1,392 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Write effective MCP server instructions for tool compaction support. Use when creating or updating the `instructions` parameter in MaaSProtectedFastMCP server initialization. Helps LLMs understand when to search for tools, workflow patterns, and cross-feature relationships.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill enables GitHub repository documentation exploration using DeepWiki API directly via curl. Use when researching repository structure, understanding library APIs, or asking questions about open-source projects. MCP server not required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill provides comprehensive guidance for inter-agent communication using the Synapse A2A framework. Use this skill when sending messages to other agents via synapse send/reply commands, understanding priority levels, handling A2A protocol operations, managing task history, configuring settings, or using File Safety features for multi-agent coordination. Automatically triggered when agent communication, A2A protocol tasks, history operations, or file safety operations are detected.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill provides guidance for using DeepWiki MCP to explore GitHub repository documentation. Use when researching repository structure, understanding library APIs, asking questions about open-source projects, or exploring documentation for any GitHub repository.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes position-independent code and shellcode by identifying GetPC/PEB-walk techniques, API-hash resolution loops, and relocation-free addressing so the payload can be disassembled at the right base. Activates for requests to analyze position-independent code, identify PIC techniques, or understand how shellcode resolves APIs without imports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Traces and documents signal paths, bus/aux architecture, and sidechain connections in audio systems. Surfaces hidden coupling between audio components. Use when the user asks to trace a signal chain, explain audio routing, understand an audio graph, locate sidechain sources, or describe how audio flows through a plugin or engine. Trigger on phrases like "trace this signal chain", "explain this audio routing", "what calls what in this audio graph", "where does the sidechain come from", "how does audio flow through this plugin".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep codebase exploration, architectural research, and solution discovery. Use when investigating problems, understanding complex flows, or evaluating technical approaches without jumping straight into code mutation or TDD.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic 4-phase debugging framework for Unity projects with GameDebug wrapper generation. Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes. Triggers on requests like "this doesn't work", "there's a bug", "it crashes when", "fix this error", "why is this happening", "null reference exception", "test is failing", "unexpected behavior", "something broke", or any debugging task. Four-phase framework (gather evidence, isolate, hypothesize, fix) that ensures understanding before attempting solutions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shape, implement, review, copy-edit, or harden Arcade user interfaces. Use for the website, terminal UI, game HUDs, interaction flows, responsive behavior, accessibility, Geist consistency, and any change affecting what a user sees, understands, chooses, or does. Skip backend-only, telemetry-only, generated-file, and test-only work with no shipped UI impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate tests from Allium specifications. Use when the user wants to propagate tests, generate test files from a spec, write tests for a specification, create property-based tests, produce state machine tests, check test coverage against spec obligations, or understand what tests a specification requires.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Postsecondary Chemistry Teacher — grading a lab report where the numeric result misses the "expected" value but the methodology is sound, distinguishing a conceptual misunderstanding from an arithmetic slip on a problem set, deciding how much procedural freedom to give students on an open-ended lab, or vetting whether a demo/lab procedure is safe to run in this specific room.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate ENCODE experiment quality using standard metrics and audit flags. Use when the user asks about data quality, wants to filter for high-quality experiments, needs to interpret quality metrics (FRiP, NSC, RSC, NRF, IDR, TSS enrichment, fragment size), wants to understand ENCODE audit warnings, needs to compare quality across experiments, or is deciding whether data is usable for their analysis. Also use when the user mentions QC, quality control, or data filtering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Access ENCODE uniform analysis pipelines, generate user-specific Nextflow/WDL pipelines, manage compute resources, and integrate with cloud platforms. Use when the user wants to understand ENCODE pipelines, run pipelines on their own data, generate custom Nextflow workflows from ENCODE pipeline code, check compute requirements (CPU/GPU/memory), run pipelines in background, or integrate with Google Cloud, AWS, or other cloud platforms. Also use when the user