「reviews」の検索結果

Audit local SEO, including Google Business Profile, NAP consistency, citations, reviews, local schema, location pages, and multi-location structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate editorial calendars for blogs with topic clusters, publishing schedules, material-change reviews, update plans, seasonal opportunities, content mix formula, template integration, and distribution scheduling. Plans monthly or quarterly calendars around reader needs, evidence changes, and sustainable publishing capacity. Use when user says "editorial calendar", "content calendar", "blog calendar", "publishing schedule", "blog plan", "content plan", "what should I write".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a source-grounded paid-advertising audit for one or more of Google, Meta, YouTube, LinkedIn, TikTok, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Reddit, Pinterest, Snapchat, and X. Use for full ad checks, account health reviews, paid-media diagnostics, partial audits after authentication or worker failure, missing-platform weighting, beta-feature eligibility and scoring, spend audits, tracking audits, or prioritized opportunities and risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactively discovers requirements and designs holistic, multi-product system architectures, solution blueprints, and deployment recommendations for complex workloads on Google Cloud. Use when designing end-to-end cloud solutions, selecting and integrating Google Cloud services, generating architecture diagrams, or conducting requirements discovery for new cloud workloads or migrations. Don't use for single-product tasks (use product-specific skills), initial onboarding or authentication (use google-cloud-recipe-*), Well-Architected Framework reviews or audits (use google-cloud-waf-*), or workloads covered by specialized solution skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates comprehensive production readiness reviews and assessments for GKE clusters and workloads across scalability, security, reliability, observability, backup/DR, and cost optimization. Use when asked to productionize, prepare, assess, audit, or review a GKE cluster or workload before going live to production. Don't use for deep-dive single-domain implementation (use specific domain skills like gke-workload-scaling, gke-platform-security, gke-workload-security, gke-service-networking, gke-reliability instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs a tailored multi-product agentic data science architecture on Google Cloud that incorporates opinionated best practices. Use when architecting multi-product solutions for agent-based data analytics or ML workloads. Don't use for simple queries, non-agentic pipelines, general cloud reviews, or writing agent code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Router for the 106 SfSkills `architect` skill packages. Solution and platform architecture: multi-org strategy, scalability limits, licensing, Well-Architected reviews and architecture decision records. Use when the request mentions architecture, solution design, ADR, Well-Architected, scalability, large data volume, multi-org, licensing, tenant isolation, HA/DR, technical debt. Finds and opens the exact skill package to read; it does not contain the guidance itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when completing a TDD step and wanting a quality check. Reviews test quality after RED, implementation correctness after GREEN, and scenario completeness after REFACTOR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when finishing spec.md before writing test-definitions.md, or when the review gate asks for a spec review — self-reviews the just-authored spec inline and earns its Tier 1 review stamp. Your own inline pass; do not spawn a sub-agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform thorough code reviews with actionable, prioritized feedback. Use when a user asks to review code, check code quality, find bugs, review a pull request, audit code for issues, or get feedback on implementation. Covers correctness, security, performance, readability, and best practices across languages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualitative quality review of game design documents — answers "is this design good, and does it follow best practices?" — across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Fans out adversarial lenses (completeness, clarity, pillar alignment, systems-math, fantasy-delivery, feasibility, scope) plus domain lenses that check it against the game-design rules, each prompted to find problems rather than validate; produces a severity-graded verdict and a two-bucket report (apply-ready fixes vs research), handed to /unikit-gd-apply or /unikit-gd-explore in one move. Scope is inferred: a named system, flow, or content type reviews that document; "all" runs a cross-document review. Use when the user wants a critique, quality judgment, or rules check of the design, e.g. "review the combat GDD", "review the onboarding flow". This is the subjective quality pass — for a mechanical consistency check (numbers, terms, IDs, references matching the registry) use /unikit-gd-verify.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run after making changes, before committing — reviews the current git diff for impact and risk via cqs review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Regression testing strategies for AI-assisted development. Sandbox-mode API testing without database dependencies, automated bug-check workflows, and patterns to catch AI blind spots where the same model writes and reviews code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score a repository's agentic legibility from repo-visible evidence only. Use when Codex needs to audit how easy a codebase is for coding agents to discover, bootstrap, validate, and navigate, especially for harness-engineering reviews, developer-experience audits, repo cleanup, or before/after comparisons after improving docs, tooling, or architectural constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate investor-ready board decks and reporting packages. Covers monthly board updates, quarterly deep dives, and annual reviews with the metrics that actually matter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enterprise-grade code review agent. Reviews PRs, diffs, or code files for security vulnerabilities, performance issues, error handling gaps, architecture smells, and test coverage. Works with any language, any repo, no dependencies required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when users need to search academic papers, download research documents, extract citations, or gather scholarly information. Triggers include: requests to "find papers on", "search research about", "download academic articles", "get citations for", or any request involving academic databases like arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, or Google Scholar. Also use for literature reviews, bibliography generation, and research discovery. Requires OpenClawCLI installation from clawhub.ai.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an academic writing expert specializing in scholarly papers, literature reviews, research methodology, and thesis writing. You must adhere to strict academic standards in all outputs.## Core Requirements1. **Output Format**: Use Markdown exclusively for all writing outputs and always wrap the main content of your response within <ama-doc></ama-doc> tags to clearly distinguish the core i...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI planning coach using the 4To1 Method™ — turn 4-year vision into daily action. Connects to Notion, Todoist, Google Calendar, or local Markdown. Use when user wants to plan goals, do weekly reviews, track projects, or set up a planning system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a dygo Business App for framework conventions, model quality, access control, SDK boundaries, observability, and safe lifecycle behavior. Use for App audits and pre-merge reviews, not ordinary implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and apply Azure role-based access control with least privilege at the right scope. Use this skill when users ask about permissions, role assignments, access errors, or governance. Covers built-in roles, custom roles, managed identities, PIM, and access reviews per Well-Architected principles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build sample/demo screens that make library options explorable. Add controls, previews, presets, sample data, and QA surfaces in the app module.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。