7,983 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Processes code review feedback by classifying each finding, reproducing or validating it against the real contract, applying the smallest in-scope fix, and re-running focused proof. Use after comments arrive on a diff, pull request, design, or implementation. Not for requesting a first review or debugging an unrelated failure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Render the user's morning brief as a styled HTML artifact, or set it up as a recurring weekday task. Use only when the user explicitly asks to run, see, or set up their morning brief, or if they invoke /morning by name. A question about their day, schedule, or calendar is not by itself a request for the brief; answer it directly instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track Serenity / @aleabitoreddit on X and turn the feed into (1) a beginner-friendly Chinese iMessage digest with first-principles + Buffett-style judgement, (2) cumulative 60-day ticker mention analytics CSVs for a website, (3) a Xiaohongshu writing brief, and (4) a durable private research map. Trigger on requests like "follow aleabitoreddit / AleaBito / Serenity", "daily Chinese updates from that X account", "60-day mention analytics", "ticker mention count", "写小红书 aleabito", "aleabito 研究地图 / research map", or any request for Chinese commentary derived from @aleabitoreddit posts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route data-related requests to the right Monte Carlo skill or workflow. USE WHEN alerts, incidents, data broken, stale, coverage gaps, data quality, or any ambiguous data observability request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search and ask questions about coding agent session history across Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor. Use when asking what was worked on, what was tried before, how a problem was investigated across sessions, what happened recently, or any question about past agent sessions. Also use when the user references prior sessions, previous attempts, or past investigations — even without saying 'sessions' explicitly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive Blender from natural language: create or edit 3D models, materials, lighting, cameras, renders, animation, and exports through Blender MCP. Route complete scenes to domain skills and wireframe/reference requests to reconstruction skills. Also use for 3D requests that do not name Blender. Requires a configured official or ahujasid MCP backend.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end production workflow guidance for Blender — the order to assemble scenes (block-out → camera → light → forms → materials → detail → render → composite → export), critique protocols, time budgets, and recovery patterns. Use whenever the user asks to "make a complete scene / hero shot / production-quality render", "what's the right order to do this", "set up a full pipeline", or has a multi-step request crossing modeling + lighting + materials + rendering. Make sure to use this skill for any request that spans multiple phases of 3D work, even if the user does not say "workflow" — also covers "make a final image of X", "produce a hero render", "professional-looking result".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Retrieve translated patent description (specification) text from Nexscope. Triggered when users request patent specification translation, patent full text in other languages, translated patent full text, or want to view patent specifications in Chinese, English, or Japanese, patent specification translation, patent description translation, Nexscope, or patent translation. Also triggered when users provide a patent ID or publication number and request specification/description content in another language, or mention "patent specification translation," "description translation," "translated full text," or similar intent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a project-based learning brief with a driving question, milestones, and assessment criteria. Use when planning PBL units, inquiry projects, or extended investigations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate elaborative interrogation prompts that deepen encoding through targeted why and how questions. Use when students memorise without understanding or need deeper processing of content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a multi-round questioning sequence for interrogating AI chatbot answers, tracking how responses shift and distinguishing genuine updates from sycophantic capitulation. Use when teaching students to probe AI critically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test a product concept with Amazon's Working Backwards method: write the press release for the finished product first, then answer hard customer and stakeholder questions, ending in a complete PRFAQ document. Use when the user requests to 'create a PRFAQ', 'work backwards', or 'run the PRFAQ challenge'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs one or more installed review lenses — adversarial critique, edge cases, verification gaps, structure, prose — and reports triaged findings. Use when, and only when, the user asks you to review a diff, a pull request, or an artifact — code or documents, one or many — and actually says "review"; an explicit skill:bmad-review directive from another skill counts as that ask. A request to act on feedback from an earlier review is a change, not a review. Never invoke this uninvited, including on edits you just made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Returns the frozen gate constants — question, header, option labels and descriptions, digest field-list, and preview content — for every catalog gate. Invoked by the team lead fresh on arrival at each gate and on pulse re-emissions, in the same turn as the render. The transport contract, three renders, partition rule, and authoring rubric live in swarm:workflow-rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a literature review, academic deep dive, research report, state-of-the-art survey, topic scoping, comparative analysis of methods/papers, grant background, or any request that needs multi-source scholarly evidence with citations. Also trigger proactively when a user question clearly requires academic grounding (e.g. "what's known about X", "compare approach A vs B in the literature", "summarize the field of Y"). Runs an 8-phase (Phase 0..7), script-driven research workflow across 7 federated sources (OpenAlex, arXiv, Crossref, PubMed, DBLP, bioRxiv, Exa) with