asks about ENCODE pipeline outputs, processing standards, software versions, or wants to replicate ENCODE processing. Covers local execution, HPC, and cloud deployment with resource-aware scheduling. Use this skill for ANY pipeline execution, workflow generation, or compute resource management task involving ENCODE data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Annotate genetic variants (GWAS hits, eQTLs, rare variants) with ENCODE functional data to interpret non-coding variation. Use when the user has variants of interest and wants to understand their regulatory context, identify causal variants from GWAS loci, assess variant impact on regulatory elements, perform enrichment testing of variant sets in tissue-specific annotations, or link variants to target genes through enhancer-gene maps. Handles the full post-GWAS workflow from variant set → tissue mapping → functional annotation → fine-mapping awareness → enrichment → variant-to-gene → prioritization. Use this skill for ANY variant interpretation task involving ENCODE chromatin, accessibility, TF binding, or 3D genome data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover and characterize regulatory elements (enhancers, promoters, silencers, insulators, super-enhancers) using ENCODE data and the cCRE catalog. Use when the user wants to find candidate regulatory elements, identify active enhancers in a tissue, map promoter states, classify chromatin states with ChromHMM, identify super-enhancers with ROSE, understand the functional validation hierarchy (CRISPR > MPRA > reporter), or characterize non-coding genomic regions. Covers the full workflow from ENCODE cCRE lookup through chromatin state segmentation to functional validation and enhancer-gene linkage. Use this skill for ANY regulatory element discovery, classification, or characterization task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build comprehensive epigenomic profiles for tissues or cell types using ENCODE data. Use when the user wants to characterize chromatin states, assemble histone modification panels, create epigenomic landscapes, run ChromHMM segmentation, identify super-enhancers or bivalent domains, profile regulatory elements across a biosample, or understand epigenetic regulation in a specific biological context. Covers histone marks, chromatin accessibility, TF binding, transcription, DNA methylation, and 3D genome structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iteratively study and apply elegant coding patterns. Each iteration - understand the code, research what simple and elegant code looks like, apply learnings, verify with CI. Use as a standalone refactoring pass or when the user asks to make code more elegant, simple, or idiomatic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesises the current conversation context into a Product Requirements Document and publishes it to GitHub (as a comment on a referenced issue, or a new issue). Synthesises from context; does not interview. TRIGGER when: the conversation has produced enough understanding of a feature and the user wants it captured as a PRD. DO NOT TRIGGER when: a single small issue is enough → creating-issues; the idea has not been stress-tested yet → grilling-ideas first; bug reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build with DeepSeek Coder — open code models with strong reasoning and long-context code understanding.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Understanding and optimizing cloud/PaaS pricing — cost models, common traps, and FinOps habits — vendor-neutral.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes ELF binaries, executables, and firmware images to understand behavior without source code; coordinates sub-skills binary-re:triage, binary-re:static-analysis, binary-re:dynamic-analysis, binary-re:synthesis, and binary-re:tool-setup. Use when working with a binary, executable, or ELF file; asked to reverse engineer, disassemble, decompile, or figure out what something does; targeting ARM64, ARMv7, x86_64, or MIPS; or analyzing Python bytecode (.pyc, marshal). For Python bytecode analysis, see docs/python-bytecode-re.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a competitive analysis. Use when the user says "competitive analysis", "how do competitors handle X", "market landscape", "blue ocean", "strategy canvas", "what does [competitor] do", "compare us to X", "positioning analysis", "value curve", or wants to understand how a product or feature compares to alternatives - even if they don't explicitly say "competitive analysis".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Document and prioritize technical debt. Use when the user says "tech debt", "legacy code", "this code is a mess", "refactoring plan", "we need to clean this up", "paying down debt", "this is hard to change", "how do we fix this codebase", or has code that's difficult to understand or modify - even if they don't explicitly say "technical debt".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitate structured requirements gathering. Use when the user says "gather requirements", "elicitation session", "stakeholder interview", "requirements workshop", "what do the users need", "discover requirements", "trawl for requirements", "understand the business need", "conduct interviews", or needs to systematically extract requirements from stakeholders - even if they don't explicitly say "elicitation".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。