「metric」の検索結果

Analyze codebase health metrics including complexity and dependencies

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track DeFi protocol metrics including TVL, yields, and liquidations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert delivery management for release planning, deployment strategy, incident response, change management, SLA/error-budget tracking, and DORA metrics across continuous delivery pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and run statistically rigorous A/B tests and experiments. Use when planning experiments, calculating sample sizes, designing test variants, selecting metrics, analyzing results, or when someone says "let's test that."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design RAG pipelines: chunking, retrieval evaluation, and architecture. Use when building a RAG system, selecting a chunking strategy, choosing a vector database, optimizing retrieval quality, or evaluating with RAGAS metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-signup user onboarding optimization covering activation metrics, time-to-value reduction, onboarding flow design, empty state optimization, multi-channel coordination, and stalled user recovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SaaS pricing design and optimization covering value metric selection, tier architecture, price point research, pricing page design, price increase execution, and competitive pricing analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design an executive dashboard spec: north-star metrics, charts, alert thresholds. "design a CMO dashboard"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes social media campaign performance across platforms with engagement metrics, ROI calculations, and audience insights for data-driven marketing decisions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build custom LLM evaluation pipelines using the OpenJudge framework. Covers selecting and configuring graders (LLM-based, function-based, agentic), running batch evaluations with GradingRunner, combining scores with aggregators, applying evaluation strategies (voting, average), auto-generating graders from data, and analyzing results (pairwise win rates, statistics, validation metrics). Use when the user wants to evaluate LLM outputs, compare multiple models, design scoring criteria, or build an automated evaluation system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to design, construct, or improve an offer — the thing they actually sell — including value framing, bonus stacking, guarantee design, scarcity/urgency, naming, and payment structure. Also use when the user mentions 'offer,' 'offer design,' 'build an offer,' 'grand slam offer,' 'irresistible offer,' 'value stack,' 'bonus stack,' 'guarantee,' 'risk reversal,' 'money-back guarantee,' 'scarcity,' 'urgency,' 'high-ticket offer,' 'productize a service,' 'naming an offer,' 'payment plan,' 'down-sell,' 'upsell offer,' or 'why isn't my offer converting.' Best for services, agencies, courses, coaching, info products, high-ticket B2B, and direct-response. If you run pure self-serve SaaS, read pricing first — tiers and packaging do more work there. For price level itself (tiers, freemium, value metric), see pricing. For the page that presents the offer, see copywriting. For the launch moment, see launch. For sales collateral, see sales-enablement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' 'monetization,' 'how much should I charge,' 'my pricing is wrong,' 'pricing page,' 'annual vs monthly,' 'per seat pricing,' 'should I offer a free plan,' 'pricing page teardown,' 'pricing page audit,' 'is my pricing page AI-readable,' or 'can AI read my pricing.' Use this whenever someone is figuring out what to charge, how to structure their plans, or wants to audit a pricing page (for humans and for the AI agents that shortlist tools). For in-app upgrade screens, see paywalls. For offer construction (bonuses, guarantees, value framing, naming) on services/courses/coaching/high-ticket B2B, see offers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Animate a number counting up to its target as it scrolls into view, once. Use for stat/metric blocks to draw the eye to an impressive figure. Honors prefers-reduced-motion (final value shown instantly). Avoid for precise values the user must read while animating, or many counters at once.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits a legal document against legal design principles. Scores the document on six pillars: language patterns (bureaucratese, archaisms, passive voice, nominalization), readability (Flesch Reading Ease and language-specific equivalents), structure and navigation, hidden conditions (material obligations buried away from their headings), statutory duplication (restating the law instead of citing it), and visual hierarchy where layout is available. Assessment-only; does not rewrite the document. Works on English, French, and German documents, inferring the applicable jurisdiction from the document's language and textual signals: governing-law clause, statute citations, party addresses. Use when a user shares a legal document (contract, NDA, T&C, privacy policy, internal policy) asking how good