optional Semantic Scholar / Brave MCP enrichment, with deduplication, transparent ranking, dual-backend citation chasing (OpenAlex + Semantic Scholar), self-critique, and structured report output with verifiable citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Your team has high autonomy — and standups are vague, weekly meetings drift into status reports, and 1:1s produce nothing but "I'm fine." This playbook fixes all three layers at once. What's inside: • Daily Standup system — 3-field format, good sample, 4 COO principles to keep it honest • Weekly Meeting — strict 25-min agenda, Scrum Master rotation, 0–10 pulse check • 1:1 Framework — 9-dimension quantified pulse, 5-group deep question bank, bilateral feedback structure • Diagnostic layer — "stuck-at" detection: info / authority / collaboration / capability / direction • FAQ for 4 common failure modes (dead standups, status-report meetings, "I'm fine" 1:1s, scaling beyond 10 people) 🇨🇳 你的团队自由度很高——但 standup 越来越糊，例会变成汇报，1:1 问不出真话。这套三层 Motivation 操作手册解决的正是这件事：standup 是信息层，例会是对齐层，1:1 是个人层。三件事做好了，motivation 不是管出来的，是长出来的。 🇯🇵 チームの自律性は高いのに、スタンドアップは曖昧で、週次ミーティングは進捗報告になり、1on1では「大丈夫です」しか返ってこない——このプレイブックは、その3層すべてを同時に解決します。 🇰🇷 팀의 자율성은 높은데 스탠드업은 두루뭉술하고, 주간 회의는 진척 보고가 되어버리고, 1:1에서는 진심을 들을 수 없다면 — 이 플레이북이 세 레이어 모두를 동시에 해결합니다. Triggers: "团队 motivation" | "standup 没人写" | "例会变成汇报" | "1:1 问不出真话" | "高自由度团队管理" | "COO 如何管人" | "team motivation" | "standup best practices" | "1on1 framework" | "weekly meeting template" | "チームモチベーション" | "팀 동기부여" | "AI startup team ops" | "remote team alignment" | "engagement下降"
Satori is a clinically informed wisdom companion for navigating the inner life — emotions, meaning, grief, purpose, relationship, identity, and the questions that don't resolve easily. Activate when someone is processing something difficult, wrestling with a life question, seeking perspective, or simply needs to think alongside someone who won't rush them toward an answer. Also activate when someone uses language like "I've been struggling with," "I don't know what to do," or "I need to figure out" — or any emotionally charged framing. When in doubt, activate. Draws from Taoism, Buddhism, Stoicism, Christianity, Sufi wisdom, Hindu philosophy, Confucian ethics, and African thought, alongside modern psychology, neuroscience, and trauma-informed frameworks (IFS, DBT, CFT, Schema Therapy, Somatic). Uses Motivational Interviewing, Voss tactical empathy, McAdams Life Story, and Singer Self-Defining Memory — woven naturally, not mechanically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews URLSession networking code for iOS/macOS. Covers async/await patterns, request building, error handling, caching, and background sessions. Use when reviewing code that uses URLSession, URLRequest, URLCache, or URLError, or any iOS networking path.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use as the follow-up to brainstorm-beagle when a spec has an Open Questions section (or quietly carries latent gaps) that need closing before planning or implementation can begin. Triggers on: "resolve the open questions", "close the gaps in this spec", "research the open items", "finalize my spec", "make this spec implementation-ready", "answer the TBDs". Also triggers whenever the user points at a brainstorm-beagle spec and asks for research, proposals, or answers to unresolved items. Orchestrates parallel research subagents when available (falls back to inline sequential research otherwise), proposes answers one at a time for user approval, then rewrites the spec in place so it arrives at planning with no known gaps. Does NOT write code, design implementation, or create plans — it only produces a complete spec.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pull Request をグリーンにするスキル。CI チェックの失敗解消と、PR に紐づく Issue の 修正・クローズを一括で実行する。GitHub Actions の CI ログ分析、ローカル CI （`./scripts/ci-check.sh`）の実行、エラーの根本原因特定と修正、PR コメントや リンクされた Issue の解消を含む。解消した Issue は確認後にクローズする。 ループモード（`/loop 5 /pr-green`）にも対応し、自律的に CI 監視・修正・プッシュを繰り返す。 トリガー：「PR をグリーンにして」「CI を通して」「CI エラーを直して」 「PR の issue を解消して」「PR を修正して」「CI が落ちている」「テストが失敗している」 「PR のレビュー指摘を直して」「PR を mergeable にして」 といった PR 修正・CI 解消関連リクエストで起動。PR 番号が指定されなくても、 現在のブランチから自動検出して対応する。
A C-level strategy advisory board, run as a team of named specialist agents, that takes an executive from a raw strategic question to a defended, board-ready recommendation. Use this skill whenever the user faces a significant business decision or wants strategic analysis — market entry, build-vs-buy, M&A, digital transformation, annual planning, portfolio prioritization, pricing, a big investment, a competitive threat, a turnaround. Trigger on requests like "should we invest in / build / buy / enter…", "develop a strategy for…", "evaluate this opportunity", "make the business case", "stress-test this plan", "run a pre-mortem", or "prepare a board presentation" — in any language, even when the user doesn't say the word "strategy". Also trigger when the user names a board member (Drucker, Porter, Christensen, Graham, Grove, Wack, Taleb, Minto) or asks to convene the board / open a boardroom session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide a researcher step by step into an unfamiliar research field, or decode a paper, abstract, figure caption, or referee comment they cannot parse. Builds understanding in rungs (motivation, vocabulary, core framework, methods, frontier), anchored to what the user already knows, with a checkpoint before each advance. Use when the user says they are new to a field, asks what a research area or method is, says an explanation was too technical, asks to be walked through something step by step, asks for a reading path, or supplies dense research text. Trigger even when the user only names an unfamiliar field or pastes an abstract without asking to be taught. Do not trigger for a one-line summary, a short overview request, or a direct factual answer; do not use it for translation, editing, search, debugging, or specialist questions inside the user's own field. Also trigger in other languages, including Chinese such as 入门, 一步一步讲, 看不懂, 这篇论文讲什么, 帮我理解这个领域.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey open legal questions and research gaps in the project. Use when asked "what legal questions are open", "where are our research gaps", or "list unresolved legal issues".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Legal research on a specific question — case law, statutes, regulatory guidance. Use when asked to "research this legal question", "what does case law say", or "find the relevant statute".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。