govulncheck`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides reverse engineering techniques for CTF challenges. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, game clients, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic. Do not use it when the vulnerability is already understood and the remaining task is exploitation; use pwn instead. Do not use it for pure web workflows, log or disk forensics, or standalone crypto problems unless reversing the implementation is the real blocker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Current technical or business fact to cite from web: web lookup lane - settle a current-facts question in one cited retrieval round with retrieval dates and source-quality notes; for pre-spec grounding across reference implementations use `research`. Use when the user says: web-research, web research, web search, search the web, internet search, look up, look up sources, latest sources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Deep dive before a decision: deep research engine - grounding for specs and decisions: study open-source reference implementations with pinned refs, gather live web evidence with citation discipline, verify contested claims, and distill a decision-grounding dossier that planning consumes; for a decision brief use research-brief, for upstream guidance use web-research. Use when the user says: research plan, literature review, research literature, review recent papers, deep research, deep-research, exhaustive research, saturation research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Software feature or bugfix not yet planned: structured planning before execution. Use when the user says: plan, implementation plan, make a plan, write a plan, write the plan, task breakdown, safe feature, safely add a feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Designing an API, server, or data-layer change: prepare server, API, and data-layer contracts — auth boundary, error paths, response shape, and schema/migration discipline — before implementation. Use when the user says: backend, back-end, back end, backend skill, server side, server-side, api design, api contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - ensures an isolated workspace exists via native tools or git worktree fallback

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comet Phase 4: Verify and Close. Invoke with /comet-verify. Verify implementation matches design, handle development branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manually review the implementation diff for the current Comet change. Report correctness, security, and edge-case issues without advancing the workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comet Phase 3: Plan and Build. Invoke with /comet-build. Create plans and select execution method (subagent or direct) for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates structured .code-task.md files from descriptions or PDD implementation plans. Auto-detects input type, creates properly formatted tasks with Given-When-Then acceptance criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transforms a rough idea into a detailed design document with implementation plan. Follows Prompt-Driven Development — iterative requirements clarification, research, design, and planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。