「make」の検索結果

Generate meaning-carrying editorial data-illustrations in the monotykamary / Linear aesthetic (near-black grayscale, Inter display + mono labels, hairline framed figures) with a single coral accent. This is a GENERATIVE GUIDE, not a template gallery: it teaches the "claim -> geometry" method so any session can invent the RIGHT figure for what a post actually argues, then render it as a self-contained, theme-aware, reduced-motion-safe HTML/SVG figure. Use when writing/illustrating a blog post, essay, spec, or slide and you want a chart, diagram, or illustration that carries a thesis (not decoration) in the house style. Triggers: "make a chart/diagram/illustration for this", "visualize this argument", "monotykamary/Linear style figure", "editorial graphic".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the right way to represent a dataset so a reader gets the finding in three seconds — a catalog of 20+ chart and diagram forms with when-to-use and failure modes, plus the encoding decisions that make any of them readable (takeaway headline, direct labels, kill the axis, highlight-and-mute, show the caveat). Style-agnostic — use with whatever palette or design system the destination already has. Use when charting survey results, benchmark data, usage metrics, or research findings for a post, brief, deck, or report, and whenever the default bar chart feels like it's burying the point.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review generated or changed production code before it ships, using Clean Code, SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI, and LLM-specific failure-mode checks in any programming language. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, refactors, or fixes code, before presenting, committing, or merging the result. Use when the user asks "review this PR", "is this safe to merge?", "make this cleaner", "audit this code", "refactor this", "fix this bug", or after a coding agent produced implementation code. Can also guide writing when explicitly invoked before a risky edit. Invoke it on your own initiative the moment you finish writing, editing, or refactoring non-trivial production code, before presenting or committing — don't wait to be asked. DO NOT USE for factual/conceptual questions, CI/tooling config, git workflow, running/debugging tests, pure architecture discussion, prose writing, data analysis, or test-code review (use test-guard).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review generated or changed WordPress code — plugins, themes, and blocks — before it ships. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, or reviews code touching WordPress APIs: add_action/add_filter, shortcodes, meta boxes, AJAX handlers, REST routes, WP_Query or $wpdb, widgets, or WP-CLI commands. Use on 'review this plugin', 'is this safe to ship', 'make this translatable', 'speed up this query', or after tasks like 'write a plugin' or 'add an endpoint/shortcode/meta box'. Enforces escaping and sanitization, nonces plus capability checks, prepared database queries, core-API-first development, translation-ready strings, and query/caching discipline. DO NOT USE for WooCommerce-specific order, product, or checkout logic (use woo-guard), non-WordPress PHP, generic code quality review (use clean-code-guard), test code review (use test-guard), server or hosting configuration, or conceptual WordPress questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reproduce a red GitHub check and make it green. Use when the brief skill is fix-ci or the user wants a failing CI command to exit 0.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when packaging AISTATS code, data, proofs, simulation scripts, notebooks, random seeds, and logs as anonymous supplementary evidence or public post-acceptance artifacts, even when there is no separate artifact badge. Covers what statistically minded AISTATS reviewers inspect first and how to make Monte Carlo studies turnkey.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the question is what makes the result tight or what the data identify for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript — covering both (a) structural/empirical-IO and experimental identification and (b) for pure theory, which assumptions drive the result and how robust the mechanism is. Stress-tests credibility; it does not build the model (see aejmic-theory-model).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing and reporting the analysis for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — qualitative coding and data-to-theory construction, or quantitative estimation and robustness. Makes the evidence-to-theory link transparent; it does not design the study (see asq-methods).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when packaging ACM CCS artifacts for the artifact-evaluation committee and the ACM badges — Artifacts Available, Artifacts Evaluated Functional, Artifacts Evaluated Reusable, and Results Reproduced — covering what security evaluators inspect, how to make attacks and defenses turnkey, and how to justify withheld artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Book restaurant reservations via browser automation. Use when asked to make dinner reservations, book a table, or find availability at restaurants. Supports OpenTable, Resy, and direct restaurant booking sites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end outbound prospecting: detect intent signals, research companies, find decision-maker contacts, personalize messaging, launch campaign.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a prospect list of companies with decision makers, verified contact info, and hiring/intent signals. Use when asked to find leads by industry, build an account list with specific titles, prospect companies that are actively hiring, or create a targeted outreach list filtered by company size, location, and hiring activity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find decision-makers at a specific company using Apollo, Crustdata, Fiber, and PDL people search via Gooseworks MCP. Given a company name and target titles, returns a list of contacts with name, title, LinkedIn URL, and location.