「aris」の検索結果

Regression analysis, ANOVA, generalized linear models, Bayesian methods, and model selection. Covers the full modeling workflow from problem formulation through diagnostics -- linear regression, logistic regression, Poisson regression, mixed-effects models, prior specification, posterior inference, AIC/BIC comparison, cross-validation for model selection, and assumption checking. Use when fitting models, testing hypotheses, or selecting among competing statistical explanations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Persuasion and rhetorical analysis grounded in classical and modern frameworks. Covers Aristotle's three appeals (ethos, pathos, logos), rhetorical situation (audience, purpose, context), argument structure (Toulmin model), logical fallacies, persuasive writing, propaganda analysis, and ethical persuasion. Use when constructing arguments, analyzing rhetoric, evaluating persuasive messages, detecting fallacies, or studying the relationship between language and power.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Records hypotheses, evidence and decisions when proposing, running or evaluating forecast experiments, including backtests and feature or model comparisons. Excludes routine tests and unchanged forecast operation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compositional algorithm and data analysis via algebraic databases

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze code changes for security vulnerabilities using LLM reasoning and threat model patterns. Use for PR reviews, pre-commit checks, or branch comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

IMO Gold Medal level Lean4 theorem proving via Harmonic API

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the primary outcome is authoring, rewriting, summarizing, or validating user-facing documentation without implementation comparison or required source attribution, including READMEs, tutorials, API docs, GitLab Markdown, source-faithful summaries, and audience-specific prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Integrate multiple source findings into an attributed synthesis or comparison. Use for combine these summaries, synthesize results, merge findings or multi-source analysis. Preserve claim-level provenance, coverage, qualifiers, conflicts and uncertainty rather than repeatedly compressing narrative summaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute structured acceptance checks and record their observed results for later comparison. Use to capture a pre-change baseline or a post-change verification state without treating expected nonzero baseline results as execution failure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when a human needs to review a Deepline Play result and hand feedback, labels, or approval back to the agent for revision, evaluation, comparison, or bounded iteration. Triggers on “put this run in a Sheet,” “review these results,” “read my feedback,” “make this a standing rule,” “never regress on this case,” “compare these runs,” “keep improving,” or “add the revised run to the same spreadsheet.” Skip ordinary Play authoring or execution with no human review loop, generic spreadsheet work, and one-off CSV export.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create SEO-driven pages at scale using templates and data. Also use when the user mentions "programmatic SEO," "template pages," "pages at scale," "directory pages," "location pages," "[keyword] + [city] pages," "comparison pages," "integration pages," or "building many pages for SEO." For auditing existing SEO issues, see seo-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct market research, competitive analysis, investor due diligence, and industry intelligence with source attribution and decision-oriented summaries. Use when the user wants market sizing, competitor comparisons, fund research, technology scans, or research that informs business decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Head-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develops B2B SaaS positioning from your ICP, competitor and win-loss evidence. Maps what buyers compare you to, chooses between leading with a category or a problem, picks a primary and secondary anchor and up to three defensible differentiators, lays out 2 to 4 worked positioning options with a comparison canvas so you can decide, then locks the chosen one and tests it (clarity ladder, guarantee test). Triggers: "positioning", "how do we position", "what category are we in", "how do we differentiate from", "our homepage is confusing", "positioning options". Run before /messaging. Not for taglines or a messaging library (use /messaging).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate one Anabasis v2 campaign from its log and turn what it shows into findings with one owner each. Answers whether a comparison's reading (step, no-step, not-scored) may be believed, whether a fail was the solver's or the exam's, whether the harness could know the exam, whether the tasks bracket the solver, whether the campaign is climbing, and where the hours and dollars went. Reads evidence; starts no solve, session or round, and changes no verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after an Anabasis v2 comparison, checkpoint or system change, and before any sentence claims that a harness, a model or a patch improved something. States what one reading may be said to show: the identities it was made under, the counts kept apart, whether it was repeated, which part of a harness it belongs to, whether a mechanism was live in the run, and whether the measurement is valid as distinct from whether it was exploited. Ends in one fixed report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track and optimize agent specialization during methodology development. Use when agent specialization emerges (generic agents show >5x performance gap), multi-experiment comparison needed, or methodology transferability analysis required. Captures agent set evolution (Aₙ tracking), meta-agent evolution (Mₙ tracking), specialization decisions (when/why to create specialized agents), and reusability assessment (universal vs domain-specific vs task-specific). Enables systematic cross-experiment learning and optimized M₀ evolution. 2-3 hours overhead per experiment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add a new AI provider to agentconfig.org's comparison system. Use when integrating a new coding assistant (e.g., Cursor, Claude Desktop, GitHub Copilot alternative) with proper type system updates, implementation data, UI components, tests, and documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add a new property to the AI agents database. Use when the user wants to add, create, or introduce a new column, property, field, or feature to track across all agents in the comparison matrix. Handles all four required steps - database updates, groups.json, table display, and GitHub issue templates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants an agent to run SEO for a product end to end on a daily schedule, with state kept in a seo/ folder in the repo. Covers site health checks, fact checks against commits, page 2 to page 1 pushes, AI answer tracking, competitor sitemap diffs, a monthly keyword map, articles, comparison pages, free tools and link drafts. Also use when the user mentions "seo autopilot" or asks for a daily SEO run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarise the job search from the markdown tracker - funnel, response rate, what's working, where applications come from, what's pending on the user. Use when the user runs /seekter-report or asks how the search is going, for weekly numbers, or what to change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US design and creative agencies — graphic design, UX/UI, product design, brand identity, packaging, illustration, motion design, and creative direction. Triggers on "find me a UX/UI design agency for our SaaS product", "shortlist three brand-identity studios in NY", "packaging design firm for a CPG launch", or "pull contact info for these 10 design studio domains", even when described indirectly (brand refresh, design our app, build our visual system). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Defer to find-marketing-agency for marketing-led engagements where design is one of several services. Defer to find-web-developer when the deliverable is a built website. Skip in-house designer hires, "design me a logo" DIY asks, design-software comparisons, consumer/personal-design (weddings, hobby projects), non-US firms, individual freelancers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US accounting and tax firms (CPA firms) — financial-statement audit, SOC 1/2 audit, corporate tax, bookkeeping for businesses, advisory/fractional CFO, M&A diligence, 409A valuations, R&D tax credits, IPO readiness, sales-and-use tax. Triggers on "find me a CPA firm for our delaware c-corp series A audit", "shortlist three audit firms with SaaS experience", "we need a tax advisor for our M&A", or "pull contact info for these 10 accounting firm domains", even when described indirectly (audit our books, fractional CFO support, file our 1120). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip personal/consumer tax preparation (1040, individual estate, retirement planning), in-house controller/CFO hires, "how do I file my taxes" DIY questions, accounting-software comparisons (QuickBooks vs Xero), non-US firms, individual freelance bookkeepers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US engineering firms — civil, structural, MEP, mechanical, electrical, geotechnical, transportation, environmental, and manufacturing. **For real-world engineering (buildings, infrastructure, manufacturing) — NOT software engineering.** Triggers on "find civil engineering firms in Florida for transportation", "shortlist three structural engineering firms with high-rise experience", "MEP consultancy for a hospital project", or "pull contact info for these 12 engineering firm domains", even when described indirectly (PE-stamped drawings, building-permit review). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Defer software-dev / "engineering team" / SaaS-architecture asks to find-software-developer. Skip in-house engineering-manager hires, DIY questions, software-product comparisons (Revit, AutoCAD), non-US firms, individual freelancers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。