1.2万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
SOP for the automated refinement loop (/refine) workflow. Trigger when: - Exhaustively auditing and optimizing pre-existing codebase artifacts. - Applying iterative contraction mapping to reduce code entropy. - Prompt contains: /refine, refinement loop, contraction mapping, fixed-point sweep.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phased risk-centric security assessment framework. Trigger when: - Auditing code for vulnerabilities, checking SQL injection, access control, or buffer overflows. - Prompt contains: /security-audit, security audit, taint analysis, threat model, vulnerability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SOP for formal mathematical domain modeling. Trigger when: - Creating new formal models or applying mathematical lenses to analyze existing specifications. - Navigating phases: Identify, Select, Construct, Validate, Record, Connect. - Prompt contains: /form, form workflow, categorical, coalgebraic, linear logic, information-theoretic, validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SOP for structured documentation lifecycle. Trigger when: - Designing, writing, reviewing, or auditing large-scale documentation structures. - Navigating phases: Audit, Plan, Draft, Review, Verify. - Prompt contains: /doc, doc workflow, audit, draft, review, verify, documentation debt.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rules, conventions, and constraints for formatting git commit messages and committing at logical boundaries. Trigger when: - Drafting, revising, or validating git commit messages. - Pausing at commit boundaries under the CORE or CONTINUE workflows. - Evaluating whether a changeset should be split into multiple commits. - Prompt contains keywords: commit message, git commit, conventional commits, commit hygiene, commit guidelines, logical boundary, spaghetti diff, atomic commit, commit boundary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SOP for the micro-execution C.O.R.E. phase. Trigger when: - Implementing plan steps, managing code changes at commit boundaries, and verifying incremental progress. - Navigating states: Absorb, Clarify, Plan, Execute. - Prompt contains: /core, core workflow, absorb, clarify, execution invariants, commit boundary, verify assertion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy a crouton app to Cloudflare Workers PRODUCTION (<app>.friendlyinter.net). A deliberate, human-initiated action — separate from the default staging /deploy skill. Use ONLY when explicitly asked to ship/release to production. Never run as part of routine work or an automated flow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a monthly digest of the skills in this repo's flow system — a render-only HTML + plain-text email listing every skill grouped by job, plus a "what was added / updated / removed since last digest" band computed from git history. Use when asked for a "skills digest", "what skills do we have", "skills report", "what skills changed", or to keep the skill surface from sprawling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Before creating a GitHub issue or epic, search for an existing related one and force a reuse / replace / new decision — so the issue-first flow can't silently mint a duplicate. The create-time half of the dedup gate (the pickup-time half is /issue-sanity-check). Use whenever you're about to open an issue/epic, or run /issue-dedup. Backed by a hard PreToolUse hook on issue_write create.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verified lookup pack for crouton's schema→CRUD generation domain — the fieldsFile JSON format, the complete field-type catalog with aliases, the naming contract, the exact artifact list one generate run produces, the seed/default-layout pipeline, dialect defaults, and rollback semantics. Use when writing or reviewing a collection schema, when asking "what field types exist / what does `crouton config` actually generate / where did this file name come from / why did I get a pg schema", when a generated file's name or path doesn't match the docs, or when removing/regenerating a collection. Trigger phrases — "what field types are supported", "schema JSON format", "what files does crouton generate", "naming convention for collections", "rollback a collection", "dialect default". The generation WORKFLOW (steps + sign-off gates) lives in the `crouton` skill — this is the reference it doesn't carry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author a placeable layout block that looks right at ANY pane size. The one hard rule — size to the PANE with container queries (@container), never the viewport — plus list/form playbooks and the sizing contract (minWidth etc.) the viability metric reads. Use when adding/converting a croutonLayoutBlocks block, or when a block overflows/breaks in a narrow pane.