「contract」の検索結果

Scans Cosmos SDK blockchains for 9 consensus-critical vulnerabilities including non-determinism, incorrect signers, ABCI panics, and rounding errors. Use when auditing Cosmos chains or CosmWasm contracts. (project, gitignored)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans Cairo/StarkNet smart contracts for 6 critical vulnerabilities including felt252 arithmetic overflow, L1-L2 messaging issues, address conversion problems, and signature replay. Use when auditing StarkNet projects. (project, gitignored)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans Algorand smart contracts for 11 common vulnerabilities including rekeying attacks, unchecked transaction fees, missing field validations, and access control issues. Use when auditing Algorand projects (TEAL/PyTeal). (project, gitignored)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialist skill for Python data engineering — pandas, polars, DuckDB, numpy, ETL pipelines, tabular data ingestion, and notebook-to-module extraction. Use when working with dataframes, data validation at ingress boundaries, merge/join operations, typed column contracts, or choosing between pandas vs polars vs DuckDB for a data task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides pytest test architecture for Python 3.11+ using behavioral contracts, risk, and maintenance-adjusted value. Use when choosing unit/integration/property/e2e boundaries, fixture strategy, coverage measurement, or mutation testing. Preserves existing project gates but does not invent test-pyramid ratios, coverage percentages, mutation-score targets, or tests for implementation detail.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review pytest test effectiveness against authoritative contracts, relevant faults, behavior-preserving refactors, realistic boundaries, isolation, and diagnostics. Use for test-quality audits, coverage-gap reviews, regression-test changes, or mocking reviews; preserve existing project gates rather than inventing coverage targets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes a four-phase feature addition workflow (Discovery, Planning, TDD Implementation, Verification) for Python projects. Use when adding a new feature end-to-end — discovering project structure and integration points, drafting a feature spec with MoSCoW-prioritized requirements and BDD acceptance criteria, implementing via test-first TDD cycles, then verifying with ruff lint, ty type checks, and behavior-focused regression and contract coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate pytest failures without treating tests or implementation as automatic authority. Use when diagnosing regressions, debugging test errors, or deciding whether to fix a test or code; trace the contract, product, fixture, and observation before choosing an evidence-backed correction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze specific pytest failures using authoritative contracts and a cited product/test evidence chain. Use for failing test names or pytest output, distinguishing product, interface, oracle, and harness defects without automatically changing expectations or forcing an architectural redesign.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compatibility router for semantic skill tightening. Delegate goal recovery, authority, semantic conservation, evaluation contracts, and instruction optimization to Skill Lapidary rather than duplicating that system in Plugin Creator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compatibility router for skill goal recovery and authority assessment. Delegate to Skill Lapidary's establish-validatable-goals capability rather than maintaining a second goal-contract system in Plugin Creator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review existing tests against the software and contracts they actually exercise. Use to assess whether a test has justified unique protection, detects consequential faults, tolerates valid refactors, earns its lifecycle cost, or deserves strengthening, replacement, consolidation, or removal consideration. Reviews are read-only and evidence-backed, including TDD and regression tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate whether an implementation plan can achieve its stated outcome before execution. Use to check requirement coverage, task contracts, dependencies, data/artifact flow, testability, ownership, impact coverage, and executable ordering without checking whether implementation already exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load the shared verdict, punch-list, SKIP, and gate schema used by the dh multi-perspective review orchestrator, reviewers, and synthesizer. Use only when one of those components must produce, parse, validate, or gate review results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trace bugs, CI failures, and unexpected behavior from reproduced evidence to a causal mechanism and governing contract. Distinguish product, architecture, test-oracle, and harness defects; investigate intermittent failures with controlled experiments and report unresolved evidence explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Where a dispatched step puts its output, and how it signals state upstream.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Local codebase analysis research angle — derives behavioral contracts, coding conventions, SKILL.md flow insertion points, and agent data availability maps from actual source files. Use when the blocking question is answered by reading the repository: what does this function actually do, what pattern does the codebase use for X, where in this workflow does a new step go, or what data does this agent already have.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit documentation claims against implementation and authoritative repository evidence. Use when checking whether README, architecture, configuration, API, usage, or feature documentation is stale, incomplete, contradicted by code, missing implemented behavior, or inconsistent with a normative contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Which agent a dh workflow dispatches, and the artifact consumer invariant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews Python boundaries, typing, error handling, tests, dependencies, and supported-version idioms against the target project's contracts and active tools. Loaded by dh:code-reviewer for Python source; uses Python-engineering standards when available and retains standalone checks otherwise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews LLM integration, prompt templates, model selection, token/cost budgets, evaluation harnesses, structured outputs, retries, and streaming. Checks trust boundaries and task evidence against the selected provider/model contract rather than prescribing universal model tiers or sampling settings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for architecture review, dependency graphs, coupling analysis, or circular dependency detection. Establishes project module namespaces and traces imports plus Claude plugin hook, skill, script, PEP 723, and MCP boundaries. Emits partitioned Mermaid graphs with cycle, coupling, and ownership signals; verifies contract and consequence before assigning severity. Registers diagrams as codebase-analysis artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews skill, agent, and plugin artifacts against their intended consumer's schema and runtime contract. Loaded by dh:code-reviewer for SKILL.md, agent definitions, or plugin manifests; checks discovery, frontmatter, triggers, tools, context cost, bundled references, and caller handoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the plan_ref returned by add-new-feature is provided. Executes the SAM implementation loop — opens an attempt per ready task, dispatches each to a specialist agent in parallel, settles and judges what comes back, manages bookend tasks (T0 baseline capture and TN verification), and tracks concerns and contract violations per task. Drives task state through the work ledger via the SAM CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。