2,909 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Apply when wiring validation, error handling, or framework adapters. Concentrate guards at system boundaries (CLI, config, network, external APIs); trust internal types and keep business logic in pure functions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate professional Mermaid diagrams with multiple themes, SVG/ASCII output, batch rendering, and a built-in template library for common diagram patterns. Supports flowcharts, sequence diagrams, class diagrams, state diagrams, ER diagrams, C4 architecture, and Gantt charts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates scientifically sound inclusion and exclusion criteria for Meta-Analysis based on a given title or keywords. Use when user wants to design eligibility criteria for a systematic review or meta-analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when refactoring research code for publication, adding documentation to existing analysis scripts, creating reproducible computational workflows, or preparing code for sharing with collaborators. Transforms research code into publication-ready, reproducible workflows. Adds documentation, implements error handling, creates environment specifications, and ensures computational reproducibility for scientific publications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform statistical tests, hypothesis testing, correlation analysis, and multiple testing corrections using scipy and statsmodels. Works with ANY LLM provider (GPT, Gemini, Claude, etc.).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adapt scientific abstracts to conference-specific word limits, section rules, and formatting constraints; use when reshaping an existing abstract for submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate standardized figure legends for scientific figures and charts; use when preparing publication-ready legends that summarize design, variables, sample size, and key statistical notes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when interpreting scientific graphs and charts, explaining data visualizations for research presentations, writing figure captions for publications, or analyzing trends in clinical research data. Converts complex visual data into clear, accurate explanations for academic papers, clinical reports, and public presentations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converts an audited medical research gap into a complete, structured, gap-traceable study design. Always use this skill whenever a user already has one or more candidate research gaps and wants to transform them into an executable biomedical research plan rather than re-run broad topic ideation. Covers six gap-to-design patterns (evidence-completion, mechanism-resolution, cell-state/context-mapping, translation-bridge, causality-upgrade, population/stage-specific) and always outputs one recommended primary protocol, a gap-to-design dependency map, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and verified design-support literature rules. Never fabricate references. Preserve claim-evidence discipline and do not replace a topic-specific gap with a generic workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refines long medical academic texts into SCI-style unstructured Chinese and English abstracts; use when you need to condense drafts/reports/summaries into bilingual abstracts and generate Summary_Report.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Precision editing tool that reduces abstract word count through intelligent compression techniques, maintaining scientific rigor while meeting strict journal and conference requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates submission-ready Elsevier/SCI Highlights from manuscript text or extracted PDF/DOCX/TXT content. Use when a user needs 3-5 concise, evidence-grounded highlight bullets for a research paper, review, meta-analysis, case report, or bioinformatics manuscript.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refines broad, vague, or aspirational biomedical research objectives into clear, bounded, measurable, executable, and downstream-ready study objective statements. Always use this skill when a user has a general aim such as “explore a mechanism,” “study prognosis,” “investigate biomarkers,” or “look at treatment response,” but the objective is still too broad, non-operational, or too ambiguous to support protocol framing, design selection, analysis planning, or hypothesis design. Never assume that polished wording alone means the objective is actionable. Focus first on objective type, missing operational elements, scope discipline, and downstream-ready formulation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses whether study results are trustworthy by auditing design integrity, sample structure, statistical handling, bias control, validation chain, and claim discipline. It identifies where results are robust, fragile, overfit, under-validated, or overclaimed. Always separate reported findings from reliability judgment. Never fabricate references, PMIDs, DOIs, trial identifiers, study features, or validation claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds professional search strategies for PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and similar databases. Use when a user needs to construct a MeSH-based Boolean query, design a systematic review search, expand a concept with synonyms, apply study-type or date filters, or adapt a query across multiple databases. Also triggers when the user says "help me search for papers on X", "build a search strategy", "what are the MeSH terms for", or "I need a systematic review search string".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A medical-research-native literature reading skill for users with clinical, bioinformatics, translational, and basic experimental backgrounds. Use this skill whenever a user wants to read, analyze, critique, or interpret a medical or scientific paper — whether they provide a PDF, abstract, DOI, PMID, or just a title. Triggers include requests like \"analyze this paper\", \"critique this study\", \"is this a strong paper?\", \"give me similar studies\", \"prepare me for journal club\", \"help me understand this bioinformatics paper\", \"what are the weaknesses here?\", or \"turn this into a mind map\". Also activate for any downstream deliverables such as journal club kits, comparison tables, PI decision briefs, replication starters, or follow-up experiment designs. Do NOT treat as a generic summarizer — this skill performs structured evidence-type classification, track-specific critical appraisal, interpretation-boundary judgment, and research-grade follow-up generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs primary aims, secondary aims, and testable hypotheses from broad biomedical research ideas. Use this skill when a user needs to convert a loose study idea into a tighter protocol-framing structure with clear aim hierarchy, hypothesis discipline, and separation between hypothesis-driven and exploratory components. Always keep aims answerable, non-overlapping, and aligned to the intended evidence type and study scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ranks papers by evidence family, methodological quality tier, validation depth, and claim discipline; assigns anchor, context-setting, mechanistic support, or caution citation roles; prevents prestige-based or design-label-based ranking errors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improves medical English precision without changing the underlying facts, evidence boundaries, or intended scientific meaning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes complete, publication-grade figure legends that can stand on their own. Use when writing or revising figure legends for any scientific figure — bar charts, line graphs, scatter plots, box plots, heatmaps, survival curves, flow cytometry plots, western blots, microscopy images, or schematic diagrams. Also triggers on "write a figure legend for", "help me describe this figure", "my figure needs a legend", "write Figure 1 legend", or "what should a figure legend include".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reorganizes a paper into a storyline suitable for scientific posters. Use when planning the section structure, title hierarchy, figure selection, and live-explanation flow for an academic conference poster. Also triggers on "help me design a poster layout", "what sections should my poster have", "how do I arrange my poster", "poster structure for [conference]", or "which figures should I use for my poster".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes the full Introduction section of a biomedical manuscript based on an approved or sufficiently clear study logic, while preserving evidence boundaries and introduction discipline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Organizes biomedical figures, analyses, and result blocks into a clear Results section structure with disciplined narrative ordering and evidence-aware presentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds background-gap-objective logic for biomedical manuscript introductions with clear study positioning and disciplined narrative structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。