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the "get dependencies current" flow for this monorepo — sweep for available updates, triage into safe / deliberate / wait buckets, bump the pnpm catalog, and prove it with the typecheck + e2e gate. Use when asked to "update dependencies", "are we on the latest", "do the quarterly sweep", "bump deps", or when the recurring sweep ticket comes due. We run NO update bot on purpose (#141) — this skill IS the update process.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track work as GitHub issues in this monorepo — create epics + child/sub-issues, label them consistently by package/app, and tie them into the commit workflow. Use when planning a feature, breaking work into tasks, or asked to "track this in GitHub", "make issues", "set up tracking".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A pessimistic go/no-go the moment you pick up a GitHub issue — read it skeptically and hunt for reasons NOT to do it (already done? obsolete? duplicate? premise wrong? cheaper way? net-negative?), returning proceed / reshape / drop with one-line evidence. The pickup-time half of the dedup gate (the create-time half is /issue-dedup). Use as step 1 of the Task Execution Workflow, or run /issue-sanity-check
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[OPTIONAL] AI-powered visual generation using Google Nano Banana Pro. For user flows, architecture diagrams, mockups.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Developer role in AID methodology. Use for implementation, debugging, technical design, TDD workflow, code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add, change, or debug external API integrations, vendor SDK adapters, and bridges to legacy business workflows. Use when an Action or domain service needs an outer technical dependency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolve, validate, and audit manuscript integrity and applicable requirements for academic manuscripts and paper artifacts. Use when Codex needs to determine active paper rules from manuscript state, paper type, venue, submission stage, or workflow mode; lint a LaTeX paper project; assess submission readiness; create or update a paper policy profile; explain why a rule is active; or validate the paper-policy registries. Do not use as the primary skill for prose drafting, peer review, rebuttal writing, citation discovery, or figure/table creation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, revise, and validate publication-ready academic paper figures and tables. Use for LaTeX tables, related-work comparison tables, result tables, notation/dataset/taxonomy tables, precise source-data-driven experiment plots from CSV/JSON/logs, generated conceptual figures such as system overviews/pipelines/architectures/threat models, captions, artifact specs, source-data traceability, and paper-ready PDF/SVG/PNG/LaTeX exports. Do not use for prose-only paper writing, self-review, reviewer response, rebuttal drafting, or external literature-management workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use ruPet as a practical companion for Ruflo and ruvnet tool workflows, or improve ruPet creation and repair prompts. Use for requests that name ruPet or ask for its tool-aware guidance; ordinary tasks and merely displaying the pet do not need this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build an evidence-backed working model of an existing codebase. Use when you must orient in a large or unfamiliar repository; explain architecture or a subsystem; trace a request, runtime, control, or data flow for a concrete question or bug; analyze a branch, commit, diff, or pull request for behavioral impact and blast radius; or assess AI-generated or changed code against requirements, contracts, invariants, tests, and runtime evidence. Default to read-only investigation. Do not trigger only because a coding task touches an existing repository; use when understanding or verification is the requested outcome or a substantial prerequisite.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
個人開発(レビュアーが自分ひとり)で、Issue起票→ブランチ作成→コミット→PR作成→マージ→リリースタグ→取り消し までを gh CLI で一貫管理するための運用ルールとテンプレート集。「ブランチ切って」「ブランチ名どうする」「コミットして」「PR出して」「プルリク作って」「PRのタイトル/説明書いて」「Issue立てて」「課題を整理して」「マージして」「リリースして」「前の状態に戻して」などの依頼で必ず使用する。app-orchestrator の追加開発モード(ブランチ+PR)を実行するときの具体手順もこのスキルに従う。GitHub MCP は使わず gh CLI を使う。
Package an AI skill, prompt workflow, or internal operating habit into a public-ready release with a catchy hook, safe redaction, useful examples, demo tasks, README copy, and launch messaging. Use when preparing a skill for GitHub, social sharing, marketplace submission, documentation, or community feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze folders of Markdown/text research notes, Obsidian vaults, paper cards, invention notes, or memory exports as a practical knowledge map. Use when asked to find center topics, noisy or low-signal notes, possible contamination, overgrown topic groups, orphan notes, cleanup actions, or a useful public knowledge-hygiene workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。