「ida」の検索結果

Role profile — a reviewer who is fact-seeking, bedrock-seeking, honest, and rejecting. Demands that arguments rest on small facts that cannot be wrong (not on stacked assumptions dressed up as foundation), and that deliberately-unclear concepts be quarantined — never leaked into solid layers, never mixed with each other. Catches the failure mode where designs ship after partial grounding: most of the spec researched, the design feels finished, and the unresearched remainder holds the deal-breaker. Invoke with `/pedantic <target>` (e.g. `/pedantic review this design doc`, `/pedantic review the SDK design`, `/pedantic review this PR`). Probes cover logical structure (definitions, assumptions, boundaries, contradictions, unfalsifiability, vague quantifiers, counterexamples), epistemic honesty (researchable vs. discoverable-only-by-doing), bedrock integrity (assumed-bedrock, leaked uncertainty, mixed unclarity), and design pathology (YAGNI, wrong-layer abstraction, unclear responsibility, fragmentation, over-engineering). Use when you want a hard critique of a plan, design doc, technical doc, code change, or PR description — not a copy edit, not a vibe check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide which family a doc belongs to before drafting — SDK/developer, user/product, or working-group (WG) — since family sets the audience, home, and tone. Use when creating, moving, or restructuring docs, when unsure which directory a doc belongs in, or when a request says "document this" / "write docs for X" without naming the kind. Routes to the specialized skill for each family.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discipline for the seam between two SDKs (or two sides of one contract) that the same hand writes. The failure mode: "we own both sides" produces dirty contracts no foreign reviewer would accept. The exercise: pretend the other side is FFI, IPC, or a network protocol you cannot rewrite. Spawn an adversarial subagent profiled as the producer's maintainer; negotiate the change as a feature request, not a PR. Companion to $sdk-design. Language-agnostic — applies to a TS package + its consumer, a Rust crate + its WASM binding, two services sharing a wire format, or any other boundary the same author writes both ends of.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write any link or URL so it resolves where it is rendered, not where it lives in the repo. Use when authoring or editing a link — in docs, source docstrings, READMEs (incl. npm-published), or product UI: docs cross-refs, "see SECURITY.md", universal `/_/` routes, GitHub URLs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug-fix discipline — every defect has an etiology, the chain of cause that produced the observable fault; trace it before patching. Errors only grow: a bandaid leaks unless genuinely localized and leak-free. Walk the diagnostic ladder (presentation → proximate cause → API contract → isolated or systemic) before writing the fix. Use when authoring or reviewing any bug fix, regression patch, "quick fix" PR, or when deciding whether to ship, defer, or refactor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query images with a local Ollama vision model without loading the image into the main agent context. Use when you need to describe a screenshot, check whether rendered content is present, detect overlapping elements, or ask any visual question about a PNG/JPEG/WebP file. Requires Ollama running locally with the Gemma 4 multimodal model (`gemma4` on Ollama). Script: .agents/skills/vision/scripts/ask.py. Trigger phrases: "describe image", "what does this screenshot show", "does the canvas contain content", "check screenshot visually", "look at this image", "any overlapping elements", "vision query".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research, compare, and update shared AI model JSON for TypeScript, web, and Rust consumers. Covers text model tiers, image and video generation models, image tool models, release provenance, pricing data sourcing, and product-side catalogue cost estimates. Use when bumping model versions, adding new models, updating pricing, or auditing model specs against provider documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Doctrine for drafting and keeping working-group docs under `docs/wg/**` — RFC/RFD specs and findings/research/glossary. A WG doc is a language-agnostic, code-agnostic study of a domain: it argues *why* and defines *what*, never *how in our code*. Use when writing or editing anything under `docs/wg/`, an RFC/RFD, a spec, a design note, a glossary, or research findings — including "write up the design", "document the spec", or "capture what we learned". Not for plans/TODOs (untracked `*.plan.md`), user docs, or SDK API refs — use `docs` to route those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides authoring, organizing, and referencing test fixtures in this repo. Use when creating new fixtures, writing tests that depend on fixtures, or deciding what should be checked into git. Engine fixtures (rendering corpora) live in the engine repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate a filename extension without opening any filesystem path

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build slide decks and presentations for research talks. Use this for making PowerPoint slides, conference presentations, seminar talks, research presentations, thesis defense slides, or any scientific talk. Provides slide structure, design templates, timing guidance, and visual validation. Works with PowerPoint and LaTeX Beamer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from raw idea to a validated, positioned, priced business with a chosen beachhead. Orchestrates ten skills phase by phase - jobs-to-be-done, mom-test, design-sprint, lean-startup, good-strategy-bad-strategy, blue-ocean-strategy, obviously-awesome, hundred-million-offers, monetizing-innovation, crossing-the-chasm - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (CUSTOMER.md, POSITIONING.md, OFFER.md, CREATE-BUSINESS-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to start a new business, validate a startup idea, find product-market fit before building, or says 'I have an idea for a company'. Do not use once the business has paying customers: use grow-business to add revenue and customers, or improve-business to fix strategy and operations. For building the product itself use create-app or create-website. