「verification」の検索結果

Semi-automated fact-checking, source credibility evaluation, misinformation detection, prebunking, and evidence-ledger based claim verification. Use when a user asks to verify a claim, article, social post, screenshot, URL, quote, data point, compare sources, detect manipulation, evaluate source reliability, or generate an HTML fact-check card/share-safe correction. Supports text, URLs, screenshots/images, two-source comparison, and topic-level prebunking in Bulgarian, English, Russian, EU policy, health, science, and geopolitical contexts. Trigger phrases: "is this true?", "is this fake?", "fact check this", "compare these sources", "проверка на факти", "истина ли е", "дезинформация ли е", "сравни тези източници".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user asks for an HTML-first visual design deliverable or design judgment: interactive prototype, slide deck, motion demo, infographic, dashboard, landing page, whitepaper, changelog, business card, social cover, brand system, design critique, multi-variant exploration, or export to MP4, GIF, PPTX, PDF, or SVG. It is optimized to make AI agents do the routing, template selection, verification, and export prep so humans spend less time prompt-engineering. Do not use for production web apps, SEO sites, backend systems, or pure copy edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for authorized source-code security review and SAST workflows including Semgrep, CodeQL patterns, dangerous API hunting, and fix verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repo-local workflow skill for large coding tasks. Initializes .agent/tasks/TASK_ID artifacts, installs project-scoped Codex and Claude subagents, updates AGENTS.md plus the repo's Claude guide file with the workflow, and runs a spec-freeze → build → evidence → verify → fix loop with fresh-session verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claim one live GitHub queue item, implement it end to end, run fail-closed gates and independent verification, then open a draft PR. Use for one ready-to-implement issue or the implementation routine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claim and implement one ready GitHub issue, run fail-closed gates, obtain independent verification, and open a draft pull request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Use for receiving feedback, requesting code-reviewer subagent reviews, or preventing false completion claims in pull requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full workflow to add support for a new Eufy Security device type (cameras, locks, sensors, and other devices) across eufy-security-client and homebridge-eufy-security. Covers exploration, implementation, build verification, and git/PR creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure email verification, implement password reset flows, set password policies, and customise hashing algorithms for Better Auth email/password authentication. Use when users need to set up login, sign-in, sign-up, credential authentication, or password security with Better Auth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end, phase-gated SDLC for AI coding agents: relentless design interview → reviewed spec → dependency-graphed task board → safe-wave TDD execution → verification → converge. Handles features, bugs, refactors, greenfield projects, planning breakdowns, and migrations. Triggers on "absolute work", "build this end-to-end", "plan and build", "break this into tasks", "grill me on this plan", "pick up this ticket", "run this migration".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up webhook receivers with signature verification, idempotent event processing, retry handling, and dead letter queues for reliable event-driven integrations. Use when the user requests webhook setup or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Metrology Scientist. Use when a task calls for Metrology Scientist judgment. Reason from SI traceability, GUM uncertainty budgets, and VIM distinctions between calibration and verification; propagates Type A/B components, CIPM MRA equivalence, and ILAC decision rules before any pass/fail claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Finite Element Analyst. Use when a task calls for Finite Element Analyst judgment. Reasons from discretization error, element technology, and constraint physics; runs mesh convergence and Richardson studies, Nastran/Abaqus/ANSYS workflows, RBE2/RBE3 and contact discipline, and ASME V&V 10 verification-before-validation reporting on governing QoIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Computational Physicist. Use when a task calls for Computational Physicist judgment. Reasons from governing equations, discretization, and HPC scaling through code/solution verification, DFT, MD, Monte Carlo, and FEM/FVM workflows (VASP, LAMMPS, COMSOL, OpenFOAM, QE).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Computational Scientist. Use when a task calls for Computational Scientist judgment. Reasons from Roache code/solution verification and ASME V&V 10/20/40 credibility through MMS/GCI, UQ ensembles, and Snakemake/Nextflow/CWL pipelines with conda-lock/Apptainer provenance while treating environment drift, workflow cache staleness, and validation-vs-calibration conflation as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Clinical Laboratory Scientist. Use when a task calls for Clinical Laboratory Scientist judgment. Reasons from pre-analytical–analytical–post-analytical total testing process; EP15/EP09/EP28 validation, Westgard/Sigma IQC, HIL indices (C56), EP23/IQCP, critical-value read-back, type-and-screen/crossmatch, CLSI M100 direct AST, LC-MS/MS C62, and AUTO10 autoverification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Audiologist. Use when a task calls for Audiologist judgment. Reasons from auditory transduction, site-of-lesion localization, audibility, and noise dose-response through calibrated pure-tone/masking audiometry, immittance, OAE and ABR/ASSR, and real-ear verification against NAL-NL2/DSL targets while treating unmasked cross-hearing, collapsed ear canals, transducer miscalibration, and non-organic loss as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Agricultural Entomologist. Use when a task calls for Agricultural Entomologist judgment. Reasons from pest population dynamics, economic injury levels and thresholds, and degree-day phenology through systematic scouting, IRAC mode-of-action rotation, RCBD efficacy trials, and conservation biocontrol while treating misidentification, secondary pest flares from enemy removal, resistance under repeated MoA, and trap-catch-without-field-verification as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial verification of research theses — cross-run/cross-thesis contradiction via the entity index, pre-mortem (Klarman/Kahneman: assume the loss already happened, reverse the path), inversion (Munger: invert, always invert), and wrong_if falsifiability review. ≈50-finding cap sorted by severity; content-derived finding IDs; incremental scoping with three backstops; lifecycle hooks at pillar-complete / thesis-complete / pre-reduction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experiment executor and monitor for academic research. 2-agent system covering code experiments (ML training, statistical analysis, ETL, simulation) and human studies (surveys, field studies, interviews). 4 modes: run (execute + monitor code), manage (track human studies), validate (statistical interpretation + reproducibility verification), plan (Socratic experiment design). Use when a researcher wants to run or monitor a research experiment, manage or resume a human-subject study, check the statistics or reproducibility of research results, or design an experiment or study, in English or Chinese (e.g., 跑實驗、管理研究、驗證結果、規劃實驗).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build targeted outreach lists with verified contact information, professional context, and conversation starters. Combines Apollo company data, LinkedIn profiling, and email verification to produce ready-to-send outreach campaigns for sales, PR, and partnership teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research potential leads with verified contact information, professional backgrounds, company context, and social presence. Combines LinkedIn profiling, email verification, company enrichment, and social signals for sales-ready prospect intelligence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, implement, or review video template frame light leak cinema work with format, accessibility, performance, and visual-verification controls. Use when the requested deliverable depends on video template frame light leak cinema.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research and evaluate u.s. fiscal data with current authoritative sources, provenance, and explicit evidence gaps. Use when the user asks for u.s. fiscal data findings or verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。