1,532 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Process external code review feedback with technical rigor. Use when receiving feedback from another LLM, human reviewer, or CI tool. Verifies claims before implementing, tracks disposition.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technische, inhaltliche und internationale SEO-Probleme für Deutschland und den DACH-Raum prüfen und priorisieren. Nutze diesen Skill bei Ranking- oder Trafficeinbrüchen, bei Problemen mit Crawling, Indexierung, Rendering, Canonicals, Weiterleitungen, Ladezeit, interner Verlinkung, hreflang oder lokaler Sichtbarkeit, vor und nach Migrationen und Relaunches, und wenn Befunde aus der Search Console eingeordnet werden sollen. Liefert reproduzierbare Evidenz statt Vermutungen, trennt Beobachtung von Hypothese und bleibt lesend: produktive Änderungen brauchen eine gesonderte Freigabe.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide a researcher step by step into an unfamiliar research field, or decode a paper, abstract, figure caption, or referee comment they cannot parse. Builds understanding in rungs (motivation, vocabulary, core framework, methods, frontier), anchored to what the user already knows, with a checkpoint before each advance. Use when the user says they are new to a field, asks what a research area or method is, says an explanation was too technical, asks to be walked through something step by step, asks for a reading path, or supplies dense research text. Trigger even when the user only names an unfamiliar field or pastes an abstract without asking to be taught. Do not trigger for a one-line summary, a short overview request, or a direct factual answer; do not use it for translation, editing, search, debugging, or specialist questions inside the user's own field. Also trigger in other languages, including Chinese such as 入门, 一步一步讲, 看不懂, 这篇论文讲什么, 帮我理解这个领域.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert 5-dimension design critique — philosophical, scored, actionable. Use when asked to "critique this design", "expert review", "score my design", "how does this look", "is this good design", "design feedback", or "review this UI". Different from /form-audit (which is technical QA for consistency/compliance) — form-critique evaluates design as a craft object: philosophy, hierarchy, execution, function, and innovation each scored 0–10 with a punch list. Add "as a report" or "give me a visual report" to produce an HTML file with SVG radar chart, evidence cards, and Keep/Fix/Quick-wins action lists — useful for design reviews and stakeholder presentations instead of CLI output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cold outbound sequence builder — produces multi-touch email + LinkedIn sequences (5-7 touchpoints) personalized by persona type (technical buyer, economic buyer, champion). Use when asked to "write cold emails", "build an outbound sequence", "create prospecting emails", "write my LinkedIn outreach", or "design a cold email campaign".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hacker News post crafter — given a product, feature, or story produces a ready-to-post HN submission (title ≤80 chars, no marketing), honest body text with technical depth, no outbound links, predicted reception analysis, and comment-response templates for likely pushback. Use when asked to "write an HN post", "craft a Show HN", "prepare our Hacker News launch", or "help me post on HN".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a polished HTML presentation page and Obsidian Canvas for big releases — new products, takeovers, major migrations. Non-technical audience. Use when asked to "present this", "release announcement", "show what we built", or "stakeholder update".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous orchestrator that scans, refactors, and eradicates technical debt at the end of the development lifecycle to achieve a Zero Debt codebase / Orkestrator otonom untuk menghapus utang teknis sebelum rilis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guide for technical documentation sites (Mintlify, Docusaurus, Storybook, VitePress) and component documentation / Panduan ahli situs dokumentasi teknis (Mintlify, Docusaurus, Storybook, VitePress) dan dokumentasi komponen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translation and interpretation as language meta-skills -- equivalence theory (Nida's formal vs. dynamic equivalence), translation strategies (borrowing, calque, transposition, modulation, adaptation), interpretation modes (simultaneous, consecutive, sight), source text analysis, register preservation, cultural adaptation, untranslatability and compensatory strategies, machine translation literacy, and back-translation for verification. Covers literary, technical, legal, and community interpreting contexts. Use when translating between languages, evaluating translation quality, teaching translation skills, or understanding the limits of cross-linguistic transfer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systems engineering covering requirements management, the V-model lifecycle, integration planning, verification and validation (V&V), interface control, trade studies, and the NASA Systems Engineering Handbook. Spans the full lifecycle from concept through operations and disposal. Includes requirements decomposition, traceability matrices, configuration management, and technical performance measures. Use when managing complex system development, writing requirements, planning integration, or conducting V&V activities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Being a constructive