「users」の検索結果

Instruments code to track the flow of untrusted or sensitive data at runtime, enabling detection of injection vulnerabilities, data leaks, and privilege violations. Use when users need to: (1) Track untrusted input propagation through code, (2) Detect SQL injection, XSS, or command injection vulnerabilities, (3) Identify sensitive data leaks, (4) Monitor privilege escalation paths, (5) Perform dynamic taint analysis for security testing. Supports Python, Java, JavaScript, and C/C++ with configurable taint sources and sinks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate natural-language requirements or structured specification documents into formal temporal logic properties (LTL, CTL, safety/liveness properties). Use when users need to formalize requirements for model checking, formal verification, or property specification. Handles embedded/real-time systems, hardware verification, concurrent systems, and reactive systems. Resolves ambiguities, asks clarifying questions when needed, and outputs machine-checkable formulas with explanations. Supports multiple output formats (SPIN, NuSMV, Uppaal, TLA+, Maude).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically generate TLA+ specifications from source code (C/C++, Python) for formal verification of distributed systems. Use when users need to: (1) Generate TLA+ specs from program implementations, (2) Model distributed systems, consensus protocols, or concurrent algorithms, (3) Extract state variables, actions, and invariants from code, (4) Create formal specifications for model checking with TLC, (5) Verify safety and liveness properties of distributed systems. Particularly effective for message-passing systems, replication protocols, consensus algorithms, and distributed transactions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively enhance user requirements into clear, complete, actionable specifications through analysis and clarification. Use when: (1) Users provide initial requirements that need refinement, (2) Requirements are vague, incomplete, or ambiguous, (3) Creating formal specifications from informal descriptions, (4) Identifying missing constraints, edge cases, or acceptance criteria, (5) Clarifying assumptions and implicit dependencies, or (6) Preparing requirements for design, implementation, or verification. Operates interactively: analyze → ask clarifying questions → refine based on responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate Python programs to equivalent Lean4 code while preserving semantics and ensuring type safety. Use when users ask to convert, translate, or port Python code to Lean4, or when they need to verify Python algorithms using Lean4's theorem proving capabilities. Handles functions, classes, data structures, control flow, and ensures the generated Lean4 code is well-typed, executable, and can successfully run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks whether a new version of a repository preserves the behavior observed by tests on the old version. Use this skill when comparing two versions of code to detect regressions, verify refactoring safety, validate bug fixes don't break existing functionality, or ensure backward compatibility. Detects differences in function outputs, exceptions, observable states, and performance between versions. Generates reports highlighting potential regressions (critical, high, medium, low severity), improvements, and areas requiring verification. Triggers when users ask to check for regressions between versions, compare test behavior across versions, verify behavior preservation, or validate that changes don't break existing tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Locate root causes of failing regression tests by analyzing code changes, error messages, and test dependencies. Use when regression tests start failing after code changes, investigating test failures in CI/CD, debugging flaky tests, or understanding why previously passing tests now fail. Analyzes git diffs, stack traces, test output, and dependency changes to produce structured markdown reports ranking likely causes. Triggers when users ask to find why tests are failing, debug regression failures, investigate test breakage, or analyze failing test suites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured proof skeletons with tactics, strategies, and intermediate lemmas for theorems in Isabelle/HOL or Coq. Use when users need to: (1) Create proof outlines for theorem statements, (2) Generate proof structure with tactic placeholders, (3) Identify key lemmas needed for a proof, (4) Plan proof strategies (induction, case analysis, forward/backward reasoning), (5) Scaffold proofs with intermediate steps and subgoals, or (6) Convert theorem statements into detailed proof templates. Supports both Isabelle/HOL and Coq equally.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Instruments programs to capture execution traces specifically for reproducing reported bugs, enabling consistent replay and diagnosis of failures. Use this skill when you need to reproduce a bug, capture execution traces for debugging, instrument code to record program behavior, generate replay scripts for bug reproduction, diagnose hard-to-reproduce failures, or perform deterministic replay of program execution. Triggers when users ask to instrument code for tracing, capture execution traces, reproduce bugs, generate replay scripts, or enable deterministic debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Isabelle or Coq proofs establishing partial or total correctness of imperative programs from code and formal specifications. Use when users need to: (1) Prove program correctness using Hoare logic, (2) Generate verification conditions from pre/postconditions, (3) Construct loop invariants and termination arguments, (4) Verify imperative programs with assignments, conditionals, and loops. Supports both partial correctness (if terminates, postcondition holds) and total correctness (terminates and postcondition holds) for both Isabelle/HOL and Coq.