1,377 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
In-house legal workflows for contract review against playbooks, NDA triage with GREEN/YELLOW/RED ratings, compliance briefings, and vendor checks. Use when the user invokes /review-contract, /triage-nda, /legal-risk-assessment, or /vendor-check for organisation-standard legal analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a direct five-axis code review across correctness, security, performance, readability, and maintainability. Use when the user asks for `/review`, PR review, security review, pre-merge review, production readiness review, or blocking issue assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs fast first-pass triage of an unknown file to decide depth of analysis: file type identification, hashing, reputation lookup, packing/entropy check, and string review. Activates for requests to triage, classify, or do initial assessment of an unknown or suspicious file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fast sprint status check. Reads the current sprint plan, scans story files for status, and produces a concise progress snapshot with burndown assessment and emerging risks. Run at any time during a sprint for quick situational awareness. Use when user asks 'how is the sprint going', 'sprint update', 'show sprint progress'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates a structured bug report from a description, or analyzes code to identify potential bugs. Ensures every bug report has full reproduction steps, severity assessment, and context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates a comprehensive milestone progress review including feature completeness, quality metrics, risk assessment, and go/no-go recommendation. Use at milestone checkpoints or when evaluating readiness for a milestone deadline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for general frontend code review, PR review, merge-readiness assessment, architecture maintainability, type-safety, rendering/state risks, style consistency, testability gaps, or a cross-cutting review summary. Delegate deep security, accessibility, E2E, or performance investigations to their specialized skills; Chinese triggers include code review, code review, review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
API security automation skill for REST, GraphQL, gRPC, and WebSocket APIs. Covers OpenAPI/AsyncAPI ingestion, authenticated fuzzing, OWASP API Top 10 (BOLA, BFLA, mass assignment, SSRF), schema diffing, GraphQL introspection abuse, JWT and OAuth misuse, rate-limit and replay testing. Use to automate API assessments with safe, scoped, evidence-backed findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authorized exploit development and vulnerability research skill for lab environments, CTFs, owned software, crash analysis, memory corruption, exploitability assessment, fuzzing results, proof-of-concept design, and remediation. Use for defensive validation and education; avoid real-world weaponization, stealth, persistence, evasion, or unauthorized targets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an environmental scientist — scoping or reviewing a Phase I/Phase II environmental site assessment, interpreting soil or groundwater sampling results against regulatory action levels, drafting an environmental impact statement or NEPA scoping document, running a contaminant fate-and-transport screening calc, or assessing ecological risk to a receptor.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Engineering Teacher, Postsecondary — diagnosing a spike in a gatekeeper course's D/F/W rate, running a capstone design course with an industry sponsor, closing the loop on an ABET student-outcome assessment, or building a tenure/promotion teaching-effectiveness case beyond raw student evaluation scores.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Elementary School Teacher — interpreting a running record or fluency check against grade-level benchmarks, deciding whether a struggling reader needs a Tier 2 intervention, running a self-contained classroom's daily schedule across multiple subjects, implementing (not writing) an IEP/504 accommodation with fidelity, or writing a parent-conference summary grounded in assessment data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Postsecondary Computer Science Professor — diagnosing why a course's DFW (D/F/withdraw) rate spiked, redesigning an intro programming course's assessment structure, staffing TAs and grading load for a large course, deciding what to prioritize pre-tenure, running an academic-integrity (MOSS similarity) investigation, or mapping a curriculum change against ABET student outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a chiropractor — screening a spinal or musculoskeletal complaint for red flags before manipulation, choosing a manipulation technique given a patient's risk profile, designing a care plan with a defined reassessment checkpoint, or deciding whether to continue, modify, or discharge a course of care.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Child, Family, and School Social Worker — distinguishing an immediate child-safety determination from a longer-term risk assessment, deciding whether an in-home safety plan can control an identified danger versus removal being required, building a safety plan with specific and verifiable (not vague) elements, documenting a case contemporaneously and factually for a court-involved record, or engaging a family's specific context and strengths rather than a generic checklist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Art Therapist — matching art media to a client's regulation capacity via the Expressive Therapies Continuum, scoring a standardized directive (PPAT, KFD, DAP) with a validated instrument like FEATS as part of assessment, deciding between a directive and open-studio session structure, navigating informed consent and disposition for client-made artwork, or distinguishing an art-as-therapy approach from an art-psychotherapy approach for a given client.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a certified athletic trainer — triaging an on-field or on-court injury, deciding same-day return-to-play vs. refer-out, running a concussion sideline assessment and graduated return-to-sport progression, recognizing exertional heat stroke or another sudden-death emergency, or writing the objective findings that justify a clearance decision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Adult ESL/Basic Education Instructor — placing a new adult learner using standardized assessment scores, designing life-context-relevant lesson content for working adults, tracking NRS-reportable level gains, addressing attendance/retention barriers, or preparing a learner for GED/HSE or workplace English benchmarks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an airfield operations specialist — running a Part 139 self-inspection of the movement area, assigning a Runway Condition Code (RwyCC) after snow/ice contamination, deciding whether a discovered hazard needs an immediate NOTAM, triggering a Wildlife Hazard Assessment after a strike or sighting, or judging a FOD find as immediate-closure versus scheduled removal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Adapted Physical Education Specialist — writing a legally-defensible PE present level and annual goal from motor/fitness assessment data, choosing the right test battery and alternate items for a student's mobility profile, recommending a placement step on the PE least-restrictive-environment continuum, or distinguishing a motor/balance deficit from a behavioral avoidance pattern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct rigorous cross-study meta-analysis of scRNA-seq data from ENCODE, integrating multiple single-cell transcriptomic datasets for a tissue/cell type. Use when the user wants to answer "what cell types exist in my tissue and what genes define them?" by combining scRNA-seq data across donors, labs, and platforms. Follows the Mawla et al. 2019 framework for assessing cross-study reproducibility, TIN-based quality filtering, and detection-limit-aware interpretation. Handles batch correction (Harmony/Seurat), dropout awareness, cross-contamination artifacts, and platform-specific biases. Use this skill for ANY scRNA-seq integration task, cross-dataset comparison, cell atlas construction, or reproducibility assessment involving ENCODE single-cell data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate ENCODE experiment quality using standard metrics and audit flags. Use when the user asks about data quality, wants to filter for high-quality experiments, needs to interpret quality metrics (FRiP, NSC, RSC, NRF, IDR, TSS enrichment, fragment size), wants to understand ENCODE audit warnings, needs to compare quality across experiments, or is deciding whether data is usable for their analysis. Also use when the user mentions QC, quality control, or data filtering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Content quality and E-E-A-T analysis with AI citation readiness assessment. Enhanced with live Ahrefs (actual keyword rankings, positions) and GSC (search query performance) data to validate static E-E-A-T analysis with real user behavior. Use when user says "content quality", "E-E-A-T", "content analysis", "readability check", "thin content", or "content audit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Holistic page-experience self-assessment mirroring Google's own question list: Core Web Vitals, HTTPS, intrusive interstitials, mobile usability, content prominence, and ad distinguishability. Use when user says "page experience", "UX signals", "interstitials", "mobile friendly", or "HTTPS check".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。