2,014 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Expert guidance for Cosign, the Sigstore tool for signing, verifying, and attaching metadata to container images and other OCI artifacts. Helps developers implement supply chain security by signing images in CI/CD, verifying signatures before deployment, and attaching SBOMs and vulnerability scan results as attestations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ClearML is an open-source MLOps platform that records machine-learning experiments, versions datasets, chains tasks into pipelines and runs them on remote machines through agents and queues. Use when a user asks to "track experiments with ClearML", "log metrics, artifacts and models", "version a dataset", "run training on a remote GPU with clearml-agent", "build a ClearML pipeline", "run hyperparameter optimization", or "self-host ClearML Server". Covers the clearml 2.x Python SDK, clearml-agent 3.x and ClearML Server 2.x.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconstructs the workflow behind a past artifact by querying local ax session, recall, and commit history data. Use when a user asks "what made X work", "how was Y shipped/built", "extract workflow from <date|sha>", "workflow around <topic>", "recipe for this feature", or similar. It finds the anchor session or commit, inspects ax sessions, ax recall, and ax sessions show, and returns an ordered read-only narrative with decisions and evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit experiment integrity against the evidence ledger. At L2 (repo + result files present) a fresh cross-model reviewer reads the eval code line-by-line for fake/derived ground truth, score self-normalization, phantom results (a paper number with no backing file/key), dead/uncalled metric code, verified-scope inflation, method-described ≠ method-evaluated drift, synthesized-looking results, placeholder/fake data still wired into a released result, code-output ≠ reported-number mismatch, and missing reproducibility artifacts (an empirical/agent/LLM paper shipping neither code nor the prompts/configs its results need) — every finding span-anchored to a ledger claim_id. At L0/L1 (PDF / source only) the same patterns are surfaced as info-level 'could-not-verify' signals where the ledger gives an anchor (observability_level_required:2) — NEVER a fraud verdict from a PDF. The reviewer PROPOSES findings; tools/adjudicate_findings.py computes the verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "experiment forensics", "audit the results", "check the eval code", "实验诚实度".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end substantive-integrity forensic sweep of a research paper (especially autoresearch / AI-Scientist-style output). Orchestrates the whole pipeline: ingest (arxiv-id | pdf | dir → working dir + pdftotext for L0) → /evidence-ledger (artifact manifest + observability level L0/L1/L2 + span-anchored claims.json) → fan out the integrity auditor skills (consistency, citation, baseline, experiment, presentation, proof-derivation, eval-design — each reads the ledger, emits span-anchored findings) + the zero-verdict-weight AIS writing-style track → advisory memos (/adversarial-case-builder + /novelty-duplication-advisory, no verdict weight) → deterministic tools/adjudicate_findings.py (--ledger REQUIRED) → reviewer-ready Integrity Forensics Report. Cross-model (fresh codex per dimension) and reviewer≠adjudicator: the model proposes findings, the deterministic adjudicator decides the verdict. Observability-aware, detect-only, never an opaque AI-text classifier (a separate zero-weight AIS section lists AI writing-style impressions, never moving the verdict). Triggers: "anti-autoresearch", "integrity audit this paper", "forensic review", "audit a submission", "审一篇投稿的诚信".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Checkable-ish surface presentation signals a reviewer notices first — duplicate/near-identical tables, leftover pipeline/template strings, too-few or LLM-looking figures, and page-padding. AUXILIARY ONLY and weak by design: a deterministic pass (tools/check_presentation.py — dup-table + pipeline-artifact) plus a fresh cross-model GROSS-cases-only semantic pass (thin-float, LLM-figure, page-padding), every above-info finding span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json). The adjudicator CAPS everything at minor (SURFACE_ONLY_SKILLS + SURFACE_PATTERNS) — these contribute at most SOFT_FLAGS, never a HARD verdict — default false_positive_risk:high. NOTE: the pure AI writing-STYLE impressions (AI-flavor prose, defensive 'not-X-but-Y' hedging, narrative-arc, jargon-stuffing, invented codenames) MOVED to the zero-verdict-weight AIS track — for those use skills/ai-style-impressions, NOT this. Emits presentation-signals.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "presentation signals", "surface check", "duplicate tables", "排版信号".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive codebase orientation for a HUMAN who wants to learn the code. Runs the same tree-sitting + featuring pipeline as exploring-codebases but synthesizes it into guided exercises and an HTML teaching artifact rather than an analysis document. Use for "orient me to this repo", "teach me this codebase", "walk me through this code", "learning orientation", or when someone wants genuine comprehension rather than a task completed. The audience is the test: if nobody is being taught and the goal is to get work done, use exploring-codebases instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DEPRECATED — superseded by tree-sitting. This skill generated persistent _MAP.md files; tree-sitting does the same AST extraction at runtime (~700ms for 250 files) with no artifact to write, commit, or keep in sync. Use tree-sitting for "map this codebase", "explore repo", "understand structure", or any code navigation task. The final working version is archived at release mapping-codebases-v0.8.0.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds and revises a complete skill DIRECTORY — SKILL.md, scripts, references, assets — and packages it. Use for "create a skill for X", "turn this into a skill", "update/improve this skill", "why doesn't my skill trigger", "review this SKILL.md", "package this skill", or when a repeated procedure should become a reusable artifact. Enforces the structure that makes skills work — a concrete procedure rather than a goal statement, an explicit applicability boundary, failure modes with their signals, a runtime verification step, and a description checked against the existing catalogue for confusability. For choosing whether the instruction should be a skill at all rather than project instructions or a prompt, use crafting-instructions. For writing quality inside the prose, use writing-instructions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create interactive data visualizations using Vega-Lite declarative JSON grammar. Supports 20+ chart types (bar, line, scatter, histogram, boxplot, grouped/stacked variations, etc.) via templates and programmatic builders. Use when users upload data for charting, request specific chart types, or mention visualizations. Produces portable JSON specs with inline data islands that work in Claude artifacts and can be adapted for production.