「diff」の検索結果

Use this skill before answering, planning, or editing whenever .NET tests or CI are switching from VSTest to Microsoft.Testing.Platform (MTP), or an MTP migration behaves differently. Triggers include "switch from VSTest"; MSTest/NUnit/xUnit MTP enablement; OutputType=Exe only for test projects in Directory.Build.props; EnableMSTestRunner, EnableNUnitRunner, UseMicrosoftTestingPlatformRunner, or YTest.MTP.XUnit2; .NET 10 global.json test.runner and TestingPlatformDotnetTestSupport; translating VSTest filters, logger, coverage, blame, or dump arguments; replacing VSTest@3; and exit code 8 or zero tests. Also use for xUnit v3 MTP filters during a v2-to-v3 upgrade. Do not use for framework conversion, TFM, UWP, or WinUI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grade curated individual tests for readiness, A-F quality and improvements. ALWAYS USE FOR: grade tests, review only a named test, per-test readiness or quality bands for supplied methods, bodies, file spans or bounded PR diffs, including existing tests. Return Pass/Failed/Uncertain/Not applicable; unresolved/empty scopes omit grades. Compose read-only per-test evidence. Polyglot. DO NOT USE FOR: suite audits (test-engineer/test-anti-patterns), concrete fix/feature detection proof (test-value-evidence), writing/fixing tests, or coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares two or more dotnet new templates side by side to help users choose between them based on parameters, feature support, frameworks, and classifications. USE FOR: deciding between similar templates (webapi vs webapp, blazor vs blazorwasm, console vs worker), producing a side-by-side comparison of parameters and feature support, understanding how templates differ before creating a project. DO NOT USE FOR: creating a project from a template (use template-instantiation), authoring or validating custom templates (use template-authoring and template-validation), general single-template discovery (use template-discovery).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Share state between components that don't have a direct parent-child parameter relationship, using cascading values, scoped services with change events, or CascadingValueSource via DI. USE WHEN the user needs a CascadingParameter or CascadingValue that works across render mode boundaries, a shopping cart or notification count accessible from multiple pages, a theme or user preference cascaded app-wide, or when components in different parts of the tree must react when shared data changes. Also USE WHEN cascading values aren't reaching interactive children in per-page interactivity mode, or when the user needs to understand scoped vs singleton service lifetime for state on Blazor Server. DO NOT USE for direct parent-child parameter passing or EventCallback (see author-component), for persisting state across prerender-to-interactive transitions (see support-prerendering), or for service abstractions for data fetching in Auto/WebAssembly (see fetch-and-send-data).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide developers through capturing diagnostic artifacts to diagnose production .NET performance issues. Use when the user needs help choosing diagnostic tools, collecting performance data, or understanding tool trade-offs across different environments (Windows/Linux, .NET Framework/modern .NET, container/non-container).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides conversion of a pre-.NET 8 Blazor Server app into a .NET 8+ Blazor Web App. USE FOR: migrating apps that use AddServerSideBlazor and MapBlazorHub to the AddRazorComponents/MapRazorComponents model, converting _Host.cshtml to an App.razor root component, replacing blazor.server.js with blazor.web.js, migrating CascadingAuthenticationState to a service, adopting new Blazor Web App features like enhanced navigation and streaming rendering. DO NOT USE FOR: apps that are already Blazor Web Apps (already use AddRazorComponents and MapRazorComponents), Blazor WebAssembly or hosted Blazor WebAssembly apps (different migration path), apps that should stay on the Blazor Server hosting model without converting, or apps still targeting .NET Framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add, configure, or review Ignite UI for Blazor Lite component support in Blazor applications. USE FOR: installing IgniteUI.Blazor.Lite or IgniteUI.Blazor.GridLite, registering AddIgniteUIBlazor() in Blazor Server, WASM, Hybrid, or split Blazor Web App projects, adding @using IgniteUI.Blazor.Controls, wiring the theme stylesheet, picking the right host page, locating the GridLite stylesheet path, explaining single-project vs split Server/Client Web App setup differences, and checking where an interactive render mode is needed for Ignite UI components to work. DO NOT USE FOR: general Blazor component authoring without Ignite UI, choosing app architecture or render mode from scratch (see create-blazor-project), JavaScript interop (see use-js-interop), authentication (see configure-auth), prerendering (see support-prerendering), or layout/component design questions that need no Ignite UI setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choosing an MSBuild CopyToOutputDirectory / CopyToPublishDirectory mode: Never, PreserveNewest, Always, and IfDifferent (MSBuild 17.13+), plus $(SkipUnchangedFilesOnCopyAlways). USE FOR: removing the per-build Always copy perf hit; resetting output files mutated between builds. DO NOT USE FOR: general incremental-build diagnosis (use incremental-build); non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to coordinate with squads on different machines using git as transport

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enables squad agents on different machines to share work via git-based task queuing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Protocol for sending queries, delegating tasks, and sharing context between independent Squad instances across different repositories