the drafting is from a legal design perspective, whether it is readable, whether it contains buried clauses or restates the law, or how it scores on Flesch / LIX / Amstad / Kandel-Moles readability metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses which of the Art. 50(1)-(5) transparency obligations of the EU AI Act apply to a given AI system's provider or deployer, grounded in the final Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content (June 2026) and the Commission's draft Art. 50 Guidelines. Covers AI-chatbot disclosure, deepfake and synthetic-content marking/watermarking, emotion-recognition and biometric-categorisation notices, the machine-readable marking duty, the obviousness exceptions, and the implementation timeline. Outputs a formal mini-report plus a per-obligation compliance checklist with gap flags. For breadth-first tier triage use the EU AI Act System Classifier; for raw Art. 50 text and Q&A use the EU AI Act Knowledge Base; for the full role x tier matrix use the EU AI Act Obligations Mapper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GDPR Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) guidance under Article 35 GDPR, EDPB Guidelines WP 248 rev.01, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI), and national SA blacklists/whitelists. Triggers: "DPIA", "DSFA", "Datenschutz-Folgenabschätzung", "impact assessment", "Art. 35", "do I need a DPIA", descriptions of new high-risk processing (profiling, AI, biometrics, large-scale monitoring, special category data), Art. 36 prior consultation questions, national blacklist/whitelist queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interpret learning analytics data and translate dashboard findings into actionable teaching decisions. Use when reviewing LMS data, quiz patterns, or engagement metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When you want to set up an agent loop, cron-scheduled task, or recurring workflow that runs autonomously. Judgment layer on top of Claude Code's ScheduleWakeup, CronCreate, and /loop — or, on other hosts, cron/GitHub Actions plus a headless agent CLI. Picks dynamic pacing, fixed cron, or a one-shot loop; designs idempotent loop bodies; sets bail-out conditions so loops don't run forever. Examples — weekly review pulse, daily brief, hourly metric monitor, periodic vault compile, upstream-check for an adapted skill. Triggers on "/loopify," "set up a loop," "schedule this task," "run this daily," "run this weekly," "cron this," "make this recurring," "automate this on a schedule," "keep this running until X." Part of the -ify trifecta (skillify / toolify / loopify). NOT for authoring a new skill — that's skillify. NOT for adding a tool/integration — that's toolify.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert blueprint for horror games: sawtooth tension pacing, Director macro-AI, sensory predator AI, sanity/stress FX, and scarcity loops. Use when building psychological/survival horror, dual-brain stalker AI (cheating Director + honest LoS/sound), flashlight/fog atmosphere, or safe-room saves. Keywords: horror_game, tension_pacing, director_system, sensory_perception, sanity_system, volumetric_fog, AI_reaction_time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert blueprint for horror games: sawtooth tension pacing, Director macro-AI, sensory predator AI, sanity/stress FX, and scarcity loops. Use when building psychological/survival horror, dual-brain stalker AI (cheating Director + honest LoS/sound), flashlight/fog atmosphere, or safe-room saves. Keywords: horror_game, tension_pacing, director_system, sensory_perception, sanity_system, volumetric_fog, AI_reaction_time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Best-practices reference for preparing and instrumenting applications on Temps. Covers the app runtime contract (`.temps.yaml` health, HOST/PORT, readiness, SIGTERM, replicas, migrations) and production observability (errors, traces, metrics, logs, analytics, privacy, sampling, cardinality, credential boundaries). Use whenever building or reviewing an app for Temps, configuring health checks, adding telemetry, diagnosing missing/noisy signals, or checking OTLP/Sentry/analytics ingestion. Triggers include "temps best practices", "prepare this app for Temps", ".temps.yaml health", "temps health check", "ignore health checks in otel", "temps observability", "wire up telemetry", and "instrument this app for temps". Prefer focused setup skills for a single SDK. Use temps-cli for executing deploy and resource-management commands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-earnings analysis for A-share stocks. Builds scenario frameworks (actual vs consensus, beat/miss cases), identifies key metrics to watch, and prepares positioning notes before Chinese companies report quarterly results. Use instead of the original earnings-preview skill for A-share coverage. Triggers on "A股财报前瞻", "季报前瞻", "业绩前瞻", "earnings preview", "what to watch for [company] earnings", or "pre-earnings setup".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing game math — vectors, transforms, interpolation, curves, random number generation, and common geometric recipes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。