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-context adversarial review for deliverables before shipping. Use when producing blog posts, technical recommendations, analysis briefs, code, or any artifact where accuracy matters more than speed. Triggers on "challenge this", "review before shipping", "adversarial pass", "stress test this".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The spec-to-plan bridge. /feature supplies an approved spec; initial full-lane HTML sprint review may supply a ready draft only through draft_for_pair. Creates the same-format plan with exact paths, tests, dependencies and complete criterion coverage. The initial paired review has no execution authority until one real user reply approves both artifacts. Ordinary sequential planning retains approved-source binding and plan approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage git worktrees across any repository with the `gwm` Rust binary (CLI + ratatui TUI). Use when the user asks to create / list / remove / bootstrap / switch / link worktrees, run a command across worktrees (`gwm exec`) or reclaim build artifacts (`gwm clean`), materialise a PR into a worktree (`gwm review`), drive a multi-repo workspace (`--workspace`), run the JSON daemon / statusline (`gwm daemon`, `gwm statusline`), list or pin AI-agent sessions per worktree (`gwm agents`, Claude Code / Codex / opencode / Mistral Vibe detection), seed config from a preset (`gwm init --preset`), diagnose with `gwm doctor`, drive tmux/zellij, or wire `gcd` via `gwm shell-init`. Also covers multi-forge (#419): GitHub via `gh` **or** GitLab via `glab`, the `forge` / `[forge_hosts]` keys, and `gwm trust add`. Triggers on `gwm`, `gwq`, `git worktree`, `.gwm.toml`, `forge`, `forge_hosts`, `glab`, `gwm trust add`, GitLab MR, `gwm create`, `gwm list`, `gwm exec`, `gwm clean`, `gwm review`, `gwm daemon`, `gwm statusline`, `gwm agents`, `gwm note`, `gwm bootstrap`, `gwm doctor`, `gwm switch`, `gwm tmux`, `gwm zellij`, `gwm link`, `gwm status`, `gwm shell-init`, `gcd`, `feat/#`, `fix/#`, GitHub issue/PR linking on a worktree.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running or explaining the ClawScan CLI, including one-off agent-skill scans, benchmark runs, scanner fixtures, judge harness commands, env var validation, and interpreting clawscan-run-v1 and clawscan-benchmark-v1 artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create beautiful, professional HTML or React slide decks ready for fullscreen presentation. Use this skill when the user wants to: create a PPT/slide/presentation from an idea or outline; build a visually stunning slide deck from existing content; generate an HTML presentation that can be projected fullscreen; convert a document into a presentation. Trigger when you hear: 'create slides', 'make a PPT', 'presentation', 'slide deck', 'pitch deck', 'vibe ppt', 'make a talk', or any request to create a presentation. This skill produces a single self-contained HTML/React artifact — no backend, no installation, no dependencies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help the user understand the current topic visually with concise diagrams, code-shape sketches, and focused HTML artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants crawl coverage, platform detection, dataLayer discovery, or a fresh artifact directory before grouping and schema work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create stakeholder alignment artifacts including responsibility matrices, decision frameworks, and communication plans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translate existing blog posts into one or more target languages with SEO-optimized localization. Produces native-quality translations that preserve markdown structure, frontmatter, schema JSON-LD, image and chart embeds, and citation capsules. Localizes keywords, meta tags, numbers, dates, currencies, and quote styles per locale. Flags machine-translation artifacts for review. Run BEFORE blog-localize: this handles language conversion; localize handles cultural adaptation after translation completes. Use when user says "translate blog", "blog translate", "uebersetzen", "traduire", "traducir", "translate post", "blog auf Deutsch", "blog en espanol".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repurpose existing content into a native X (Twitter) post or thread. Take a LinkedIn post, blog, YouTube script, or newsletter and rewrite it for X: re-hook for the no-fold first line, refit to 280 chars or a thread, strip off-platform artifacts, run the humanizer, publish via Publora on approval. Not for writing from scratch (use x-post-writer or x-thread-builder), not for auditing a draft (use x-humanizer --mode audit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run outcome-focused Firecrawl workflows that produce deliverables such as research reports, literature reviews over published papers, SEO audits, QA reports, lead lists, knowledge bases, website design systems, and other structured web-data artifacts. Use when the user wants Firecrawl to complete a business, marketing, product, or creative workflow rather than merely scrape a page or integrate API calls into code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repository quality gates for Rust and generated artifacts. Use when validating changes locally or before committing Rust, schema, or documentation updates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants a written, reviewable plan or spec produced before coding starts. Triggers on: mapping out changes without implementing, thinking through risks of upgrades or migrations, evaluating approaches before committing to one, writing specs for team review, phasing work into stages, or any request that explicitly defers coding ('don't implement yet', 'before we build'). The distinguishing signal is that the user wants a plan artifact — not implementation, not a conversational answer. MUST activates inside Claude's native plan mode to have a better planning behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for quality, correctness, and fit. Use when the user wants judgment on code that already exists — their own changes, a teammate's patch, a PR, branch, commit, diff, staged changes, or one or more files to look over. Activate on requests like review, look over, sanity check, critique, code review, or 'is this good?' The key signal is that the user wants evaluation of existing code and its tradeoffs, not implementation, debugging, or explanation. This skill works independently, but when plans, specs, task artifacts, or prior discussion exist, use them to understand why the code exists before judging it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。