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants to curate the SATK library knowledge index for a Simulink project — mark commonly used blocks, correct auto-assigned block categories, or improve block descriptions so the model-building agent picks better blocks from custom libraries. Triggered by phrases like "mark blocks common", "improve block descriptions", "correct block category", "make the agent prefer certain blocks", and from Gate 3 of building-simulink-models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects cancer and infers tissue-of-origin from cfDNA methylation by choosing conversion chemistry (bisulfite vs EM-seq vs TAPS vs cfMeDIP), calling read-level methylation haplotypes rather than averaged beta values, and deconvolving a hematopoietic-dominated cfDNA mixture against a methylation atlas via NNLS/quadratic programming. Encodes the GRAIL/CCGA thesis that thousands of tissue-specific markers make methylation outperform sparse mutations for multi-cancer early detection (MCED) and localization, and that single concordantly-methylated fragments give ppm-level sensitivity. Uses MethylDackel for extraction (mbias-then-extract), MEDIPS/QSEA for enrichment data, scipy.optimize.nnls for deconvolution. Use when building an MCED or methylation-MRD assay, picking a conversion chemistry for low-input plasma, or deconvolving tissue-of-origin from cfDNA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts cfDNA fragmentomics features (DELFI genome-wide short/long ratios, WPS nucleosome positioning, Griffin GC-corrected accessibility profiles, end-motifs/MDS, OCF) for cancer detection and tissue-of-origin from plasma WGS. Centers on the nuclease-footprint reframe (every feature re-reads one nucleosome object), the mandatory GC correction, and the cross-protocol non-comparability that breaks naive classifiers. Runs FinaleToolkit (real CLI/Python, MIT) and the Griffin Snakemake pipeline; DELFI is a method, not a package. Use when deriving fragment-based signal from cfDNA, choosing a feature family for detection vs subtyping, or diagnosing why a fragmentomic model failed validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handles BED-format genomic intervals (BED3 through BED12, narrowPeak/broadPeak) and the coordinate-system substrate the whole interval category rests on, with bedtools (CLI) and pybedtools/pyranges/pandas (Python). Covers the 0-based half-open vs 1-based-closed convention boundary and the start-1/end-unchanged conversion, the silent failures (chrom-name mismatch, CRLF, lexicographic-vs-version sort under -sorted), genome/chrom.sizes generation, sorting contracts, BED12 block invariants, validation, makewindows, cross-assembly liftover (liftOver/CrossMap), and BED<->VCF/BAM/FASTA conversion. Use when reading, creating, validating, sorting, lifting between genome builds, or converting interval files, preparing inputs for bedtools/tabix/bigBed, or debugging an off-by-one or empty-overlap result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates, normalizes, and converts bedGraph signal tracks (4-column chrom/start/end/value, 0-based half-open) with bedtools genomecov, deepTools bamCoverage/bamCompare/bigwigCompare, bedtools unionbedg, and UCSC bedGraphToBigWig. Covers why a raw coverage bedGraph is not comparable across samples until normalized, the CPM/RPKM/BPM/RPGC normalization menu and the conserved-total assumption that makes them wrong under a global perturbation, the strict sorted-non-overlapping-chrom.sizes bedGraphToBigWig contract that silently corrupts a bigWig, effective-genome-size selection, and bin-size aliasing. Use when building or normalizing a coverage/signal track from a BAM, comparing tracks across samples or conditions, converting bedGraph to a browser-ready bigWig, or diagnosing a track that looks plausible but reports wrong heights.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build sequence logos from aligned DNA, RNA, or protein motifs using ggseqlogo (R), Logomaker (Python), or WebLogo with explicit bits vs probability encoding, background-frequency correction, custom alphabets, and multi-logo stacking. Use when visualizing motif PWMs (TF binding, splice sites, CRISPR spacers), aligned-position composition, or comparing two motif sets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build local BLAST databases and run searches using NCBI BLAST+ command-line tools. Use when running >50 queries, building custom databases with -parse_seqids and -taxid, downloading prebuilt NCBI databases via update_blastdb.pl, choosing -task variants (megablast/dc-megablast/blastn/blastn-short), tuning soft/hard masking, scaling threads, or extracting hits with blastdbcmd. Encodes BLAST v5 vs v4 database format, taxonomy filtering, makeblastdb pitfalls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconstruct ancestral states at internal phylogenetic nodes for sequences (PAML codeml, IQ-TREE --ancestral, GRASP, FastML), discrete traits (corHMM hidden-rate Markov, ape::ace, phytools::make.simmap stochastic mapping, BayesTraits), and continuous traits (phytools::fastAnc, geiger Brownian/OU, RPANDA). Use when designing constructs for ancestral protein resurrection, tracing trait evolution along a tree, performing stochastic character mapping, testing models of trait evolution (BM vs OU vs EB), inferring ancestral genome content via Dollo or DTL reconciliation, or quantifying ancestral-state uncertainty for downstream comparative analyses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects aberrant splicing in single rare-disease patients vs a control panel using FRASER 2.0 (Bioconductor; Beta-binomial autoencoder on Intron Jaccard Index, default delta cutoff 0.1, q hyperparameter), OUTRIDER (gene-level outlier expression via autoencoder denoising), LeafcutterMD (Dirichlet-multinomial outlier mode of LeafCutter for annotation-free junctions), and DROP (Snakemake pipeline integrating FRASER2 + OUTRIDER + monoallelic expression for clinical diagnostics). The statistical model is fundamentally different from differential splicing — single-sample-vs-cohort outlier detection rather than two-group comparison. Standard tool in EU rare-disease (Solve-RD) and NIH UDN programs. Use when applying RNA-seq to undiagnosed Mendelian disease, validating predicted splice variants in clinical samples, or detecting cryptic splicing in disease tissue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes code files and reports statistics including line counts, file counts by extension, and total size. Use this skill whenever the user wants to understand the composition of a codebase - asking about "how many lines of code", "what file types exist", "code distribution", or needing a quick audit of project size and structure. Make sure to invoke this skill when users mention analyzing codebases, counting lines, checking file distributions, or auditing code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to simplify Swift code, reduce boilerplate, or make Swift more readable and idiomatic without changing behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。