1.1万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
10 product agent skills and plugins for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. PM toolkit (RICE), agile PO, product strategist (OKR), UX researcher, UI design system, competitive teardown, landing page generator, SaaS scaffolder, research summarizer. Python tools (stdlib-only).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cognitive systems skill for reasoning, memory, and agent behavior; use when designing agent workflows or mental-model tooling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Database optimization, query tuning, indexing strategies, migration management, and performance monitoring for PostgreSQL with Drizzle ORM. Use when optimizing slow queries, designing schemas, creating migrations, or setting up database monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Algorithm design and analysis skill for DSH; use when working on optimization, data structures, or computational procedures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive testing strategies including unit tests, integration tests, E2E tests, property-based testing, visual regression, and test automation. Use when writing tests, setting up testing frameworks, or designing test coverage strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CI/CD pipeline design, GitHub Actions workflows, deployment automation, infrastructure as code, and release management. Use when setting up CI/CD, automating deployments, configuring build pipelines, or managing releases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
shadcn/ui expert guidance — CLI, component installation, composition patterns, custom registries, theming, Tailwind CSS integration, and high-quality interface design. Use when initializing shadcn, adding components, composing product UI, building custom registries, configuring themes, or troubleshooting component issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
React composition patterns that scale. Use when refactoring components with boolean prop proliferation, building flexible component libraries, or designing reusable APIs. Triggers on tasks involving compound components, render props, context providers, or component architecture. Includes React 19 API changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforce a configuration-driven design system when generating UI. Ensures consistent spacing, colors, typography, dark mode, interactions, and accessibility across all AI-generated components.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan before building, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a throwaway prototype to flesh out a design — a runnable terminal app for state/business-logic questions, or several radically different UI variations toggleable from one route.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Computes sample size and power for clinical trials including continuous, binary, and time-to-event endpoints; superiority, non-inferiority, and equivalence designs; FDA 2016 non-inferiority margin selection with M1/M2 framework; Schoenfeld 1981 and Lakatos 1988 for survival; Schuirmann TOST and 80-125% bioequivalence; minimum clinically important difference (MCID) vs δ distinction. Use when justifying trial size in protocol or SAP per CONSORT 2025 item 7.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end observational epidemiology analysis — from research question (PECO Population/Exposure/Comparator/Outcome) to publication-ready statistical report. Covers cohort/case-control/cross-sectional design, regression with confounders, propensity scoring, sensitivity analysis. Writes Python code for every step. Use for epidemiology study analysis, NHANES/UK-Biobank-style analyses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Controls error rates across thousands of simultaneous tests in genomics discovery using false-discovery-rate methods (Benjamini-Hochberg 1995; Benjamini-Yekutieli 2001 for arbitrary dependence; Storey q-value with pi0 estimation; local FDR; independent filtering Bourgon 2010; covariate-weighted FDR via IHW Ignatiadis 2016), plus family-wise error control (Bonferroni, Holm) and the GWAS genome-wide threshold. Covers the FDR-versus-FWER choice as the discovery-versus-confirmatory distinction, the dependence assumptions behind BH (PRDS) versus BY, pi0 estimation, the independent-filtering and false-coverage-rate traps, and reproducibility ranking via IDR (Li 2011). Use when correcting p-values from genome-wide tests, choosing between BH/BY/q-value/Bonferroni, setting an FDR threshold, applying IHW or independent filtering, or interpreting q-values. For confirmatory trials with few pre-specified endpoints (closed testing, graphical/gatekeeping), see clinical-biostatistics/multiplicity-graphical.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architectures and techniques for neural operators on discontinuous PDE solutions (shocks, contact discontinuities, steep gradients). Covers local-global spectral design (ShockFNO), reflection padding for non-periodic BCs, resolution scaling for shock width, and frequency-band error diagnostics. Use for low-viscosity Burgers, compressible Euler, Riemann problems, or any PDE where standard FNO produces Gibbs oscillations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements multiplicity control for confirmatory clinical trials using graphical procedures (Bretz-Maurer-Hommel), gatekeeping (parallel, serial, mixed), Hochberg/Hommel/Holm with PRDS, and the closed-testing principle (Marcus-Peritz-Gabriel; Goeman 2021 admissibility). Covers FDA Multiple Endpoints Final Guidance (October 2022), graphical procedures via R gMCP, primary + key-secondary + subgroup hierarchies, and FWER vs FDR distinction. Use when designing the multiplicity strategy for confirmatory trials with multiple primary or key secondary endpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate LLM outputs using frontier models as judges. Use for pairwise model comparison, quality scoring with custom rubrics, and automated evaluation pipelines. Covers position bias mitigation, statistical significance, and generating preference data for DPO/RLHF.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。