participant in networked communities. Covers digital footprint management, online etiquette and professional communication, collaborative tools, attribution and copyright, cyberbullying recognition and response, and the responsibilities that come with amplification. Use when helping learners think about how to behave online -- not what is technically allowed, but what is actually healthy for themselves and their communities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "plan chunks", "break this down", "plan the implementation", or when a story has status planning and needs implementation details before building. Required before any story can be implemented. Transforms story sparks into detailed chunk-by-chunk implementation plans with full technical specifics, file lists, and risk analysis. Supports parallel planning of multiple stories via batch mode.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing a skillsaw PR. Dispatches 7 specialist reviewers (Architecture, Python Expert, Security & Supply Chain, QA Engineer, Technical Writer, Ecosystem, Slopinator) as parallel sub-agents by default, then synthesizes a single verdict. Use --serial for cheaper inline execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writing effective code documentation - API docs, README files, inline comments, and technical guides. Use for documenting codebases, APIs, or writing developer guides.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically creates user-facing changelogs from git commits by analyzing commit history, categorizing changes, and transforming technical commits into clear, customer-friendly release notes. Turns hours of manual changelog writing into minutes of automated generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes Python engineering tasks to specialist skills by matching trigger patterns before any architecture, plan, or code is written. Use when working with Typer CLI frameworks, Rich or Textual terminal UIs, CLI UI/UX design, questionary prompts, FastMCP/MCP servers, ty type checker, uv package manager, Hatchling build backend, TOML editing, pre-commit/prek hooks, async Python, PyPI packaging, complex linting, technical debt modernization, testing workflows, feature development, or stdlib-only scripting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous feature research and gap analysis. Use when starting /add-new-feature or analyzing existing architecture documents. Explores codebase patterns, identifies ambiguities, and produces feature-context-{slug}.md for orchestrator RT-ICA phase. Does NOT make technical decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fetch and report current API syntax, changelog entries, and breaking changes for a specific library or protocol version. One research angle within a parallel technical-research set — runs independently and returns a structured cited report. Invoke when a specific library name and version are the target.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research community usage patterns, real-world gotchas, and client compatibility for a specific known library, tool, or protocol feature. Use when a technical-researcher orchestrator needs community-sourced evidence about a named library or feature — bug reports, workarounds, compatibility gaps, and patterns from issue trackers and discussions. Distinct from the broad ecosystem-researcher agent — this skill targets a KNOWN entity and mines what real users have actually experienced, not what exists in a domain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transforms validated /linear-walkthrough artifacts into one presentation-ready deck outline per major codebase component. Use when the user asks to create a presentation, prepare a walkthrough deck, build an onboarding deck, produce an architecture review deck, or summarize a codebase for a technical audience. Requires walkthrough directory output -- reads unified walkthrough, per-section files, validation reports, coverage maps, entry points, and open questions -- then orchestrates four parallel agent phases to produce slide outlines with speaker notes, evidence references, and suggested visuals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explains Chain of Verification (CoVe) prompt design — a 4-step pattern separating generation from independent factual verification. Use when designing prompts that require factual accuracy, reducing hallucinations, checking technical standards or APIs, or producing step-by-step procedures where subtle errors are costly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze git branches and generate structured MR/PR descriptions with domain-based change categorization — bug fixes, enhancements, technical debt, documentation, testing, build/CI, and non-functional changes. Use when preparing merge request descriptions, pull request bodies, writing changelogs from git diffs, documenting branch changes, or generating release notes. Works with GitHub and GitLab without requiring JIRA or issue tracker integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review documentation for quality, clarity, SEO, and technical correctness. Optimized for Docus/Nuxt Content but works with any Markdown documentation. Use when asked to: "review docs", "check documentation", "audit docs", "validate documentation", "improve docs quality", "analyze documentation", "check my docs", "review my documentation pages", "validate MDC syntax", "check for SEO issues", "analyze doc structure". Provides actionable recommendations categorized by priority (Critical, Important, Nice-to-have).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。