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Troubleshoot Kode permission prompts/denials (tool allowlists, commandAllowedTools, dontAsk fail-closed, subagent inheritance). Use when tools are unexpectedly blocked, permission prompts repeat, or behavior differs between main agent and subagents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate low-stakes retrieval-practice questions with grounded answer notes and implementation guidance. Use for quiz starters, revision activities, delayed recall, misconception checks, or adapting recall difficulty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kiln's code conventions and per-area gotchas, plus a diff gate that enforces the mechanical ones. Invoke before writing or changing any Python, TypeScript or Svelte code in the Kiln repo (libs/core, libs/server, app/desktop, app/web_ui), and when reviewing such a change. Covers comments, startup and entry points, globals and module state, config reads, module layering, library-vs-app rules and async I/O.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent, browser-driven QA pass over a branch or PR — scope it, plan it, fan out one subagent per testing area in its own isolated sandbox, compile a severity-ranked markdown report. Use for an "E2E test", "QA pass", "manual test", or "bug bash" request — broader than driving the UI to check one fix (see `playwright`) or reviewing a diff (see `code-review`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover a single-page-app's hidden backend API from its public JS bundle, then test that API for broken access control / missing authentication. One of the highest-yield web plays in modern recon — SPAs ship their entire backend route map to the browser, and the API behind them is frequently missing the auth middleware the login page implies. Built from an authorized engagement where this play found an unauthenticated financial API that an ASM scan reporting hundreds of "Criticals" completely missed. Use whenever a target serves a JS-heavy SPA (React/Vue/Angular/Next), an "app"/"console"/"dashboard"/"portal" subdomain, or any `*api*` host shows up in recon. Leaked build artifacts (source maps / .env / .git / asset-manifest) are owned by hunt-source-leak; API version-inventory and behavioral diffing by hunt-shadow-api; this skill owns mapping a live SPA's backend routes from its JS bundle and testing them for broken access control / missing auth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt Session Management vulnerabilities — session fixation (no regeneration on login), insufficient invalidation on logout / password-change / email-change, predictable or low-entropy session IDs, JWT-as-session with no exp/revocation, refresh-token rotation/reuse-detection gaps, OAuth/SSO session linkage, device-bound-session (DBSC) downgrade, and cookie attribute issues (Secure/HttpOnly/SameSite/__Host-). Validate with TWO real sessions (attacker A + victim B), body-diff every 200, and OOB confirmation for theft chains. Medium to Critical (fixation→admin hijack, no-invalidation→persistent ATO).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt Missing/Weak Rate Limiting — login brute force, OTP/2FA brute force (10^6 keyspace), password-reset-token brute, credential stuffing, username/email enumeration via error-string / status-code / timing differences, weak password policy, missing CAPTCHA (CAPTCHA token replay / single-use / concurrency-window bypass specifics → hunt-captcha-bypass), IP-based rate-limit bypass via X-Forwarded-For and friends, ReDoS. Distinguishes hard lockout vs soft IP-throttle vs CAPTCHA-injection vs silent shadow-throttling (avoids false-negative 'no rate limit' conclusions). Medium to Critical depending on what the brute reaches (OTP→ATO = Critical).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunting skill for auth bypass vulnerabilities. Built from 12 public bug bounty reports across SAML XSW / parser-differential (GitHub Enterprise CVE-2025-25291/25292), SAML signature stripping (Uber, Rocket.Chat, samlify CVE-2025-47949), SAML domain enforcement bypass via control characters (HackerOne 2024), partner-portal cross-IdP assertion reuse (Slack), WordPress XMLRPC bypassing SSO (Uber), JWT alg-confusion HS256/RS256 (Jitsi), JWT signature-validation skip (Linktree, Newspack), and token-audience confusion (Argo CD CVE-2023-22482). For standalone JWT signature/crypto forging (alg:none, key confusion, kid/jku) see hunt-jwt-crypto; this skill covers JWT only inside SSO/SAML/token-trust bypass chains. SAML assertion-layer attacks (XSW, comment injection, signature stripping, XXE-in-assertion) are owned by hunt-saml; this skill owns the broader cross-protocol auth-bypass taxonomy. Use when hunting auth bypass — see the Legacy-Protocol Matrix for branded-UI vs legacy-endpoint patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt CAPTCHA Bypass — 6 distinct patterns: (1) CAPTCHA field simply omitted from the request (server-side validation absent), (2) CAPTCHA token replayed from a solved challenge (no single-use enforcement), (3) CAPTCHA response accepted on a different endpoint than it was solved on (no binding to action/session), (4) static or predictable CAPTCHA values accepted (e.g. '0', 'null', empty string), (5) audio/accessibility CAPTCHA trivially solvable programmatically, (6) CAPTCHA only enforced after N failures (first N requests bypass it). Detection: intercept a successful form submission, remove the CAPTCHA field entirely, replay — if it still succeeds, server-side validation is absent. Medium severity standalone; High when it removes the only rate-limit gate protecting a login, registration, or payment endpoint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MATLAB and GNU Octave numerical computing for matrix operations, data analysis, visualization, and scientific computing. Use when writing MATLAB/Octave scripts for linear algebra, signal processing, image processing, differential equations, optimization, statistics, or creating scientific visualizations. Also use when the user needs help with MATLAB syntax, functions, or wants to convert between MATLAB and Python code. Scripts can be executed with MATLAB or the open-source GNU Octave interpreter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inverse-fold a protein backbone (PDB structure) into amino-acid sequence with ProteinMPNN (Dauparas et al. 2022, github.com/dauparas/ProteinMPNN). Reach for this skill to run sequence design on RFdiffusion backbones, to redesign one chain of a PDB while holding interface residues fixed, or to generate a temperature-swept set of sequences for downstream folding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates your campaign and ad set structure against your actual goals and budget. Flags over-segmentation that fragments your data, under-segmentation that hides performance differences, budget allocation issues, and consolidation opportunities that would improve algorithmic delivery and your ability to optimize. Platform: Google and Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares your key metrics against industry benchmarks for your specific vertical, campaign type, and platform. Tells you where you're ahead, where you're behind, and where there's room to improve — adjusted for your account size and spend level, because a $10K/month account and a $500K/month account have different benchmark realities. Platform: Google and Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。