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design products and pricing around validated willingness to pay, from Ramanujam & Tacke's "Monetizing Innovation". Use when the user mentions "pricing", "how much should we charge", "willingness to pay", "pricing page", "packaging", "freemium vs free trial", "are we leaving money on the table", "nobody buys at this price", "price increase", or "good-better-best". Also trigger when designing or auditing pricing and packaging, validating willingness to pay before building, segmenting customers by value, or choosing between subscription, usage-based, and freemium models. Covers price-before-product, willingness-to-pay talks, the four failures (feature shock, minivation, hidden gem, undead), leader/filler/killer packaging, and behavioral pricing. For offers and guarantees, see hundred-million-offers. For what customers value, see jobs-to-be-done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design MVPs, validated learning experiments, and pivot-or-persevere decisions using Build-Measure-Learn. Use when the user mentions "MVP scope", "validated learning", "pivot or persevere", "vanity metrics", "test assumptions", "innovation accounting", "build-measure-learn", "minimum viable experiment", "should we pivot", "test a business idea cheaply", or "build the smallest version first". Also trigger when deciding what to include in a first version, measuring startup progress, or evaluating whether to change direction on a product bet. Covers innovation accounting and actionable metrics. For 5-day prototype testing, see design-sprint. For customer motivation analysis, see jobs-to-be-done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate complete JSON-LD schema markup for blog posts with Article/BlogPosting, Person, Organization, BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, and optional FAQPage. Validates against Google requirements and warns about deprecated types. Use when user says "schema", "blog schema", "json-ld", "structured data", "schema markup", "generate schema".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a directory of multilingual blog content for completeness, consistency, hreflang correctness, meta-tag parity, and freshness. Builds a translation coverage matrix, flags stale translations, validates hreflang and schema, and emits a prioritized report with runnable fix commands. Use when user says "locale audit", "blog locale-audit", "check translations", "multilingual audit", "translation check", "hreflang check", "Uebersetzungen pruefen".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect content decay from Google Search Console exports by comparing current and previous page performance, flagging quarter-over-quarter traffic drops, dropped pages, and refresh, consolidate, prune, or query-shift actions. Use when the user says "/blog decay", "content decay", "traffic drop", "QoQ decline", "GSC decay", or "refresh declining posts".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a dated monthly or quarterly editorial calendar: which posts to publish or review when, content mix, templates, distribution timing, and a material-change review queue. Use when the user says "editorial calendar", "content calendar", "publishing schedule", "what should I write this month". Not for positioning or pillars (blog-strategy), SERP-validated cluster maps (blog-cluster), or detecting declining pages from Search Console exports (blog-decay). Publication frequency is not a ranking signal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrite and optimize existing blog posts for Google SEO (May 2026 Core Update, March 2026 core/spam context, June 2026 spam context, E-E-A-T) and AI citation visibility as one SEO discipline. Full rewrite for both Google rankings AND AI citations. For AI-citation-only audit (no Google work), use blog-geo instead. Replaces fabricated statistics with sourced data, applies answer-first formatting, adds Pixabay/Unsplash images, generates built-in SVG charts, validates Article-priority schema, performs AI content detection, adds citation capsules and information gain markers, and updates freshness signals. Works with any blog format (MDX, markdown, HTML). Use when user says "rewrite blog", "optimize blog", "update blog", "improve blog", "fix blog", "refresh blog post", "blog optimization".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a blog-level strategy for a niche or business: audience segments, 3-5 content pillars with hub-and-spoke clusters, competitive gaps, measurement plan, and a 90-day roadmap. Use when the user says "blog strategy", "content strategy", "blog positioning", "content pillars", "what should I blog about". Not for a dated publishing schedule (blog-calendar), SERP-validated cluster maps (blog-cluster), or a brief or outline for one post (blog-brief, blog-outline). Makes no promise of rankings or AI citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare two Google Search Console page exports (current vs previous period) to flag pages whose clicks or impressions fell by a chosen threshold, with a triage hint (refresh, query shift, consolidate, prune). The 20% default is a screening heuristic, not proof of decay. Use for "/blog decay", "content decay", "QoQ decline", "refresh declining posts". Needs two GSC exports; not for diagnosing a single traffic drop live (blog-google) or rewriting posts (blog-rewrite).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify statistics and claims in blog posts by fetching cited source URLs and checking if the claimed data actually appears on the page. Extracts all load-bearing claims (statistics, product or policy claims, ranking and comparative claims, named sources), validates cited URLs before fetching, and scores match confidence (exact match 1.0, paraphrase 0.7-0.9, not found 0.0). Flags uncited claims as UNVERIFIED and marks a claim verified only when this run fetched the source and found the passage. Checks that a source says what the post says it says; it cannot prove the source is true or verify first-hand experience. Use when the user says "fact check", "verify statistics", "check sources", "factcheck". Report only; not for rewriting posts (blog-rewrite).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill, audit this skill, is this skill safe, vet a skill before installing, what does this skill access. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, spec validation, and security auditing of third-party skills before install.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing WordPress plugins for GPL compliance, checking license headers or compatibility, evaluating upsell/freemium/trialware patterns, validating plugin naming or trademark rules, checking plugin slugs, running Plugin Check (PCP) to validate plugin changes, interpreting its findings, understanding why a plugin was rejected from WordPress.org, or answering questions about the 18 WordPress.org Plugin Directory guidelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。