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hardware verification tool for checking functional equivalence between two RTL designs (Verilog). Use when users need to: (1) Verify if two RTL versions are functionally equivalent, (2) Compare original vs. refactored RTL code, (3) Validate design changes or optimizations, (4) Identify semantic vs. cosmetic differences, (5) Generate counterexamples for non-equivalent designs. Analyzes interface alignment, state variables, logic differences, and produces detailed equivalence verdicts with plain language explanations. Particularly effective for design verification, code reviews, and regression testing of RTL modifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically infer formal correctness properties from Verilog/SystemVerilog RTL code and generate SystemVerilog Assertions (SVA). Identifies control-flow invariants (mutual exclusion, valid-ready handshakes, pipeline ordering, safety properties), liveness expectations, and temporal properties. Use when working with RTL designs that need formal property generation, when adding assertions to existing RTL, or when users ask to infer properties, generate assertions, or create formal specifications from hardware designs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Instruments authentication, authorization, and input-handling code paths to monitor security-relevant events and states at runtime. Use this skill when developers need to add security monitoring and logging to their code, including tracking authentication attempts (login/logout), authorization decisions (access control checks), input validation failures, session management events, and other security-critical operations. Supports Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, and Java with structured logging patterns. Triggers when users ask to add security instrumentation, monitor security events, log authentication/authorization, track security-sensitive operations, or add security observability to their codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect semantic-level bugs by analyzing whether code behavior matches its intended purpose inferred from function/variable names, comments, docstrings, and documentation. Use when users need to: (1) Find logic errors where implementation contradicts stated intent, (2) Identify off-by-one errors and boundary mismatches, (3) Detect inverted logic or wrong operators, (4) Catch missing edge case handling, (5) Verify code matches its documentation. Highlights mismatches between intent and implementation across multiple programming languages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Claude's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes a repository and its test suite to generate customized mutation operators tailored to the project. Use this skill when setting up mutation testing, improving test quality, or generating project-specific mutants. Considers language constructs, business logic patterns, API calls, data types, and code complexity to produce effective mutation operators that maximize test sensitivity while avoiding trivial or equivalent mutations. Generates prioritized operator sets (high/medium/low value) with impact summaries. Triggers when users ask to generate mutation operators, customize mutation testing, analyze code for mutation opportunities, or create project-specific mutants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically extract abstract finite-state models in SMV/NuSMV format from source code (C/C++, Java, Python) for formal model checking. Use when users need to: (1) Generate SMV models from program code for verification, (2) Extract state-transition models from protocol implementations, (3) Analyze control flow and data flow to construct formal models, (4) Create models for checking safety and liveness properties, (5) Convert imperative code to declarative state machines. Particularly effective for protocol implementations, concurrent systems, and control logic with clear state transitions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract abstract mathematical models from functional code (Haskell, OCaml, F#) for formal reasoning in Isabelle/HOL. Use when users need to: (1) Convert functional programs to Isabelle definitions, (2) Extract high-level algorithm essence from implementation code, (3) Generate formal specifications and properties from code, (4) Create verification-ready models that capture mathematical properties while abstracting away implementation details. Focuses on structural recursion, algebraic data types, higher-order functions, and invariant extraction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract and summarize core features, constraints, and priorities from requirement documents. Use when analyzing PRDs, RFCs, business requirements, user stories, epics, or any requirement documentation to identify must-have features, technical constraints, priority levels (P0/P1/P2/MoSCoW), and key decision points. Triggers when users ask to summarize, analyze, extract, or understand requirements from documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize long Isabelle or Coq proof scripts into high-level logical steps and reasoning flow. Use when users need to: (1) Understand the structure of a complex proof, (2) Document proof strategies for others, (3) Extract the key reasoning steps from verbose proof scripts, (4) Create readable proof outlines from detailed tactical proofs. Produces hierarchical outlines with moderate detail showing proof structure, main cases, key lemmas, and reasoning flow for both Isabelle/Isar and Coq proofs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quickly analyzes Python repositories to understand their purpose, structure, and setup requirements. Use when Claude needs to onboard to a new Python codebase, understand project structure, identify entry points, determine dependencies, or generate setup instructions. Trigger when users ask to "analyze this Python repo", "understand this codebase", "how do I run this project", "what does this repo do", or provide a Python repository path for quick start guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert pseudocode, algorithm descriptions, or specifications into complete, executable Python code. Handles natural language descriptions, structured pseudocode, and formal algorithm specifications. Generates production-ready code with type hints, docstrings, error handling, and test cases. Use when users need to (1) convert pseudocode to Python, (2) implement algorithms from descriptions, (3) translate algorithm specifications to code, (4) generate Python implementations from textbook pseudocode, or (5) create executable code from high-level algorithm designs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies non-deterministic or unreliable tests through static code analysis and test result analysis. Use when Claude needs to find flaky tests, analyze test reliability, or investigate intermittent test failures. Supports Python (pytest, unittest) and Java (JUnit, TestNG) test frameworks. Trigger when users mention "flaky tests", "intermittent failures", "non-deterministic tests", "unreliable tests", or ask to "find flaky tests", "analyze test stability", or "why tests fail randomly".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically generate regression tests for Java codebases by analyzing changes between old and new code versions. Use when users need to: (1) Generate tests after refactoring or code changes, (2) Ensure previously tested behavior still works in new versions, (3) Cover modified or newly added code paths, (4) Migrate existing tests to work with updated APIs or signatures, (5) Maintain test coverage during code evolution. Supports JUnit and TestNG frameworks with unit tests, parameterized tests, and exception testing patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。