「decision」の検索結果

Turn project evidence into maintainable Notion briefs, decision records, runbooks, and status documents without overwriting unrelated content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MANDATORY prerequisite — load this skill BEFORE every `generate_diagram` tool call. NEVER call `generate_diagram` directly without loading this skill first. Trigger whenever the user asks to create, generate, draw, render, sketch, or build a diagram — flowchart, architecture diagram, sequence diagram, ERD or entity-relationship diagram, state diagram or state machine, gantt chart, or timeline. Also trigger when the user mentions Mermaid syntax or wants a system architecture, decision tree, dependency graph, API call flow, auth handshake, schema, or pipeline visualized in FigJam. Routes to type-specific guidance, sets universal Mermaid constraints, and tells you when to use a different diagram type or skip the tool entirely (mindmaps, pie charts, class diagrams, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect GenLayer Intelligent Contract decisions to ERC-7710-style delegated authority. Use when an agent needs to design the interface, message schema, relayer/bridge path, EVM revocation controller, constraint updates, proof/finality assumptions, and failure handling that turn a GenLayer agent-performance review into ERC-7710 revocation or policy changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manually arbitrate NLA escrow fulfillments as an alternative to the automated oracle. Use when the user wants to review pending arbitration requests, evaluate demands against fulfillments, and submit on-chain decisions. Supports both interactive and LLM-auto modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internet Court adapter for GenLayer Intelligent Contract supervision. Use to specify agent-performance rubrics, evidence schemas, decision outputs, and ERC-7710 connector expectations, while delegating actual GenLayer contract writing, linting, testing, deployment, and CLI interaction to the official GenLayer skills at https://skills.genlayer.com/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Nowledge Mem for cross-tool startup context, recall of prior decisions, durable learnings, explicit conversation saving, and connection diagnosis. Use only the connection selected for this DeepChat agent or session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive Apache Hudi table design advisor. Turns workload requirements into architecture guidance and an Architecture Decision Record through a tiered conversational flow, with configuration bundles on implemented executable routes. Invoke when a user wants help designing a new Hudi table or evaluating an existing design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optional maintainer workflow for the approval, merge-readiness, or authorized self-merge decision on a LoopX pull request. Requires the exact-head review evidence from `loopx pr-review`. Review depth, verdicts, review comments, and the published review format belong to loopx-pr-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect authorized LoopX Goals, Todos and deliveries to explain progress, identify owner decisions and delegate intent to the right worker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a LoopX worker is operating an auto-research lane, demo pane, frontier item, evidence packet, promotion/retirement decision, or visible tmux/Codex auto-research rehearsal. Identity must come from the LoopX role profile and quota/frontier packet; this skill only provides role-specific execution checklists, artifact contracts, and stop conditions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

5-phase planning: PRD analysis, design review, technical decisions, dynamic research team, metrics. Produces a complete implementation plan + ADRs before any code is written.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save the current session state (decisions, modified files, current status, and next steps) to a handoff file for later resume.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Claude Code and Codex hooks for validity, safety, and correctness across settings.json, hooks.json, config.toml, plugin, and skill or agent frontmatter hooks. Resolves each command, checks event names, handler types, matchers, exit-code and JSON decision strategy, and timeouts against each host's documented rules, then reviews hooks one by one. Use when setting up hooks, debugging a hook that never fires, never blocks, or hangs the agent, or doing a periodic hooks hygiene pass. Not for writing a new hook from scratch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill helps users discover key contacts across industries, roles, and social platforms via the BrowserAct API. Agent should proactively apply this skill when users express needs like finding public profiles for founders or CEOs, discovering key decision-makers in a specific industry, extracting contact details for lead generation, searching for growth leaders on LinkedIn or Facebook, gathering professional networking profiles, retrieving URLs and names of industry leaders, finding marketing managers in a specific field, conducting competitive analysis by identifying key personnel, sourcing talent acquisition targets across platforms, or compiling a list of target roles on specific social sites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Holistic, system-aware planning before implementing non-trivial tasks. Use when the task involves new features, architectural decisions, multi-file changes, unclear requirements, or multiple valid approaches. Triggers on "/plan", "plan this", "design an approach", "let's plan first".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill encodes Emil Kowalski's philosophy on UI polish, component design, animation decisions, and the invisible details that make software feel great.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to co-author documentation, draft a proposal, write a technical spec, create a decision doc or RFC, or structure a substantial document through iterative collaboration and reader testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "write an experiment report", "summarize experimental results", "do experiment retrospection", "write a results report", "写实验总结报告", "写实验复盘", or mentions turning completed experiment artifacts into a structured, decision-oriented research report. It assumes strict analysis should come from `results-analysis` first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft, audit, or revise point-by-point reviewer response letters for Nature-family manuscript revisions. Use when the user provides reviewer comments, editor decision letters, revision notes, response drafts, or asks how to respond to major/minor revision requests, rebuttal letters, response to reviewers, peer-review reports, 审稿意见回复, 逐点回复, 修回信, 大修回复, 小修回复, or 如何回复 reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Call MCP Server tools directly via the mcporter CLI. Use when you need to interact with external APIs (GitHub, weather, etc.) without delegating to a Worker — useful for quick lookups or when you need a result to make a decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before sending or suppressing any Leader message to Workers, Manager, or Team Admin. Always use this skill for cross-room Matrix messages, @mention decisions, task assignment notifications, structured status reports, completion reports, blocker/revision messages, questions, requester updates, or when deciding whether a same-room reply is enough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish MSBuild/.NET build performance baselines before optimizing. USE FOR: a .NET build or solution that is slow or has build-performance concerns; cold, warm, incremental, or no-op measurements; before/after comparisons; CI build output caching; static graph build decisions; artifacts output; and dependency graph trimming. Start here before build-perf-diagnostics, incremental-build, or build-parallelism. DO NOT USE for webpack, npm, JavaScript bundlers, or other non-MSBuild build systems. For detailed target/task/analyzer bottleneck analysis after baselining, use build-perf-diagnostics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Alias for router-feedback — submit feedback about a Weave Router decision or model performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。